Meanwhile, the trial against Rocky (where Rocky and the financial reports were not present) was about 293K euros of spending in 2016; before RCNM spent 12 million in two seasons after Rocky was gone.
Post-Rocky, discretionary spending rose a bit:
- Vehicles up 567%
- Rugby equipment up 100%
- Entertainment up over 100%
- Staff costs up over 100%
- Lawyer’s fees up 710%
So when did the club actually tank (on the field and in the bank)? Who was responsible? Maybe a court of appeal will look at RCNM President Bernard Archilla who went on a spree, even creating the good old son-in-law job, spiking expenses. That may be interesting.
https://t.co/0VNQciUhhU
The prosecutor argued Rocky should go to jail for years but the club's own financial reports (not used in the trial) show Rocky left RCNM in a good position: over a million euros in available capital. Insolvent?
In the trial (with no Rocky) the prosecutor claimed Rocky made payment with "no justification." Why did RCNM's staff admit the payment were justified and could not have gone through without proper backup?
Serious cracks emerging in the criminal case against Rocky Elsom. Why was the prosecutor not required to notify Rocky of his own trial? Is it easier to win a game without the opponent showing up?
@TheRMH I have presented with a young man who stated that he was hearing voices and is going to kill himself - 3 hours of being ignored will only make that worse
@VicGovDH
I have been watching this and I have one serious outake: if these are the best two candidates which a country can put up then we are so close to the bottom of the barrel that the US is as good as done! #USElection2020 https://t.co/xT48fZpEa3