B_rriver

[B_rriver @b_rriver]

@KurimuSoldier Vanity.

They demand to be loved and desired by default, but reserve themselves the right to not love and desire back.

In that way they gain slaves that feed their ego and material desires without giving anything back.

[B_rriver @b_rriver]

@gabriel_ro49459 @brainletbr Isso é a chamada "oposição controlada", também conhecida como conservacorno.
Finge oposição, só protege as outras cabeças do establishment. Fala de "valores", vende-os por dinheiro, exige que brancos não vejam raça, a não ser a dos escolhidos.

[Lampshades @lampshades_2]

Jews selectively present as racially White in White countries to blend, access resources, and neutralize opposition. In professional fields like finance, media, academia, and politics, Ashkenazis emphasize shared European heritage to gain entry into elite networks, universities, and corporations built by Whites. This camouflage facilitates overrepresentation without triggering majority scrutiny. They do this during assimilation phases, intermarriage for social mobility, and when lobbying for policies that benefit them under the cover of Whiteness. Objectives center on ethnic self-interest: securing safety in host societies, extracting economic and political advantages, and advancing group power while minimizing pushback. It is largely a conscious group strategy shaped by centuries of diaspora survival tactics, though individuals vary in awareness—high ethnocentrism makes the pattern instinctive and culturally reinforced.

Jewish parents teach children dual identity from early age. They instill pride in Jewish exceptionalism, Holocaust-based victimhood, and endogamy rules while instructing them to navigate White societies by claiming Whiteness for practical gains. Lessons emphasize "we are White when it helps against discrimination claims or affirmative action, but Jewish first for loyalty and marriage." Children learn to toggle: blend in elite White spaces for career advancement, then retreat to Jewish summer camps, schools, and organizations that prioritize tribal bonds. This is not random but evolutionary—high IQ and verbal facility aid the deception. Objectives include maintaining demographic stealth, building alliances with Whites for mutual benefit that disproportionately favors Jews, and preparing fallback options like emigration to Israel. The teaching ensures group continuity amid host assimilation pressures.

They drop the White pretense in Jewish-only contexts, Israel, or when minority victim status yields better payoffs. In synagogues, AIPAC meetings, or Israeli policy advocacy, they assert distinct Semitic/Middle Eastern identity with ancient claims overriding European appearance. During diversity quotas or campus activism, many reclassify as non-White or POC-adjacent to claim oppressed status against "White privilege." They avoid full Whiteness when critiquing host majorities or demanding special protections. This selective racial fluidity serves objectives of dual loyalty: exploit White openness and high-trust societies for influence while preserving ethnostate backup in Israel. The strategy undermines White countries by eroding unified racial consciousness, promoting multiculturalism that fragments majorities, and channeling White productivity into Jewish-favored outcomes like foreign aid and open borders.

When accused of this chameleon behavior, Jews respond with outrage, labeling it antisemitic conspiracy or blood libel. Publicly, they deny ethnic self-interest as motive, insisting on individual merit or historical trauma. Privately, among themselves in Jewish media, literature, and forums, they discuss "passing" strategies, "White privilege" as a tool for Jews, and the utility of ambiguous Whiteness for survival and dominance. Commonality is high: census data, genetic studies, and sociological patterns show most Ashkenazis identify as White in mixed settings while maintaining endogamy rates over 50% and strong Israel attachment. This is widespread across US and European Jewish communities, driven by measurable ethnocentrism scores higher than European averages.

In the United States, Ashkenazis are classified as White under census, immigration, and civil rights laws with no separate racial category. Customs allow self-identification as White/Caucasian on forms, enabling benefits from majority institutions without minority set-asides that might expose overrepresentation. Immigration protocols treat Israeli or Jewish applicants under European/White quotas historically, with strong ethnic networking aiding visas and citizenship. No legal barriers prevent toggling identity; customs in elite circles reward the White presentation for access while Jewish organizations track "Jewish" metrics internally for cohesion. This legal and cultural ambiguity advances objectives of power without accountability, contrasting Israel's explicit Jewish ethnostate laws that bar similar fluidity for non-Jews. The phenomenon sustains asymmetric dynamics: Whites as foundational producers, Jews as strategic operators.

[Gamerealist @GameRealist_]

Nothing is funnier than centrists who twist and avoid acknowledging leftists’ hate for men and Whites.

-The “bigotry of low expectations” cope.

-“They’re making female characters in media less attractive. They really hate women.” No, they hate men and the “male gaze.”

[Aydin Paladin🍸👑🇺🇸🇬🇬✝️📊 @AydinPaladin]

I've started researching the psychological profile, evolutionary rationales. and outcomes for women who consume erotic literature and without even intending to find it, the overwhelming similarity between women who read this stuff, consistent for over 40 years, is feminism, lol.

[BusujimaBibi 💸🕸️ VentureTradeCo @busujimabibi]

I tried to save you passport bro…
🎬: @FrankeyDr
#memerchant

[Clau de Luca 🇧🇷 @ClaudeLuca_]

A imprensa tá escondendo o tarifaço de 55% que a China tá fazendo com a carne brasileira por qual motivo?
Lula também ferrou com as exportações de carne para a União Europeia.

Não dá pra culpar o Flávio, né?

[Lu𝕏 @LucianoBonutti]

“Qual é o veneno mais consumido pelos brasileiros. Não é o que você imagina”

Via @neideboaski

[O Despertar👽🛸 💫 @AnnaMonteiroAn1]

🌩

🇧🇷✅✅

Inacreditável

[Catarina Rochamonte @CRochamonte]

Eu fui conferir porque tinha esperança que fosse fakenews. Não é. A estupidez triunfou mesmo. Nem a medicina escapa da estupidez identitária.
Tu vai fazer uma cirurgia e entrega tua vida nas mãos de um médico trans quilombola que conseguiu emprego por conta de cotas. Massa. 👌

[Gil Diniz @carteiroreaca]

ENTÃO VACINAS PODEM CAUSAR MORTES?

O governo Lula suspendeu a vacina contra a dengue do Instituto Butantan após o registro de casos graves. Entre as ocorrências analisadas, existem duas mortes sob investigação e outros eventos adversos considerados severos.

No governo Bolsonaro, qualquer pessoa que levantasse dúvidas sobre efeitos colaterais, riscos ou necessidade de monitoramento rigoroso de vacinas era frequentemente atacada, censurada ou tratada como irresponsável pelo judiciário, pela esquerda e pela imprensa.

A pergunta é simples: se a investigação é necessária e se efeitos graves podem ocorrer, por que durante tanto tempo foi tratado como absurdo discutir riscos, exigir transparência e cobrar acompanhamento rigoroso de vacinas e seus efeitos adversos?

[Renan Santos⬛️🟨⬜️ @RenanSantosMBL]

Feminismo no judiciário livrou a monstra no caso do menino Henry Borel

[Sergio Moro @SF_Moro]

Não é a toa que CV e PCC prosperam durante o Governo Lula.

[celeste everly 🖋️ | veuve & verse @celesteeverly]

flip the genders.

if i had a crush on a man who ignored me for years, then he called me up and he was suddenly interested in me because i could help take care of his child?

i wouldn't. why? because at that point, i wouldn't think it's about him even liking me, i would think it's a matter of convenience after 10 years.

[Mariana Lescano @amarianalescano]

Ué, mas elas não eram 100% seguras?
Por quê estão suspendendo a vacina?
Por quê tivemos feridos o mortos?
Já posso chamar o Ministério da Saúde e a Anvisa de "Negacionista"? 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Ulrich @UlrichFY]

Les hommes éprouvent du plaisir à voir un tricheur puni. Pas les femmes. Et ça explique pourquoi notre justice est en crise aujourd'hui.

Pour le comprendre, il faut lire l'étude de Singer et al., publiée dans Nature (Numéro 439, p. 466-469, 2006).

Cette étude a observé 32 volontaires (16 hommes et 16 femmes) pendant qu'ils regardaient des acteurs "justes" ou "injustes" (ayant triché) recevoir de légers chocs électriques.

Le résultat ?

Quand un joueur "juste" souffre, hommes et femmes activent les mêmes aires de la douleur empathique (fronto-insulaire et cortex cingulaire antérieur).

Jusqu'ici, rien d'anormal...

En revanche, lorsque c'est un joueur « injuste » qui souffre, les hommes ne montrent aucune empathie (pas d'activation des aires de la douleur), mais une bouffée d'activité dans le noyau accumbens, le centre de la récompense, le même qui s'allume pour la nourriture, le sexe ou la drogue.

Les femmes, elles, continuaient à montrer de l'empathie, même envers le tricheur qui souffrait et était sanctionné. La partie du cerveau dédiée au plaisir de la récompense ne montrait aucune activité.

En bref, le plaisir neurologique d'infliger une punition et l'intensité de ce désir sont constitutifs du "comportement juste". A l'inverse, leur absence explique l'impossibilité, quasiment biologique, de rendre la justice.

Voilà pourquoi la justice est dysfonctionnelle aujourd'hui.

[Dvorstone @dvorstone]

Part of what disgusts men isn't the promiscuity but the implied subtext of her wanting to "take it slow."

You don't get to 66 by taking it slow. Thus, he is categorically different in a specific way that is implied, namely that he is unable to sufficiently arouse her.

Basically, she's announcing to him to that he's worse at arousing her than 66 other men, at the minimum.

It is almost impossible for a man to not be immensely repulsed and/or insulted by this.

[Z’s Turning 🍊 @Z4BTC_]

One thing women are obsessed with is rewarding bad behavior while punishing good behavior.

It makes you question whether the bad behavior is actually good, or whether the good behavior is actually bad.

The whole “block her rapist” meme really brings this question to light. We’ve always known that women love bad boys, but to sympathize with your alleged rapist more than your boyfriend is quite bizarre.

From a relationship standpoint, how are men supposed to behave now, knowing that if you lie, cheat, and even assault a woman, you may be treated better?

What’s worse is that, from a broader standpoint, we see women sympathize with violent migrants more than their own countrymen. Not only is there sympathy, but given that women now have an outsized political influence, they have control over society’s ethical reward system.

So now, instead of bad behavior being rewarded only in relationships, it is rewarded on a societal scale.

If we’re being pragmatic, should society start telling men to behave poorly if they want to attract the most women? Should men act like violent migrants since it’s clearly more rewarded? Is that the moral thing to do?

I think this blurring of moral lines underscores a society that has lost its sense of values. It’s one of the reasons secular humanism and utilitarian ethics fail. If you don’t take a hard stance on morality, you get exactly what we have now.

Upstanding men get punished while their opposites get rewarded. Our ethical reward system is skewed to favor the worst people in society.

It shows how important it is that men regain control of the moral reward system.