@LetsArmUKR@InformNapalm I am consistently amazed at the quality of your writing that you produce every single day. You're doing good work for Ukraine, I hope that people read it.
@lesterlambert11@AdamKinzinger and yet, everything scaramucci said is true and verifiable. so you can try to change the subject and make it about the messengers, but the facts remain.
@ebarenholtz Can you explain how long-term memory fits into this approach? How tiny details from long ago can be recalled by the process that you're hypothesizing?
@ImagineArt_X And yet I can't find a single reference to this new Upscale ability anywhere on your website. I'd like to give it a whirl, but no clue about it anywhere.
@ebarenholtz I would love to see a post that compares contemporary linguistic theory (say Generative Grammar, or Optimality Theory) to your theory of Immanent Generative Grammar. Comparing & contrasting the two would be helpful.
@vedantmisra@demishassabis I think that @stephen_wolfram would disagree, wouldn't he? He would say that some patterns are computationally irreducible, and a classical learning algorithm can't somehow 'short circuit' that, right?