🚨🚨🚨 $10,000 payout rejected by
@GuardianFutures
🚨🚨🚨
Received an email today saying all 5 of my 50K Reserve accounts have been breached and my pending $10,000 payout has been denied for allegedly “hedging” / “reverse trading”.
I never hedged these accounts.
(Trade history attached below)
The Risk Team provided ZERO evidence with the violation notice.
Just 5 accounts breached and a $10K payout gone.
I’ve already emailed their Risk Team asking them to show me the exact trades and evidence behind this allegation, because I genuinely cannot find the activity they’re referring to.
Getting hit with a serious rule violation, losing $10,000, and having 5 accounts wiped out without being shown what you actually did is wild.
I’m formally requesting a proper re-verification and review of my accounts. This decision appears to be an error, and I expect my payout to be honored and my funded accounts reinstated once the facts are reviewed.
I’ll post their response here when I get it.
@EricGairns@seanbaint@Aliatcx@PVishiti@ReganHartCFO@MSTARROHIT@PropFirmMatch@PropFirmMedia@propfirmeye@BlueGuardiancom@BlueGuardianSup@blueguardianIN@Shubhankan007
🚨 They rejected my $10K payout and now this.
READ THIS BEFORE BUYING FROM @GuardianFutures
First of all, I never hedged.
The “evidence” they’ve shown me is essentially one +$99 trade from August 3, copy-traded across my 5 old accounts, which they say matched an opposing trade from another trader.
But if the allegation is coordinated hedging, how does ONE matching trade establish that? Couldn’t a single matching trade happen randomly?
Where are the other trades? Where is the pattern? And most importantly, what does this have to do with the 5 accounts whose $10K payout was rejected?
Those accounts were started on September 2. The trades they’re showing are from August 3.
I also received a $10K payout from Blue Guardian on August 18 on a completely different set of accounts after these August 3 trades had already happened.
If the August 3 activity was serious enough to constitute prohibited hedging, why was it apparently not an issue then?
I’m genuinely asking for a clear explanation here.
Instead, they’re now promoting giveaways through prop pages to drive engagement under their post and defend their side 😂😂
@seanbaint@Aliatcx@EricGairns@ReganHartCFO@PropFirmMatch@PropFirmMedia@propfirmeye@BlueGuardiancom@BlueGuardianSup@blueguardianIN@Shubhankan007@Abd_elmottalibe@PropFirmsGuru@theproptruth@PropFirmSight@_toxic_trader_ @Thepropscoutt @propworldnews@TrustedPropHub
25% of @GuardianFutures Trustpilot reviews are 1-star.
That’s 1 in every 4 reviews 🔻
Everyone can’t possibly be lying.
I’m not saying you should blindly believe me either. DYOR before buying from them.
Read the reviews. Read both sides. Make your own decision.
🚨🚨🚨 $10,000 payout rejected by
@GuardianFutures
When I asked for proof of the alleged “hedging”:
They sent me trades from August 3 on these 5 old evaluation accounts that had already become inactive almost a month ago:
BGF89578 , BGF89579 , BGF89580 , BGF89581 , BGF89582
Those aren’t the accounts associated with my $10K payout.
The 5 accounts for which my payout was denied are: BGF147123 , BGF147122 , BGF147121 , BGF147124 , BGF147125
They also manually breached all 5 of these $50K Reserve accounts.
I started trading the accounts associated with this payout on September 2.
I had also already received a $10K payout from Blue Guardian on August 18 on a completely different set of accounts.
So I’m genuinely confused:
How do trades from August 3 on old accounts establish that I hedged the accounts I requested the September payout from?
The evidence they provided appears to show one trade being copy-traded across my 5 old accounts, matched against an opposing trade from another account.
I’m not looking to argue about the rules. I just want to understand the connection between the evidence provided and the accounts/payout that were actually rejected.
I genuinely believe there’s been a misunderstanding here and would appreciate a re-review 🙏
@EricGairns@seanbaint@Aliatcx@PVishiti@ReganHartCFO@PropFirmMatch@PropFirmMedia@propfirmeye@BlueGuardiancom@BlueGuardianSup@blueguardianIN@Shubhankan007@Abd_elmottalibe@PropFirmsGuru@theproptruth@PropFirmSight@propworldnews@_toxic_trader_ @Thepropscoutt
25% of @GuardianFutures Trustpilot reviews are 1-star.
That’s 1 in every 4 reviews 🔻
Everyone can’t possibly be lying.
I’m not saying you should blindly believe me either. DYOR before buying from them.
Read the reviews. Read both sides. Make your own decision.
🚨🚨🚨 $10,000 payout rejected by
@GuardianFutures
🚨🚨🚨
Received an email today saying all 5 of my 50K Reserve accounts have been breached and my pending $10,000 payout has been denied for allegedly “hedging” / “reverse trading”.
I never hedged these accounts.
(Trade history attached below)
The Risk Team provided ZERO evidence with the violation notice.
Just 5 accounts breached and a $10K payout gone.
I’ve already emailed their Risk Team asking them to show me the exact trades and evidence behind this allegation, because I genuinely cannot find the activity they’re referring to.
Getting hit with a serious rule violation, losing $10,000, and having 5 accounts wiped out without being shown what you actually did is wild.
I’m formally requesting a proper re-verification and review of my accounts. This decision appears to be an error, and I expect my payout to be honored and my funded accounts reinstated once the facts are reviewed.
I’ll post their response here when I get it.
@EricGairns@seanbaint@Aliatcx@PVishiti@ReganHartCFO@MSTARROHIT@PropFirmMatch@PropFirmMedia@propfirmeye@BlueGuardiancom@BlueGuardianSup@blueguardianIN@Shubhankan007
25% of Trustpilot reviews are 1-star. 💀
Hey @seanbaint — stop giving false excuses to reject traders payouts.
1 or 2 traders can lie. But 25% of the reviews are 1-star.
Is everyone lying?
Why are most traders not satisfied with @GuardianFutures service?
🚨🚨🚨 $10,000 payout rejected by
@GuardianFutures
When I asked for proof of the alleged “hedging”:
They sent me trades from August 3 on these 5 old evaluation accounts that had already become inactive almost a month ago:
BGF89578 , BGF89579 , BGF89580 , BGF89581 , BGF89582
Those aren’t the accounts associated with my $10K payout.
The 5 accounts for which my payout was denied are: BGF147123 , BGF147122 , BGF147121 , BGF147124 , BGF147125
They also manually breached all 5 of these $50K Reserve accounts.
I started trading the accounts associated with this payout on September 2.
I had also already received a $10K payout from Blue Guardian on August 18 on a completely different set of accounts.
So I’m genuinely confused:
How do trades from August 3 on old accounts establish that I hedged the accounts I requested the September payout from?
The evidence they provided appears to show one trade being copy-traded across my 5 old accounts, matched against an opposing trade from another account.
I’m not looking to argue about the rules. I just want to understand the connection between the evidence provided and the accounts/payout that were actually rejected.
I genuinely believe there’s been a misunderstanding here and would appreciate a re-review 🙏
@EricGairns@seanbaint@Aliatcx@PVishiti@ReganHartCFO@PropFirmMatch@PropFirmMedia@propfirmeye@BlueGuardiancom@BlueGuardianSup@blueguardianIN@Shubhankan007@Abd_elmottalibe@PropFirmsGuru@theproptruth@PropFirmSight@propworldnews@_toxic_trader_ @Thepropscoutt
🚨 They rejected my $10K payout and now this.
READ THIS BEFORE BUYING FROM @GuardianFutures
First of all, I never hedged.
The “evidence” they’ve shown me is essentially one +$99 trade from August 3, copy-traded across my 5 old accounts, which they say matched an opposing trade from another trader.
But if the allegation is coordinated hedging, how does ONE matching trade establish that? Couldn’t a single matching trade happen randomly?
Where are the other trades? Where is the pattern? And most importantly, what does this have to do with the 5 accounts whose $10K payout was rejected?
Those accounts were started on September 2. The trades they’re showing are from August 3.
I also received a $10K payout from Blue Guardian on August 18 on a completely different set of accounts after these August 3 trades had already happened.
If the August 3 activity was serious enough to constitute prohibited hedging, why was it apparently not an issue then?
I’m genuinely asking for a clear explanation here.
Instead, they’re now promoting giveaways through prop pages to drive engagement under their post and defend their side 😂😂
@seanbaint@Aliatcx@EricGairns@ReganHartCFO@PropFirmMatch@PropFirmMedia@propfirmeye@BlueGuardiancom@BlueGuardianSup@blueguardianIN@Shubhankan007@Abd_elmottalibe@PropFirmsGuru@theproptruth@PropFirmSight@_toxic_trader_ @Thepropscoutt @propworldnews@TrustedPropHub