The most likely future isn’t AI isolation, it’s AI taxation (for non us citzen).
Frontier models are becoming national assets, and countries without them may end up paying a premium just to stay competitive.
Hard truth: FSD is a ripoff at $99/month for people with very short commutes/only drive far a couple times a month or year. It’s 100% fact that Tesla leaves money on the table with many of these people. I know and have spoken with many of them. They love fsd, but can’t justify 100 a month for their 15 minute daily commute.
I don’t know the answer, because I understand that consumption buys or short-term passes likely cannibalize monthly subs, but Tesla needs to figure out how to monetize these people.
My bro is headed to the beach today and has to use the wife’s Y (he’s subbed in his 3) and he’s pissed that he has to drive manually, but doesn’t want to pay 100 bucks just to access FSD for two 2.5hr drives.
How can they monetize these gaps without killing subs?
@coproduto Resultado de dispersão de foco. Anthropic focou em programação 100%, OpenAi gastou força computacional para fazer imagens e vídeos. Mas me impressiona o fato que a OpenAi tem mt mais dados e interações com consumidor final e isso não trouxe vantagem competitiva
SITUATION DETECTED: The city of Rio de Janerio has post-trained a model.
Based on Qwen 7/2, Rio 3.5 Open 397B adds SwiReasoning on top of the base Qwen model — a framework that dynamically switches between standard chain-of-thought and latent-space reasoning, guided by entropy-based confidence signals, so the model only "thinks out loud" when it needs to and otherwise reasons silently in hidden space for better token efficiency.
Alibaba Qwen3.7 slowly fading into irrelevance at the frontier due to proprietary stance.
In it's place we have Minimax M3 and... *checks notes* Rio 3.5 397b, made by the municipal IT company of Rio de Janeiro's city government.
https://t.co/JgIJYVhoEi