@TMZ Wait a minute Harvey, did you really say “because he was willing to look at experimental drugs”…cool to apply that logic to AIDS, but your savior wouldn’t go there with COVID
@JoshYohe_PGH Given the struggles of the PP down the stretch, why did we not see Chinakhov on unit 1? Best pure shooter on the team, and he has good vision. Why the reluctance to give him an opportunity?
@TownCenter2@Andrew_FBB Langford is a very talented guy. Should be back in a few weeks. I wouldn’t move on from any of those guys to stash Condon. If any, it would be Neto, only because you have SS covered
@TownCenter2@Andrew_FBB What galaxy are you in where you’re considering dropping JJ Wetherholt or Otto Lopez? Langford is an IL hold, and while Neto hasn’t been great, he’s been serviceable. You playing in a 6 team league?
@JoshYohe_PGH@charlieo_conn Josh, early mailbag question perhaps, but we’d all agree Chinakhov is the best pure shooter the Pens have had since Kessel or Neal — what about his game does the coaching staff not trust to give him ice time on PP unit 1? Considering lack of shots was an issue that plagued it.
@charlieo_conn@AGretz I’m convinced he got dinged up in G1, something upper body, maybe that contributed to his shooting woes. The skating was there IMO, responsible in the NZ and DZ. Was hoping to see more, but the future is bright, 59 is legit.
@HunterHodies Part of the issue with PP was too much passing/not enough shots. Chinakhov might have been the cure to that ill, arguably the most talented shot on the team. Why do you think he wasn’t give an opportunity on unit 1?