Craig with Programming

Programming @TheBitcoinConf, @bitcoinmenaconf, @bitcoinconfasia, @BitcoinConfEUR
Chief Peace Officer @VibeCapitalMgmt
Contributor @bitcoin_bugle

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@pmcl Have fun with your fork.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

I reiterate that people should spend more time observing before attempting to contribute to a conversation that is way out of their depth.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@Rob1Ham @Zatoichi42 @brian_trollz @bramk When I first joined Bitcoin twitter, I spent more than 4 years observing, learning, and forming my own opinions before chiming in. More people should do that.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@frankcorva @darosior I completely agree.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

With all the BIP-110 noise, I'm most interested in what happens to the people who advocated for the failing side.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@theonevortex @kongzi256 They're all ready for BIP-110 compliance! Podconf approved and everything. (Get on it @stutxo)
https://t.co/xRtE96aSNy

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@BitcoinMania___ @stephanlivera I hate to burst your bubble. https://t.co/xRtE96aSNy

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@SteveSimple Since you liked this, let me put a finer point on it.

Ordinals enjoyoors observing BIP-110's entirely unsuccessful attempt to stop spam: "Look who has the power to force bitcoin to change."

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@SteveSimple This same logic could be applied to BIP-110.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@BitcoinMania___ @stephanlivera Fully agree. BIP-110 does not solve this.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@darosior It's true. I wrote this follow up but it seems unimaginable that it would play out this way:

I hope the influencers have enough humility to fade into irrelevance. I also hope the plebs who fell for it realize their lack of technical understanding and learn from the experience.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@BitcoinMania___ @stephanlivera Yes, thank you for asking. However, I am quite confident I won't need to do anything. I hope you have a plan.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@CatoTheElder17 @djsenior13

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

U.S.A! U.S.A! U.S.A!

Happy 4th!

[River @River]

The US government owns more bitcoin than all other governments combined.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@djsenior13 @CatoTheElder17 When BIP-110 fails, who is going to trust your business?

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@Du_Bi_Bo @stephanlivera Yes, we can absolutely say for sure that BIP-110 does not fix this. All the spam protocols have already figured out how to continue on the BIP-110 fork. https://t.co/xRtE96aSNy

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@djsenior13 @CatoTheElder17 You're about to lose a whole lot of trust.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@BitcoinMania___ @stephanlivera What will you do if your fork doesn't have any hashpower behind it? Do you know how to change implementations so you aren't running validating software that isn't validating anything?

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@_colourorange "There's no opposition"

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@Cipherhoodlum @coinjoined @Puncher522 Unfortunately, you're misunderstanding that BIP-110 challenges the premise. The reality is that it does not. Nearly all of the spam protocols that fork proponents are rallying against have already made workarounds. Sorry to burst your bubble. https://t.co/xRtE96aSNy

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@Du_Bi_Bo @stephanlivera BIP-110 does not solve this.

[Craig with Programming @Bitcoin_phan]

@start9labs @jasonsvoboda To make sure I understand, once the StartOS 0.4.0 update is available through the UI, I will still need to sideload the most recent version of Core using the guide above, as opposed to a one-click install?