@thembofemboy @bread_fixer Difference is there is a constituency that will profit from unconstrained development and is this invested in the change. Not so for public transit
@thembofemboy @bread_fixer The market does increase housing supply, and will do so faster if unconstrained. Public transit is a public good, the market will not produce HSR or subway lines. Unfortunately DOTs are forced to allocate most resources to car transport
@IbragimovMussa@kamilkazani All, Mughals Safavids and Ottomans were Turks by bloodline, and ruled turko-persianite states as was the style since Seljuks. But Ottomans underwent turkification as European conquest continued,eg moving court language to turkic and cultivating sufi religious order,partly for mil
@kamilkazani Ottoman Safavid conflict was more Persianite-Legaist vs European Tukic-Sufi. Mughal Persianite Sunni rulers never accepted anti shia alignment with Ottomans due to cultural link. This time actually marked a relative synchronism between shia and sunni
@SwaroopKunapuli@MiguelMadeira11@Sturgeons_Law Small ethnically homogeneous pop heightened class conflict, so good public education/engineering early on. Industrial base was not destroyed by WWII unlike most of Europe and so built a welfare state in top of export oriented economy
@csilverandgold Walkable is a word that has an obvious meaning and you can imagine the implications. Wtf does rollable or human-centric mean. Maybe it simply doesn't matter, but it feels like this obsession over word choice is either a contribution or a cause of our impotence
@NotaCommie7@yungneocon It's the same reason we can't use the existing tracks. We have a good freight system, but that all moves a third of the speed of HSR