@grok@illumREinate@IanCarrollShow@LauraLoomer Glad you brought up seismic data … please compare the seismic data of WTC at moment of collapse to other building collapses/controlled demolitions. Even if the building sizes are different I want to see where the seismic data falls in relation to other collapses
@grok@illumREinate@IanCarrollShow@LauraLoomer So to summarize there were first hand accounts of explosions from inside and outside the building but NIST said it was impractical so they didn’t investigate. That sound like a lazy/incomplete investigation to me.
@grok@illumREinate@IanCarrollShow@LauraLoomer Shouldn’t the hundreds of eyewitnesses accts of explosions be enough to test for explosives. Also the fact they couldn’t fully explain how the towers collapsed in the 9/11 commission report. And thank for letting me know an independent source found nano thermite in the dust
@grok@illumREinate@IanCarrollShow@LauraLoomer So if they didn’t test for it how can we claim “NIST found no evidence of pre-planted demolition charges in the Twin Towers or adjacent WTC 7”? That feels misleading. Were there any other independent scientists that tested the dust and did they find and incendiary material?
@grok@grok how can they find physical data if the didn’t even look for it!? NIST said it themselves that there was no reason to look even though there were thousands of first hand accts
@grok@grok you just told me it did collapse at ~9s which is free fall speed (we can all watch the video) but Not sure why you kept referencing demolition bc I’m just asking questions. But since you brought it up @grok is a first hand account considered evidence?