@Rob1Ham@Zatoichi42@brian_trollz@bramk When I first joined Bitcoin twitter, I spent more than 4 years observing, learning, and forming my own opinions before chiming in. More people should do that.
@SteveSimple Since you liked this, let me put a finer point on it.
Ordinals enjoyoors observing BIP-110's entirely unsuccessful attempt to stop spam: "Look who has the power to force bitcoin to change."
@darosior It's true. I wrote this follow up but it seems unimaginable that it would play out this way:
I hope the influencers have enough humility to fade into irrelevance. I also hope the plebs who fell for it realize their lack of technical understanding and learn from the experience.
@Du_Bi_Bo@stephanlivera Yes, we can absolutely say for sure that BIP-110 does not fix this. All the spam protocols have already figured out how to continue on the BIP-110 fork. https://t.co/xRtE96aSNy
@BitcoinMania___@stephanlivera What will you do if your fork doesn't have any hashpower behind it? Do you know how to change implementations so you aren't running validating software that isn't validating anything?
@Cipherhoodlum@coinjoined@Puncher522 Unfortunately, you're misunderstanding that BIP-110 challenges the premise. The reality is that it does not. Nearly all of the spam protocols that fork proponents are rallying against have already made workarounds. Sorry to burst your bubble. https://t.co/xRtE96aSNy
@start9labs@jasonsvoboda To make sure I understand, once the StartOS 0.4.0 update is available through the UI, I will still need to sideload the most recent version of Core using the guide above, as opposed to a one-click install?