Why @get_optimum is beneficial for Ethereum ?
Today, Ethereum block building involves builders, relays and proposers. A builder creates a valuable block, a relay helps pass the bid/block along, and the proposer chooses a bid
With ePBS (EIP-7732), Ethereum moves much of this proposer-builder relationship directly into the protocol. That reduces reliance on third-party relays and separates the beacon/consensus block from the heavier execution payload containing transactions
= Today:
Builder → Relay → Proposer → Validators
= With ePBS:
Builder → Proposer
↓
Proposer sends the lighter beacon block
↓
Builder separately sends the heavy payload
═══════════════════
ePBS actually gives the heavy payload more time to travel. Ethereum says the propagation window expands from roughly 2 seconds to about 9 seconds, which can help Ethereum safely handle more data
Where could Optimum fit?
This is where mump2p becomes interesting.
Instead of changing how Ethereum chooses or validates blocks, Optimum is working on the road the data travels on.
So the idea is roughly:
Builder creates payload
↓
mump2p helps propagate it
↓
Payload reaches validators
↓
More time before the deadline
═══════════════════
For builders, that could make fast and reliable networking economically valuable. A winning bid isn't very useful if the corresponding payload isn't delivered in time.
And there's a bigger reason Ethereum cares about this: ePBS is partly designed to let Ethereum handle larger payloads and more data without forcing everything through today's tight validation window
Why @get_optimum is beneficial for Ethereum ?
Today, Ethereum block building involves builders, relays and proposers. A builder creates a valuable block, a relay helps pass the bid/block along, and the proposer chooses a bid
With ePBS (EIP-7732), Ethereum moves much of this proposer-builder relationship directly into the protocol. That reduces reliance on third-party relays and separates the beacon/consensus block from the heavier execution payload containing transactions
= Today:
Builder → Relay → Proposer → Validators
= With ePBS:
Builder → Proposer
↓
Proposer sends the lighter beacon block
↓
Builder separately sends the heavy payload
═══════════════════
ePBS actually gives the heavy payload more time to travel. Ethereum says the propagation window expands from roughly 2 seconds to about 9 seconds, which can help Ethereum safely handle more data
Where could Optimum fit?
This is where mump2p becomes interesting.
Instead of changing how Ethereum chooses or validates blocks, Optimum is working on the road the data travels on.
So the idea is roughly:
Builder creates payload
↓
mump2p helps propagate it
↓
Payload reaches validators
↓
More time before the deadline
═══════════════════
For builders, that could make fast and reliable networking economically valuable. A winning bid isn't very useful if the corresponding payload isn't delivered in time.
And there's a bigger reason Ethereum cares about this: ePBS is partly designed to let Ethereum handle larger payloads and more data without forcing everything through today's tight validation window