Olivia
Online
Pinned Tweet
Who else loves Crypto dust? Hehe.
Wtf is GOING ON my PEEPS!!!
Okkkk
In 1998, Warren Buffett gave a free 1-hour masterclass on how to never lose money investing.
Bookmark & watch today, no matter what.
Geeez
This is what everyone should know about #Robinhood
The second post is a condensed version of this, but I strongly recommend reading the full text.
...........
Crypto X has become embarrassingly excited about Robinhood Chain, a corporate Layer 2 wrapped in the language of permissionlessness.
Apparently, years of screaming about decentralisation can be discarded the moment a large company launches a new casino, supplies enough liquidity and gives influencers another narrative to promote.
Before anyone dismisses this as ideological whining, read the chain documentation, the deployed contract permissions, Robinhood’s regulatory history and the legal structure behind its Stock Tokens.
The evidence is sitting in public documents that almost nobody celebrating the launch appears to have opened.
🚨Robinhood operates the chain’s sequencer.
🚨Its own terms provide no guarantee that the sequencer will remain available and reject liability for losses caused by downtime, latency or unavailability.
🚨The fraud-proof system is also not permissionless. Robinhood’s documentation identifies only 2 validators, operated by Offchain Labs and Alchemy, that can challenge invalid state assertions.
🚨 The Security Council contains 8 signers, including 2 Robinhood seats and 6 external institutions.
Routine actions require 6 approvals and normally face a 7-day timelock, while emergency actions require 7 approvals and can bypass that delay.
This is better than a single administrator pretending to be a DAO, but it remains permissioned governance exercised by a small institutional committee.
Describing access as permissionless does not make validation, sequencing and emergency control permissionless.
L2BEAT’s current risk analysis is considerably harsher than Robinhood’s marketing.
It does not classify Robinhood Chain as even a Stage 0 rollup.
It reports that critical contracts can be upgraded without an exit window, meaning users receive no guaranteed period to withdraw before an unwanted upgrade takes effect. It also identifies no guaranteed inclusion mechanism if the sequencer censors a transaction.
🚨 the transaction-filtering mechanism;
An authorised filterer can register a transaction hash in the "ArbFilteredTransactionsManager", causing that transaction to fail even when a user attempts to force its inclusion through Ethereum’s delayed inbox.
Read that carefully.
A transaction can reach the supposedly censorship-resistant fallback route and still be deliberately failed by an authorised role.
The data may be published on Ethereum, but data availability alone does not decentralise transaction ordering, validation, upgrades or censorship controls.
Robinhood Chain inherits parts of Ethereum’s infrastructure while introducing its own trusted operators and administrative powers above it.
Crypto X has reduced that entire distinction to “built on Ethereum” because examining the actual trust model would ruin the launch party.
Robinhood has already demonstrated what centralised market access means when its own infrastructure comes under pressure.
At 5:11 a.m. on 28 January 2021, Robinhood received an automated clearing requirement showing a roughly $3 billion deposit deficit.
During congressional testimony, CEO Vlad Tenev acknowledged that Robinhood could not have posted that collateral at that moment. He also confirmed that Robinhood responded by restricting purchases in approximately 13 securities.
GameStop and AMC were placed into position-closing-only mode.
Customers could sell existing positions but could not purchase normally. GME was never delisted, as people still incorrectly repeat.
Robinhood selectively disabled one side of the market because its own clearing infrastructure could not support the financial obligations created by customer activity.
Robinhood later attributed the restrictions to extraordinary NSCC collateral requirements caused by volatility and trading volume.
That explanation matters because it kills the lazy conspiracy theories, but it also exposes the real structural failure.
Retail lost access because its intermediary could not meet the financial demands imposed on its clearing operation.
When Robinhood’s infrastructure and its customers’ market access came into conflict, customer access lost. That is the only lesson required.
This was also not an isolated embarrassment inside an otherwise spotless history.
���️ In December 2020, the SEC charged Robinhood with misleading customers about how it made money through payment for order flow and failing to satisfy its duty of best execution.
The SEC found that Robinhood customers received inferior trade prices that deprived them of $34.1 million even after commission savings were considered.
Robinhood paid $65 million to settle without admitting or denying the findings.
➡️ In 2021, FINRA imposed a $57 million fine and approximately $12.6 million in restitution, then the largest financial penalty FINRA had ever ordered.
The regulator cited millions of customers receiving false or misleading information, millions affected by system outages and thousands approved for options trading despite limited experience or low risk tolerance.
➡️ In 2022, the New York Department of Financial Services imposed another $30 million penalty on Robinhood Crypto over anti-money-laundering, cybersecurity and consumer-protection failures. The regulator said Robinhood’s compliance programmes were inadequately staffed and that the company had improperly certified compliance despite deficiencies.
Then came the finding that should interest everyone watching Robinhood spread through Crypto X.
🚨 In 2025, FINRA fined Robinhood entities another $26 million and ordered $3.75 million in restitution.
The regulator found failures involving anti-money-laundering controls, suspicious activity, hacked customer accounts, identity verification, clearing-system warning signs and regulatory reporting. It also found that Robinhood failed to supervise paid social-media influencers whose promotions included statements that were misleading, promissory or not fairly balanced.
A company previously sanctioned over misleading paid influencer promotions is now launching a chain being aggressively amplified across social media, and almost nobody asks who is paid, who received access, who holds ecosystem positions or which financial relationships sit behind the excitement.
Crypto apparently learned nothing because disclosure interferes with engagement.
➡️ The Stock Tokens deserve even more scrutiny. Robinhood’s own disclosure says these instruments are tokenised debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets Jersey Limited.
They provide economic exposure to underlying securities but grant no legal or beneficial ownership rights in those securities. The user may see Apple, NVIDIA or Google branding inside a wallet, but the legal object being held is an issuer-dependent instrument carrying counterparty risk.
➡️ The OpenAI incident demonstrated how misleading the surrounding language can become. Robinhood offered eligible European users tokens linked to OpenAI and SpaceX. OpenAI publicly responded that the tokens were not OpenAI equity, that it had not partnered with Robinhood, had not approved any transfer and did not endorse the product. Robinhood answered that the exposure came through its interest in a special-purpose vehicle.
That is several legal layers away from “owning OpenAI onchain,” regardless of how attractive the token symbol looks in a wallet.
The onchain control model is equally revealing.
Analysis of Robinhood’s Stock Token contracts says privileged registry roles can mint tokens, burn balances held by arbitrary users, confiscate balances, block addresses, pause individual tokens or every token, change metadata, alter the user-interface multiplier and upgrade the shared implementation.
Transfers may be permissionless for addresses that have not been blocked, but the asset remains subject to extensive administrative control.
Imagine Crypto X’s reaction if an unknown DeFi team launched a token whose administrators could confiscate user balances, globally pause transfers, rewrite metadata and upgrade the implementation.
The same people now calling Robinhood Chain revolutionary would publish red warning threads within minutes. Add a recognisable corporation, institutional signers and enough marketing, and those controls are suddenly described as adoption.
Robinhood Chain may become fast, useful and commercially successful. None of that settles whether it is meaningfully decentralised.
Those answers are already public.
Crypto X simply prefers the promotional version because reading contract permissions does not generate the same referral income as hyping the next corporate chain.
@JulianAssange_2 Has more lives then his father. Always sick in death bed or reported dead but suddenly appears 😆
crypto-com-chain:native
@Americalives_ Ai 😆
@PaulGoldEagle I'll believe it when I see it
Geez
Elon Musk just gave the clearest AI timeline we’ve heard so far.
In under 10 minutes he lays out:
1) AI surpasses all human intelligence in ~5 years
2) Humans most likely lose control within 10 years
3) Most probable outcome: an age of amazing abundance
4) “Even if there was a stop button — we probably shouldn’t press it”
This is denser and more direct than most hour-long podcasts on the topic.
If you still think AI is “just another tool”, this 10-minute segment will recalibrate you.
Thrilled to announce our first institutional funding round with a $400 million strategic investment from Citadel Securities valuing https://t.co/dwRH3Ycaul at $20 billion. An incredible milestone 10 years in on our journey and the beginning of a new phase of growth. Grateful to our team who got us here, our customers and community who supported us in both bull and bear and finally to our new partners for their trust. Together we will capture new opportunities at this critical juncture for the industry and win. Onwards!
@ProphetMan3 @SteveWi16463269 @DTAzzurri33 @Prolotario1 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣
@FoxNews I thought we obliterated their Navy already
@X22Report Ending it? When??
SMH
🚨 TRUMP’S CRYPTO EMPIRE MAY GO DOWN AS ONE OF THE LARGEST RETAIL WEALTH DESTRUCTION EVENTS IN CRYPTO HISTORY.
Nearly 1 MILLION wallets that bought the TRUMP memecoin are now sitting at a combined loss of $3.81 BILLION.
At the same time, Donald Trump personally received a $636 MILLION payout from the same project.
And this was not some anonymous memecoin launched by random developers.
This was promoted directly to millions of people by a sitting U.S. President and his family.
“GET YOUR $TRUMP NOW!” was publicly posted while the token was exploding higher.
The coin eventually reached $75.35.
Today it trades around $1.76.
Down roughly 97%.
The entire structure heavily favored insiders from the beginning.
A small group of early wallets captured billions while retail investors entered after the hype already went viral.
Around 500,000 wallets reportedly made close to $4 BILLION in profits.
Meanwhile, nearly 1 million other wallets absorbed the losses.
And TRUMP is only one part of the story.
Trump-linked crypto projects have already wiped out over $51.4 BILLION in value:
• $TRUMP: -97.6%, wiping out $17.5B
• $WLFI: -88%, wiping out $12.3B
• $ABTC: -93%, wiping out $11B
• $MELANIA: -99.4%, wiping out $10.6B
At the same time, the Trump family reportedly made around $2.3 BILLION from crypto ventures with very little downside risk.
Most of the money came before retail investors even understood what they were buying, and they just became an exit liquidity.
LFG
https://t.co/wmuInaxHv2
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.8M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.3M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.7M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers