LΞCOUR

The Caviar of Body Art
25 years turning skin into fashion 🎨
Live | Hand-Painted Wearable Luxury
Transitioning back to old handle @caviarofbodyart
Coming soon

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

This chapter closes, a bigger one begins.

For the past few years I’ve used @bitcouture for crypto, AI & digital fashion R&D.

But my real journey started in 2001 on Front Street Lahaina, Maui.

After 25 years of turning skin into living fashion — I’m stepping fully into my artist name:

→ **LECOUR | The Caviar of Body Art**

I’ve requested my original 2011 handle @caviarofbodyart and will move the full brand there once approved.

In the meantime, I’ll be sharing the complete story here:
• Body painting & fashion making
• Underwater fashion film
• Island vibes & process videos
• Live streaming coming soon

Thank you for following along.
New era starts now 🎨🌴

https://t.co/4tleJkiOBk

📸 Kelly Hsiao
Model: Alohi

[Harsh hada @Theharshhada7]

Someone rich once told me:
"Money loves water."

It took me years to understand...

[jack @JackDorsey0x]

https://t.co/UZAkUJAczb

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

@JackDorsey0x https://t.co/Rr86bVUk9k

[PORKMEMER 🐷🟪 Geoff.ai Pond0x.com @PorkMemer]

https://t.co/TcIWuJurXy⚡️

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

@JackDorsey0x Geoff isn’t real.

https://t.co/Rr86bVUk9k

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

https://t.co/Rr86bVUk9k

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

https://t.co/Rr86bVUk9k

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

@JackDorsey0x Geoff isn’t real.

https://t.co/Rr86bVUk9k

[jack @JackDorsey0x]

Geoff isn’t real.

https://t.co/UZAkUJzEJD

[$DMT-NAT @natgmi]

• Hashrate: SpiderPool weaponizes $NAT on their front page.

• Institutions: TradingView officially indexes DMT-NAT/USD.

• Exchanges: KuCoin publishes 4th educational article on DMT.

​The foundational pillars of the Second Subsidy are fully online. 🚀

[Codie Sanchez @Codie_Sanchez]

There will only be two types of business owners in the next 5 years:

1) The tech-enabled operator: uses AI to scale with fewer people and lower costs than ever.
2) The premium artisan: goes all in on human touch and commands higher prices because of it.

Everyone sitting in the middle dies.

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

@JackDorsey0x https://t.co/Rr86bVUk9k

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

@JackDorsey0x https://t.co/Rr86bVUk9k

[Tom Green @tomgreenlive]

Good morning!!

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

@JackDorsey0x https://t.co/Rr86bVUk9k

[jack @JackDorsey0x]

You can already have AI automatically do most of your daily tasks at this point…

I don’t operate like that yet.

I’m still inefficient.

I am still human.

[LΞCOUR @bitcouture]

@JackDorsey0x https://t.co/Rr86bVUk9k

[jack @JackDorsey0x]

This account is funny because it is permanently shadowbanned and I cannot listen to or host spaces.

[ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 @TheBlockRunner]

NFTs died for a reason. We found the fix.

Before pushing @natdotfun live, we break down our personal experience developing https://t.co/inMF4EwURV in an attempt to join the company of other crypto native projects that have achieved product-market fit.

We also explain why old NFT launches were broken, and why Solana rails + Bitcoin anchoring might actually work.

Watch👇
THE OLD MODEL DIED. NOW WHAT? | Our Predictions for DMT and https://t.co/inMF4EwURV | TBR #315

Episode 315 is really a thesis episode about what counts as real product-market fit in crypto and why so few projects ever reach it. We use names like @tether, @circle, and @HyperliquidX to set the bar, not because we are copying those businesses, but because those examples prove the market does eventually reward products that solve something concrete. That creates the central tension running through the conversation: if most crypto revenue is concentrated in only a handful of serious systems, then anything new has to earn attention through substance, not just narrative, aesthetics, or timing.

From there, the episode opens into a broader discussion about structural problems people would rather ignore until they become unavoidable. We connect crypto incentives to a wider world that is already being reshaped by AI, labor disruption, and rapidly changing market behavior. That thread matters because it explains how they think about $NAT. Not as a gimmick or a short-lived trade, but as an attempt to engage with an uncomfortable problem early, while most people still prefer easier stories.

The heart of the conversation is the NFT thesis. The argument is that NFTs did not fail because digital ownership itself was meaningless. They failed because the original economic design was broken. Creators were rewarded too early, communities absorbed too much downside, and once the initial sale was over the alignment between builder and holder degraded fast. The alternative we describe is a model where creators stay financially connected to what happens afterward, so long-term progress, participation, and community growth matter more than a one-time extraction event.

That idea becomes more powerful in an AI-native environment where more people can create, more content can be produced, and attention becomes even less reliable as a signal of value. A recurring theme in the episode is that better systems should help creators and markets discover viability earlier, while keeping the feedback loop alive after the initial speculation. The discussion around community participation, UNAT distribution, and ongoing alignment points toward a platform that tries to turn market interest into something more durable than hype.

The final layer is the infrastructure thesis underneath all of it. We explain why we want the speed and usability of @solana, while keeping the deeper supply logic and source of truth anchored to Bitcoin through DMT. In our view, Solana makes the experience usable, but Bitcoin gives the system a stronger substrate than most digital assets can claim. That combination is what gives the episode its bigger point of view. This is not just an argument for better NFTs. It is an argument that creator tools, token design, and base-layer credibility all matter more when they reinforce each other instead of pulling in different directions.