Same thing happened to me. Got 2 strikes back to back for harassment (none of the examples showed harassment) and then got terminated without warning days later. All I get is AI replies, no real human involved 4 months later… @TeamYouTube
YOUTUBE JUST TOOK DOWN MY CHANNEL WITH ONLY ONE STRIKE THEY KEEP HITTING ME WITH BS HARRASMENT WARNING AND STRIKE WHEN I ONLY UPLOAD REACTION VIDEOS. FROM ONE STRIKE TO CHANNEL DELETION THE NEXT DAY IS ABSURDPLEASE LOOK INTO THIS @TeamYouTube
@YouTubeCreators Just a reminder my channel is still falsely terminated for something I didn't do and you guys still won't respond to me or give me a fair human review
https://t.co/3d3PpRUnCM
@TeamYouTube
Day 115, @TeamYouTube still hasn't responded. 350+ VODS Still gone because of AI moderation. Not one video contained cyberbullying or harassment. All I want is a fair human review.
https://t.co/3d3PpRUnCM
@YouTube@YouTubeCreators
It has been 90 days since my channel has been terminated. I run a VOD channel for the streamer @Blueryai1 with over 350 uploaded VODs. The channel was terminated for “harassment and bullying,” despite having no content containing harassment or bullying toward any individual. Before termination, I received two strikes on the same video (the second after reuploading with the flagged portion edited out). Five days later, the channel was terminated.
The first flagged clip involved the streamer making lighthearted jokes about a broken phone voluntarily submitted by a viewer for comedic purposes. The viewer did not feel harassed, bullied, or intimated, and no individual was present on screen and targeted with insults, yet the content was flagged for harassment.
The second flagged clip was a reaction to "Last Chance High: Bad Boy School", an educational documentary about at-risk students. The streamer has previously reacted to this same video on his own channel in a multi-part series with millions of views and has received no policy violations.
The clips and videos cited were satirical, comedic reactions not directed at any real person. There were no targeted insults, no attacks based on protected or intrinsic attributes, no intent to shame or threaten, no encouragement of abuse, no private information shown, and no minors targeted.
We believe this termination was made in error due to a lack of context or misinterpretation by the automated system. We take YouTube’s policies seriously and respectfully request a human review with the full context and intent behind the content considered. Thank you.
URL: https://t.co/uCqanUbMtB
@TeamYouTube@nealmohan@YouTube
@iaskaishow@TeamYouTube Congrats. I hope YouTube looks at my case eventually. I never posted any harassment or cyberbullying but they’re still ignoring me https://t.co/ahlsaklJW0
It has been 90 days since my channel has been terminated. I run a VOD channel for the streamer @Blueryai1 with over 350 uploaded VODs. The channel was terminated for “harassment and bullying,” despite having no content containing harassment or bullying toward any individual. Before termination, I received two strikes on the same video (the second after reuploading with the flagged portion edited out). Five days later, the channel was terminated.
The first flagged clip involved the streamer making lighthearted jokes about a broken phone voluntarily submitted by a viewer for comedic purposes. The viewer did not feel harassed, bullied, or intimated, and no individual was present on screen and targeted with insults, yet the content was flagged for harassment.
The second flagged clip was a reaction to "Last Chance High: Bad Boy School", an educational documentary about at-risk students. The streamer has previously reacted to this same video on his own channel in a multi-part series with millions of views and has received no policy violations.
The clips and videos cited were satirical, comedic reactions not directed at any real person. There were no targeted insults, no attacks based on protected or intrinsic attributes, no intent to shame or threaten, no encouragement of abuse, no private information shown, and no minors targeted.
We believe this termination was made in error due to a lack of context or misinterpretation by the automated system. We take YouTube’s policies seriously and respectfully request a human review with the full context and intent behind the content considered. Thank you.
URL: https://t.co/uCqanUbMtB
@TeamYouTube@nealmohan@YouTube
It has been 90 days since my channel has been terminated. I run a VOD channel for the streamer @Blueryai1 with over 350 uploaded VODs. The channel was terminated for “harassment and bullying,” despite having no content containing harassment or bullying toward any individual. Before termination, I received two strikes on the same video (the second after reuploading with the flagged portion edited out). Five days later, the channel was terminated.
The first flagged clip involved the streamer making lighthearted jokes about a broken phone voluntarily submitted by a viewer for comedic purposes. The viewer did not feel harassed, bullied, or intimated, and no individual was present on screen and targeted with insults, yet the content was flagged for harassment.
The second flagged clip was a reaction to "Last Chance High: Bad Boy School", an educational documentary about at-risk students. The streamer has previously reacted to this same video on his own channel in a multi-part series with millions of views and has received no policy violations.
The clips and videos cited were satirical, comedic reactions not directed at any real person. There were no targeted insults, no attacks based on protected or intrinsic attributes, no intent to shame or threaten, no encouragement of abuse, no private information shown, and no minors targeted.
We believe this termination was made in error due to a lack of context or misinterpretation by the automated system. We take YouTube’s policies seriously and respectfully request a human review with the full context and intent behind the content considered. Thank you.
URL: https://t.co/uCqanUbMtB
@TeamYouTube@nealmohan@YouTube
It has been 90 days since my channel has been terminated. I run a VOD channel for the streamer @Blueryai1 with over 350 uploaded VODs. The channel was terminated for “harassment and bullying,” despite having no content containing harassment or bullying toward any individual. Before termination, I received two strikes on the same video (the second after reuploading with the flagged portion edited out). Five days later, the channel was terminated.
The first flagged clip involved the streamer making lighthearted jokes about a broken phone voluntarily submitted by a viewer for comedic purposes. The viewer did not feel harassed, bullied, or intimated, and no individual was present on screen and targeted with insults, yet the content was flagged for harassment.
The second flagged clip was a reaction to "Last Chance High: Bad Boy School", an educational documentary about at-risk students. The streamer has previously reacted to this same video on his own channel in a multi-part series with millions of views and has received no policy violations.
The clips and videos cited were satirical, comedic reactions not directed at any real person. There were no targeted insults, no attacks based on protected or intrinsic attributes, no intent to shame or threaten, no encouragement of abuse, no private information shown, and no minors targeted.
We believe this termination was made in error due to a lack of context or misinterpretation by the automated system. We take YouTube’s policies seriously and respectfully request a human review with the full context and intent behind the content considered. Thank you.
URL: https://t.co/uCqanUbMtB
@TeamYouTube@nealmohan@YouTube
It has been 90 days since my channel has been terminated. I run a VOD channel for the streamer @Blueryai1 with over 350 uploaded VODs. The channel was terminated for “harassment and bullying,” despite having no content containing harassment or bullying toward any individual. Before termination, I received two strikes on the same video (the second after reuploading with the flagged portion edited out). Five days later, the channel was terminated.
The first flagged clip involved the streamer making lighthearted jokes about a broken phone voluntarily submitted by a viewer for comedic purposes. The viewer did not feel harassed, bullied, or intimated, and no individual was present on screen and targeted with insults, yet the content was flagged for harassment.
The second flagged clip was a reaction to "Last Chance High: Bad Boy School", an educational documentary about at-risk students. The streamer has previously reacted to this same video on his own channel in a multi-part series with millions of views and has received no policy violations.
The clips and videos cited were satirical, comedic reactions not directed at any real person. There were no targeted insults, no attacks based on protected or intrinsic attributes, no intent to shame or threaten, no encouragement of abuse, no private information shown, and no minors targeted.
We believe this termination was made in error due to a lack of context or misinterpretation by the automated system. We take YouTube’s policies seriously and respectfully request a human review with the full context and intent behind the content considered. Thank you.
URL: https://t.co/uCqanUbMtB
@TeamYouTube@nealmohan@YouTube
It has been 90 days since my channel has been terminated. I run a VOD channel for the streamer @Blueryai1 with over 350 uploaded VODs. The channel was terminated for “harassment and bullying,” despite having no content containing harassment or bullying toward any individual. Before termination, I received two strikes on the same video (the second after reuploading with the flagged portion edited out). Five days later, the channel was terminated.
The first flagged clip involved the streamer making lighthearted jokes about a broken phone voluntarily submitted by a viewer for comedic purposes. The viewer did not feel harassed, bullied, or intimated, and no individual was present on screen and targeted with insults, yet the content was flagged for harassment.
The second flagged clip was a reaction to "Last Chance High: Bad Boy School", an educational documentary about at-risk students. The streamer has previously reacted to this same video on his own channel in a multi-part series with millions of views and has received no policy violations.
The clips and videos cited were satirical, comedic reactions not directed at any real person. There were no targeted insults, no attacks based on protected or intrinsic attributes, no intent to shame or threaten, no encouragement of abuse, no private information shown, and no minors targeted.
We believe this termination was made in error due to a lack of context or misinterpretation by the automated system. We take YouTube’s policies seriously and respectfully request a human review with the full context and intent behind the content considered. Thank you.
URL: https://t.co/uCqanUbMtB
@TeamYouTube@nealmohan@YouTube
@TeamYouTube@pkilythe2nd@TeamYouTube I was wrongfully terminated for the same reason too. Its been 2 months since I got terminated but I keep getting hit with the same automated replies. If you are committed to fixing mistakes then please look at my case too.🙏 https://t.co/3d3PpRUnCM
@reneritchie@shazyoutube@AndruEdwards@YouTube Yall banned this guy for circumventing, said the decision is final, yet once the tweet was trending you finally reinstate them? All you do is defend Youtubes terrible support. My channel to this day is still terminated for harassment, something I never did https://t.co/Yd7hBEBRhZ
I feel sick to my stomach.
This is the email i've just received in response from YouTube's support. They believe i'm still circumventing a ban and my termination is correct.
This is despite all the proof that this is a blatant error in their AI.
I don't know what to do.
@TeamYouTube@DanielTChirwa Ok then can yall not use automated systems and get an ACTUAL human on my case?? All Ive been getting is AI replies saying I violated their harassment policy when i never uploaded any harassment, even the example you timestamped shows NO HARASSMENT. https://t.co/3d3PpRUnCM
Its been 2 months since YouTube falsely terminated me for "harassment". 350+ VODs gone because of Youtube AI moderation. Never got a single strike until this video (Second strike after reuploading it edited)
This is the "harassment" btw:
@TeamYouTube Plz give me a human review
@rjswiftofficial Got terminated for the same exact reason. Terminated for harassment and bullying too yet the clip they flagged doesn’t have any harassment 😭 that’s how you know the moderation is just AI, an actual human would see how unfair this is @TeamYouTube