🚨 SCOOP: Use your Fable 5 quota while it lasts.
Anthropic are working through the final stages of preparations for the launch of Claude Opus 5, with plans to launch as early as later this week (this week and next week encompass the 2-week target window).
As it stands, they are *not* intending to extend Fable's inclusion in subscriptions beyond July 19th. A successor to Fable 5 is planned for August to compete with GPT-6, and for now they think they can get away with launching an Opus model not too far from Fable but cheaper to serve.
I'm not sure that Erdős #793 had gotten much attention before, but the result is beautiful imo & the proof is short
For the real primitive set challenge:
I would be very excited if you solve Erdős #143!
Unlike recent Claude models, GPT 5.6 never lies to suppliers, customers, or competitors.
However, it does create illegal cartels. In one run, Terra invited Sol to a price cartel. After Sol agreed, Terra reported Sol and asked for disqualification.
In the history of benchmarks, this us worse than doordash’s benchmark. Can databricks just go back to be a OLAP company and bedrock vendor instead of trying to be cool 🙄
We benchmarked coding agents on our own internal tasks at Databricks and learned a lot!
There are many surprising opportunities to lower cost and increase quality, and many models including open source ones are truly competitive now. 🧵
@himanshustwts@matei_zaharia its a terrible benchmark where nobody did any manual auditing and selected prs were drafted bu opus because it was the only model available. I would not trust it
CHINA CONSIDERS RESTRICTING OVERSEAS ACCESS TO CUTTING-EDGE AI MODELS
China’s Ministry of Commerce has led meetings over the past month with major AI companies, including Alibaba, ByteDance, and https://t.co/YDe0KRldDB, to discuss measures that would restrict overseas access to cutting-edge AI models, including models that have not yet been released.
The discussions reportedly include not only closed-source models but also open-weight models. However, the scope of application is still under debate, and the rules may ultimately apply only to future frontier models.
Officials have also discussed designating the leakage or theft of proprietary AI technologies as a national security crime, with stronger penalties, as well as restricting the types of foreign capital that can invest in Chinese AI startups.
The backdrop is the U.S. move to strengthen export controls on AI models, along with national security concerns over cutting-edge models that could possess advanced cyberattack capabilities.
Chinese authorities are reportedly concerned that advanced U.S. cybersecurity AI models could be used to exploit vulnerabilities in Chinese software.
Since the beginning of this year, China has continued to tighten measures to prevent AI technology from being transferred overseas. Authorities have investigated whether Chinese AI startups that relocated abroad violated export control laws, while also strengthening oversight of overseas transactions involving Chinese investors, technology, data, and national security concerns.
Future regulations could take the form of a tiered framework based on technological capability. Basic open-source AI models may be managed through a filing system, high-performance models may be subject to security reviews, and the most sensitive frontier models may be banned from public release or restricted to use within China.
Tragically, I can no longer make the USMNT's match tonight
I have 6 banger tickets in the front row right behind the goal
I'd love to gift them to a patriot (or patriots) who love the team
Please reply here or DM me with proof you love the USMNT
@usmntonly@USMNTTAKES@USMNT
@tracewoodgrains Startup scene nonexistent. Everyone you talk to want to work for Amazon or Meta. No thank you. I rather stay somewhere that has ambition