@Steve_in_TO@QuantumTycoon@Will_Tanner_1 Cuba, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama and many more.
Non-egalitarian doesn't equal racist. The quality of life of common citizens in Zimbabwe dramatically decreased after 1979.
@QuantumTycoon@Steve_in_TO@Will_Tanner_1 Agreed with the emphasis on “semi decent”. Even semi decent highly educated and leadership experienced elite in power would create a better society than an egalitarian government because they know how to run things. Egalitarian society is no more than a popularity contest.
@Steve_in_TO@QuantumTycoon@Will_Tanner_1 It certainly did. Are you trying to suggest that handing over power and responsibility to population without any prior experience with power and responsibility is a good idea?
@Steve_in_TO@QuantumTycoon@Will_Tanner_1 Yes. 100%. I don't see why giving the same voting rights to uneducated population susceptible to propaganda could be beneficial to anyone. Also, there's a proof - Rhodesia. They actually did it and look how good they were doing.
@Steve_in_TO@QuantumTycoon@Will_Tanner_1 Are we doing any better because uneducated population has the same voting rights as the educated minority? The whole premise of this post is that egalitarianism is inferior to the rule of wealthy and educated.
@stuartj0hnson @EPRoadsPolicing @SaferEssexRoads@CampaignCycling you wouldn't last a day cycling in a big city if you think this is a close pass. also you're a grown man crying like a baby on the internet. you can do better mate.