@SamENole Accident is irrelevant. It should be does it impede an obvious goal scoring opportunity…that play did not and thus it should just be a spot foul. A penalty shot should be given regardless where it occurs if it impedes and obvious goal scoring opportunity
@rf121rf@SamENole Same way a fast break foul in bball or penalty shot in hockey if someone impedes an obvious goal scoring opportunity regardless of in the arbitrary box. Anything that doesn’t impeded an obvious goal scoring opportunity should just be a spot foul
@danorlovsky7@PaulHembo That’s a pretty biased stat…given a team lost, what was the 4th quarter score. A more fair metric would be to include all 4th quarter playoff game scores regardless of win/lose
@carver76@BaseballQuotes1@theaceofspaeder No that is biased... since pujols’ career is later on it wouldn’t be an apples to apples comparison if you cut it off for rose when he retired. It should be of all the pitchers that ever pitched during their in the MLB career what % did they get a hit off of.
@RiggsBarstool@Trysta_Krick The statistics you found Riggs should only be used to estimate a PGA tour player’s score...The statistics based on both of your skill sets (driver and iron accuracy and distance) most likely have a strong effect on your optimal club selection
@KobeTakes Coaching, salary cap usage. I mean golden state is missing Klay Thompson which takes up a big chunk of potential space. I think looking at the advanced analytics is really the only way to compare. In general it shows Kobe is way better defensively and steph is way more efficient
@KobeTakes I think you have more of an argument if you say do what he did but it shouldn’t be necessarily in the same exact years. That doesn’t seem to make sense. Also number of all stars while interesting isn’t necessarily a great metric either. Quality of all stars matter, rolll players,
@dannym1223@BarstoolBigCat@BarstoolHubbs Against an older Federer (statistically plays better than when he was young) and prime Nadal. I’d much rather have 4 years without Nadal and 6 years without Djok than deal what Djokovic has has to go through...wouldn’t you?
@BarstoolBigCat Don’t let them bully you....that means fed has 4 years to compete without Nadal and 6 years without djok...djok always had to go up against them during his time