小目标

做人最重要的就是开心。duoduomi.eth

[小目标 @beerwang]

@Rainmaker1973 为什么月球的背面会这么亮？为什么面向地球一面这么多的盆地？

[小目标 @beerwang]

@aleabitoreddit @Sofigoodboy 虽总有波动，但终破浪前行

[小目标 @beerwang]

@asianinvestors 等美国人起床吧

[Anders Storm @StormDirac]

$SIVE News.

https://t.co/fXFHwG2h35 Awards $8.2M Production Order to Sivers Semiconductors for Ka-Band Beamforming ICs.

https://t.co/tZvs1OvigW

[小目标 @beerwang]

@0G_BTC @aleabitoreddit 他说的是中际旭创

[Serenity @aleabitoreddit]

I do think LeaderDrive (688017) is China's standout component leader in the robotics sector.

I've done a lot of research on other robotics picks / $TSLA Optimus suppliers, but LeaderDrive is extremely unique.

Compared to others doing lower margin assembly, or lower value components, with higher design out risk.

Western institutions like Goldman Sachs Research flags LeaderDrive many times:

-> As a company with high technology barriers (eg. harmonic reduction gear).

-> and likely capturing high component value costs like planetary roller screws of each humanoid produced.

In simpler terms with LeaderDrive, you cover:

1. Many different components, with high barrier to entry
2. High BOM of each humanoid made, if you combine them together
3. Mass production capability at low cost.

For each humanoid made.

Please do your research on this topic before making your own decision; but long-term if you believe in humanoid sector growth: I think LeaderDrive (688017) is very compelling.

Risk is mainly coming from other emerging Chinese companies taking over market share of different individual components.

As well as mass-production margins decreasing over time; as seen with $VPG going from $750 (for early stage pre-production) -> $150 for sensors.

But in general, I don't believe companies outside China like Harmonic Drive (6324) can achieve the same costs for mass production, which is why $TSLA Optimus is creating extensive supply chains from China.

So we'll likely see supply chains be bifurcated with cheap mass production $15k-20K humanoids from Chinese supply chains. And higher cost humanoids from Western supply chains.

Again if you look at current P/E ratios and say it's high; a lot of it is misunderstanding comes from not looking at forward growth:

Nothing has been mass produced yet. AGIbot has recently achieved 10k units produced back in March.

But in the next 3-5 years, the TAM of the humanoid/robotics sector forecasted by Elon Musk and others very large, if he's expecting millions of humanoids to be produced a year.

So my expectation is the current $10.65B MC would look very tiny in hindsight of LeaderDrive's market capture of the overall robotics market.

So I don't believe thesis like this should be measured in short term timeframes (or that people should actively trade names like these).

Moreso a long term investment idea about how this company could capture a material part of the overall humanoid market that exponentially grows over the next few years.

[小目标 @beerwang]

@aleabitoreddit 白毛股神，借你吉言，下午又能拉个涨停👍

[ItsSmacky @Chaamacoo]

Reflections from a Seven-Year Shareholder: Why Sivers Semiconductors / $SIVE Was Always Destined for Greatness

After nearly seven years as a shareholder in Sivers Semiconductors, I have watched this company evolve from an overlooked Swedish deeptech player into a force at the intersection of photonics, wireless communications, AI infrastructure, and strategic defense technologies. The recent surge in the share price is not a surprise to those of us who have followed the story closely it is the logical unfolding of a thesis many of us articulated years ago when few were listening.

From the moment I first dug into the company, its potential felt enormous and profoundly underappreciated. The technology advanced lasers for co-packaged optics in AI data centers, beamforming ICs for 5G/6G and SATCOM, and full-duplex arrays for electronic warfare sits at the heart of multiple secular megatrends. Yet for years, the market fixated on quarterly losses, development costs, and execution risks while largely ignoring the customer pipeline, partnerships, and technological edge.

Where Unicorns Are Born

This is how real winners emerge. History is clear: transformative companies are rarely discovered in consensus comfort zones. They are unearthed where sentiment is exhausted, where weak hands have capitulated, and where the narrative is dominated by skepticism. Sivers spent years in that crucible not for the faint-hearted.

You had to immerse yourself in the details: the photonics platform’s unique indium phosphide capabilities and its work with hyperscalers, AI data center players, $AAPL (sensing) and Win Semiconductors, along with key partners such as Jabil and GlobalFoundries; the wireless division’s tier-1 engagements with names like Nokia, BAE Systems, SATCOM operators and the U.S. government itself. Companies and institutions of that caliber do not collaborate, co-develop, or plan multi-year programs with you unless there is real substance and a clear path forward. That, for me, is the only validation you truly need. Add to that the expanding opportunity pipeline now approaching $800 million and strategic validations like repeat US CHIPS Act funding, and the picture becomes very clear.

Bears and headline-chasers thrive on the opposite approach. Swedish media have produced more than 50 negative articles in recent times the positive ones you can count on one hand. It is a witch hunt. They obsessively highlight risk, risk, risk, with almost no mention of the enormous potential. How can anyone take them seriously? They have no skin in the game. If they could invest successfully, they wouldn’t be working for newspapers. They pretend to be all-knowing, but the truth is no one knows exactly where technology and the market are heading. After two decades working with IT companies large and small I understand both the tech and the market. That is why I am bullish, and why this development does not surprise me.

The same goes for the short sellers. One recent 43-page “analysis” packed with incorrect assumptions and misinformation was clearly designed to create fear and doubt. I could refute every single point, but why give them more oxygen? Notably, they don’t even dare to hold a meaningful disclosed short position. That is weaker than their analysis. I put real money on the table and take real risk. Please increase your shorts. I am waiting for you to go under.

Leadership and Shareholder Transitions: A Healthy Reset

Some former insiders and larger holders have exited. I am not surprised I am relieved. They did not deserve to be part of the journey that is now unfolding, a journey that is still far from over.

Erik Fällström and his associates supported the company for many years, and for that we are grateful. But the attempts to extract personal gain crossed a line most notably trying to spin off the photonics division into a SPAC where he (via Achilles Capital / DDM) was a major sponsor, at what looked like bargain terms. The chairman and new CEO rightly put a stop to it. Shortly after, the selling began. He sold the majority of his holdings around 4 SEK. Karma is real. In parallel, Achilles Capital and its parent DDM Finance have been forced to apply for corporate reconstruction due to massive debt issues. The contrast between opportunism and long-term conviction could not be clearer.

Harish Krishnaswamy came in via the MixComm acquisition. I will not lie I like Harish. He is technically strong and has an excellent network that helped land key development agreements, including CHIPS Act wins. At the same time, I am not surprised he is selling. He has sold multiple times before, often at 4–8 SEK levels. This latest sale seems to be his chance to redeem all the earlier exits at much lower prices a kind of psychological average to finally make it feel better. Am I happy about it? No. But this is the same person who, several times right after Sivers secured major agreements, sold and killed the momentum, or sold when tax bills came due. As one of the founders, I think he simply wanted to feel that his years at MixComm finally delivered something tangible. This was the last time, and frankly, it feels damn good.

Funds that fully exited did so because they operate under strict risk mandates and manage other people’s money. That is natural and not a negative signal.

These departures represent a healthy cleansing. The right people and the right long-term capital are now aligned for the next phase.

The Path Forward

No one has a crystal ball. No one knows exactly how large the Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) market will ultimately become. But I genuinely believe people will be shocked by the speed and momentum once it really starts ramping. The combination of exploding AI compute demand, power constraints in data centers, and Sivers’ differentiated indium phosphide laser platform positions the company at the center of one of the most important technology shifts of this decade.

The current momentum validates what patient shareholders have long seen. Product ramps, pipeline conversion, CHIPS Act milestones, and potential US dual-listing preparations are tangible progress. Volatility will remain; bears will resurface. But conviction built on deep research outlasts noise.

To newer investors: Do your own work. Ignore the echo chamber of fear. Build your own mosaic from primary sources. True edges come from independent thinking. The easy path is skepticism and short-termism. The harder, more rewarding one is sustained belief grounded in analysis.

Sivers was never a quick flip. It was and remains a multi-year compounder for those willing to look beyond the noise. The diamond was always there for those with the eyes to see it. The journey is far from over, and the best chapters are still ahead.

Stay bullish. Stay informed. And above all, trust the work you’ve done.

[小目标 @beerwang]

@aleabitoreddit @Sofigoodboy @user637826 相信相信的力量，会赢来丰厚的回报！打爆空头！

[Anders Storm @StormDirac]

Sorry Markos, but you seem to connect two facts that may not actually be connected, please review your DD to make sure the conclusion are correct. "Apperently people hate it when you just inform." Are you informing or misinforming?

Please check below and see if you still can claim that you are correct?

Fact #1: Ayar's next-generation optical I/O roadmap is increasingly tied to TSMC COUPE and advanced heterogeneous integration. (true)

Fact #2: Sivers supplies laser technology into Ayar's ecosystem and was publicly described as a strategic partner in Ayar's move toward volume production. (true)

https://t.co/IB2RfgsVay

The leap you are making is:
"Ayar moves from GF to TSMC, therefore Sivers InP lasers is no longer used."

But you are wrong, TSMC COUPE is primarily sillcon/PIC/package layer for TeraPHY.

Sivers sits in SuperNova, i.e. the external light source (ELS). They are NOT the same thing.

TeraPHY and SuperNova (remote light source) are separate parts of the stack.

Even Ayar's latest rack-scale AI announcements continue to reference SuperNova as the remote light source powering the architecture. SuperNova has never ever been produced by GF, that has only been the TeraPHY chip.

As far as I know GF nor TSMC makes External light source, that is done by other suppliers.
Hence from my understanding, you are making a false claim.

On the GF SCALE CPO standars OCI platform and Sivers being chosen for reference design for this industry first new hyperscaler standard, has nothing to do with Ayar, this is an new open CPO standard for hyperscalers to use if they want supported by NVIDIA and AMD. Being placed in the GF platform is not a negative, but it is also not a automatic exclusion for use in the SuperNova even if TSMC does the TeraPHY chiplet.

[小目标 @beerwang]

sive今天用涨幅狠狠的打了空头的脸，被人质疑的时候坚守就是最好的回应，继续看好到10倍空间。@aleabitoreddit @SiversSemicond

[Serenity @aleabitoreddit]

DID YOU LISTEN ANON?

Reuters: New Sivers x GFS strategic collaboration.

$SIVE has now announced its lasers will be integrated into reference designs built on Globalfoundries Silicon Photonics Platform.

For pluggable optical transcivers, CPO, and SiPH.

This is fundamentally the most groundbreaking news for Sivers in history.

As Broadcom, Nvidia, Marvell, AMD, and anyone who goes through GFS silicon photonics has Sivers embedded as a default laser route.

I personally think this news alone should easily 2x or 3x Sivers market cap over the medium term, given how fundamental this is to their revenue.

To have Sivers be the standard laser route for the many hyperscalers that use the world's leading photonics foundry.

[Anders Storm @StormDirac]

Breaking news! 💥

Sivers $SIVE & GlobalFoundries $GFS Advance AI Data Center Optical Solutions

Tue, Jun 02, 2026 07:00 CET

Sivers’ laser arrays to support GlobalFoundries’ silicon photonics platform and SCALE™ optical engine solutions targeting a $25B Pluggable Optics market by 2030

Kista, Sweden – June 2, 2026 – Sivers Semiconductors AB (STO:SIVE), a global leader in photonics and wireless technologies, today announced a strategic collaboration with GlobalFoundries (Nasdaq: GFS) (GF), to develop advanced silicon photonics solutions for the high-growth AI infrastructure market.

Sivers Semiconductors’ laser arrays will be integrated into reference designs built on GF’s silicon photonics platform. The collaboration supports a range of optical connectivity architectures, including co-packaged optics (CPO), linear pluggable optics (LPO), and other emerging data center interconnect solutions. Sivers’ laser arrays will also be available in GF’s Silicon Photonics Co-packaged Advanced Light Engine (SCALE™) platform for next-generation optical sub-assemblies and light engine architectures. GF’s SCALE CPO solution combines integrated photonic devices, coarse and dense wavelength-division multiplexing (CWDM, DWDM) and advanced packaging enablement to improve bandwidth density and system scalability.

https://t.co/xyns9R2hAJ

[小目标 @beerwang]

@cherryPayment @aleabitoreddit 虽然希望他涨，有怕一直涨加不了仓😂

[小目标 @beerwang]

@cherryPayment 看到这个ceo，我觉得这并不是一个加分项

[小目标 @beerwang]

@cherryPayment 誓与$sive共进退

[小目标 @beerwang]

@cherryPayment 一起

[小目标 @beerwang]

@cherryPayment 瑞典七八十年代有很多创新，现在也在跟随欧洲一起没落。

[mark @cherryPayment]

最近一个现象很流行 “瑞典人卖出 ，美国人买入” 。 这指的是瑞典人大量卖出 本地公司 $sive 并且做空导致 $sive在美股开盘前下跌，神奇的事情在美股otc市场开盘后发生了， $sive 每次都能V形反转并且一路从 $1美金 涨到现在的 $6美金附近。

所以我很好奇为什么瑞典人会乐此不疲的“做空” $sive？ 并且甚至到厌恶本地公司。 我很不理解因为瑞典也出产了远超其体量的世界级企业比如：爱立信，Volvo商用车，H&M，Nordea，甚至最近的Klarna等企业。 所以他们不缺孕育世界级企业的土壤但为什么现在他们对于小型企业那么憎恨和仇视？

我总结了下原因有几点：

1. 我认为一切的前提都是建立在瑞典是欧洲股权文化最深的国家。这意味着在瑞典每一个家庭都会将超过一半的储蓄投入股市，是欧元区平均水平的两倍以上。近四分之一的瑞典人直接持有上市公司股票，这样的规模在欧洲是绝无仅有的。

你甚至无法想象在过去十年，在瑞典上市的公司比法国、德国、西班牙、荷兰四国加起来还多。所以，瑞典这个土壤孕育了大量的股市资金。 在2012年瑞典还推出了ISK免税投资账户，瑞典散户可以通过手机银行无缝交易股票。

这一个前提造就了一个现象： 瑞典股市是一个极度容易被媒体影响的市场，因为他们散户多、市场活跃、IPO密集，这三个原因造就了他们的股票市场有大量的估值泡沫公司。

2. 在前一个原因的孕育下，瑞典人在2020年到2021年间遇到了IPO狂潮，而这一时期制造了大量猎物，这些猎物就是所谓的“做空机构”的目标。因为ipo上市公司中有大量亏损的小盘科技、游戏、生物医药公司被散户热情推到离谱的估值。2022年加息周期来临后，这些公司股价腰斩，然后这样的瑞典股票市场就成为了空头的狩猎目标。

3. 瑞典人在2022年前都不知道什么是做空报告，但是当2020-2021年间，大量ipo上市公司中有股价腰斩的达到了70%，激进做空者出现了。

激进做空者他们会主动发布研究报告，试图说服市场”目标公司被高估”，从而推动股价下跌。 并且在2022年期间，他们的每一次报告都能获得非常好的收益，因为那个时候的瑞典市场存在大量泡沫，这也是为什么我说第一个原因是大前提。

在2021年高峰期，斯德哥尔摩交易所IPO融资超过115亿美元。随后的大跌让大量投资者受伤，市场风格从”故事驱动”转向”盈利驱动”——对仍亏损的高估值公司极为不利。

所以结合上述原因， 瑞典人会更愿意相信本地媒体和做空机构，因为他们确实经历了 ipo浪潮，通过做空赚到了钱。

这个时候，当一个有着世界领先技术的公司出现，但是财报重述暴露信息质量问题，然后散户驱动的AI概念热情推高估值，这完全符合做空机构的目标，所以他们会疯狂做空。 但这一次是不一样的， 他们忽视了光学的发展速度和对于技术迭代的重视。

瑞典本地人现在投资只看盈利，如果亏损了，他们就会疯狂做空，他们不会理会这个公司潜在的价值和未来的发展。

我们在现在看来会开玩笑的说 “瑞典人卖出，美国人买入” ，但其实他们很可怜，因为他们经历了2020-2022年的ipo浪潮后，他们已经不相信或者说是不愿意去想象这个公司未来的样子，他们只会被眼前的盈利和亏损遮挡视野。

瑞典的股权文化繁荣是双刃剑——培育了欧洲最活跃的资本市场，同时也制造了欧洲最多的做空猎物。

希望瑞典人能够明白，ai的时代是想象的时代。

wish you all the best！

#Sweden #NasdaqStockholm #SwedishTech #NordicMarkets #EuropeanTech #SiversSemiconductors #SIVE #Photonics #CPO #AIInfrastructure #Semiconductors #SmallCap #NordicMarkets

[Art of Speculation @ArtofSpecuycky]

所有人都在买GPU和存储。没有人告诉你光模块公司的总市值比美光还低

我想从一个反常识的问题开始：GPU是AI的大脑，存储是AI的记忆。那光是什么？光是AI的神经系统。但神经系统从来不是最先被注意到的。存储已经涨了10倍，GPU更不用说。光的时代，刚刚开始。

1. 先说一个结构性的错误定价
在Nvidia的NVL72机架里，光模块的采购金额占到整个机架的20%。2026年全球AI光收发器市场规模预计从2025年的$165亿增长到$260亿，同比增速超过57%——这是半导体赛道里增速最快的子领域之一。 但所有光模块公司的总市值，比美光一家还低。这个错误会被纠正。问题只是什么时候。

2. 光和存储不一样的地方
存储的接力是季度级别的事件——供需拐点，财报超预期，市场重新定价，SNDK从$200涨到$900，这个过程很快。光的接力是年级别的结构性变迁，因为光的技术路线本身正在发生一次范式转移：

第一阶段（现在）：可插拔光模块
800G → 1.6T → 3.2T
线性增长，随数据中心扩张

第二阶段（2026下半年）：近封装光学NPO
光模块移向芯片旁边
需求非线性跳升

第三阶段（2027-2028）：共封装光学CPO
光引擎直接封装进芯片
这是终局，也是最大的价值重构

Meta在OFC 2026分享了大量数据，证明CPO比可插拔光收发器更可靠，成本更低，功耗更少。Nvidia在GTC展示了CPO将在2027/28年用于Scale-Up互连。5年内所有AI数据中心互连都将是光。 这不是预测，是物理定律。铜在高速率下信号损耗太大，功耗太高，距离太短。光没有这些问题。

3. 光在吃铜，不只是光吃光
生成式AI集群需要比传统云服务多10到100倍的光纤，正在把现有铜互连逼到物理极限。 这是大多数人没想到的逻辑——光的增长不只来自数据中心规模的扩大，还来自光替代铜的渗透率提升。每一代迭代，光吃掉更多铜的市场。这是双重驱动，不是单一驱动。

4. 产业链七个卡位，从上游到下游
现在我来把整条产业链拆清楚。
七个公司，覆盖从最上游的衬底到最下游的网络设备。

🔬 最上游：硅光衬底 $SOI
做的是硅光PIC的衬底材料——整个产业链最上游的原材料。没有SOI的衬底，硅光芯片就没有基础。护城河极高，几乎没有竞争对手能短期内介入。和TSEM形成上下游绑定：SOI提供衬底，TSEM代工成芯片。

🏭 代工层：硅光晶圆厂 $TSEM（Tower Semiconductor）硅光版本的台积电。
今天刚刚发生的重大事件：
TSEM宣布签署$13亿的2027年硅光合同，收到$2.9亿产能预付款，2028年还有更大合同在谈判中。计划资本支出$9.2亿专门用于硅光扩产，Q2营收指引$4.55亿同比增22%。
TSEM最聪明的地方在于：它不赌哪条技术路线赢。
可插拔、NPO、CPO，三条路线都用TSEM代工。就算市场对技术路线判断错了，TSEM依然受益。这是光通讯产业链里确定性最高的picks-and-shovels。

💡 激光器层：光的心脏
光模块的核心是激光器。没有激光器，光模块什么都不是。
激光器分两条技术路线：
磷化铟（InP）路线——$LITE（Lumentum）
LITE是目前唯一能量产200G每lane EML激光器的供应商，是1.6T收发器的关键零件。Nvidia预先锁定了LITE的EML产能，推迟交货期超过2027年。
Nvidia向LITE投资$20亿，用于加速AI基础设施光学技术。LITE CEO称2026年是激光器芯片销售的"突破年"，刚收到历史上最大的CPO超高功率激光器采购承诺。
LITE的护城河是时间积累的——InP激光器的制造需要极其精密的工艺，20年积累的经验是任何竞争对手短期无法复制的。而且LITE不只押注现在：EML是可插拔时代的命门，ELS外置激光器是CPO时代的命门，OCS光路交换机是未来AI集群的光学路由器。
三个产品线覆盖了光通讯从现在到2030年的完整需求。

硅光（SiPho）激光器路线——$SIVE（Sivers Semiconductors）
Sivers专注于CPO系统的高性能InP激光阵列，Jabil合作是第一个商业验证信号，证明技术正在从研究走向真实超大规模部署。 SIVE不是要打败LITE，而是作为CPO时代激光器供应链里的补充供应商——当LITE和COHR产能不足时，SIVE是下一个选项。整个CPO产业的激光器供应严重短缺，补充供应商的价值会被重新定价。

🔭 光学系统层：从组件到整合
$COHR（Coherent Corp）
COHR最新Q3财报：营收$18.1亿同比增21%，数据中心和通信板块$14亿，同比增40%。Nvidia同样投资$20亿入股COHR。COHR是整个光通讯赛道里垂直整合程度最高的公司。从InP晶圆到激光器到光模块到系统，全部自己做。COHR正在扩大6英寸InP晶圆产能，这是推动毛利率持续提升的核心驱动力——规模越大，每片晶圆的成本越低，利润越高。
LITE和COHR的关系是竞争者也是互补者：
LITE：激光器专家，EML垄断，聚焦
COHR：光学系统整合商，体量更大，更全面

🏗️ 物理基础设施层：光纤和连接 $GLW（Corning）
Corning是光通讯产业链里最让人意外的标的——一家成立于1851年的玻璃公司，正在成为AI基础设施的核心受益者。
Q1 2026光学通信业务增长36%，分部净利润增长93%。2028年营收目标$300亿，2030年$400亿，内含年化增速19%。两个额外的超大规模云厂商签署了长期协议。
Nvidia命名Corning为下一代AI基础设施光连接合作伙伴，投资$5亿+最高$32亿股权，在美国建三座专属光学工厂。
Corning做的是光纤、线缆和连接器——不是最性感的产品，但是不可或缺的基础设施。
城市要运转，不只需要主干道，还需要所有的小路、接头、路牌。
Corning做的就是光通讯世界里的所有"小路和接头"。
而且这些"小路和接头"是消耗品——每建一个数据中心都需要，每升级一个机架都需要。

📡 网络层：AI时代的网络基础设施 $NOK（Nokia）
Nokia是这七个标的里最被市场误解的。大多数人还在用"翻盖手机公司"的眼光看Nokia。
Nokia 2026营收预期同比增长7.5%，EPS增长21.2%，光网络业务增速20%，AI和云业务增速49%，单季度新增€10亿AI和云订单。
Nokia做的是什么？
光传输网络（OTN）——把数据中心之间用光连接起来的骨干网络。这是Scale-Across的核心基础设施。
Nokia的第六代超相干光学技术PSE-6s，是目前全球少数能实现800G甚至1.2T长距离光传输的技术之一。
Nokia收购Infinera之后，从"转卖别人芯片的公司"升级为"拥有自己光芯片工厂的公司"——同样的技术路线，市场给LITE估值66.5倍，给COHR估值35倍，Nokia只有30.8倍Forward PE。
这个估值差距是最大的错误定价之一。

七个标的的完整产业链图
最上游
SOI（硅光衬底）
↓
TSEM（硅光代工）
↓
激光器层
LITE（InP EML，可插拔+CPO）
COHR（垂直整合，光学系统）
SIVE（CPO激光阵列，高赔率）
↓
物理基础设施
GLW（光纤、线缆、连接器）
↓
网络层
NOK（光传输网络，骨干连接）

每一层都有自己不可替代的护城河。
每一层都在受益于同一个趋势。

6. 为什么是现在？
2026到2027年是在1.6T供应链建立立足点的关键时期，在一线客户的设计导入将决定长期赢家。现在是design-in阶段——产品正在被超大规模客户选中和锁定。等量产阶段到来，市场才会充分定价这些公司的价值。
在design-in阶段买入，等量产阶段收获——这是光通讯投资最好的时机。

7. 仓位逻辑
高确定性（重仓）：
TSEM → 今天$13亿合同，产业链里最硬的催化剂
LITE → EML垄断+Nvidia锁定，现在到2028年都受益
COHR → 垂直整合，体量最大，Nvidia $20亿入股

中等确定性（配置）：
GLW → Nvidia直接合作，物理基建不可或缺
NOK → 最被低估的估值，但故事兑现需要更多时间

高赔率（小仓位）：
SOI → 和TSEM绑定，护城河高但流动性低
SIVE → CPO时代的纯粹赌注

8. 光会接力存储吗？
会。但不一样的方式。存储的接力是一次性的价格重估——供需拐点到来，几个季度内完成定价。
光的接力是分阶段的持续重估——
2026年：可插拔1.6T带来第一波
2027年：CPO开始量产带来第二波
2028年：Scale-Up全面光化带来第三波

三波叠加，才是光通讯超级周期的全貌。存储让你在一年内赚了10倍。光可能让你在三年内赚同样多，但过程更平稳，确定性更高。

最后一句话
光通讯不是一个新故事，是一个被重新发现的旧故事。
光纤已经存在几十年了，但AI让这个故事的量级发生了质变。每当数据中心需要更高密度、更低功耗、更远距离的连接时，答案永远是光。

#光通讯 #TSEM #LITE #COHR #GLW #NOK #SOI #SIVE #CPO #硅光 #光模块 #AI基建 #数据中心 #存储接力 #Nvidia #美股 #USStocks #SiliconPhotonics #CoPackagedOptics #EML #光互连 #AIInfrastructure #光纤 #Nokia #Corning #Coherent #Lumentum