The OG Bitstorian. History PhD. A professor @Binghamtonu. Editor @bitcoinbooksrev Past Senior Fellow @BTCpolicyorg. Scholar @FulbrightPrgrm Grad @BTCstartuplab
¡Queridos seguidores!
Nos complace anunciaros que ya se encuentra disponible en acceso abierto nuestra aportación para el monográfico especial "The Algorithmic Turn: AI and the Transformation of the Study of the Past" de la Revista de Historiografía (RevHisto) (n.º 41, 2026).
@HalachaBench Cool stuff. We're running similar tests in our "Religion & AI" course this semester here in NY. Our results are remarkably parallel, so there' seems to be strong data patterns emerging. Now we're tinkering with building bots to do this better and to perform religious functions.
Money is an abstraction of power. Make your own slice of authority. Real democracy is now possible. No more whining about politics. Be free, or choose not to be, but know that it’s a choice.
GM!
The world runs on promises, panic, and power.
Bitcoin answers to none of them.
Learn to govern yourself, and build on what no ruler can print.
Sovereignty is the way...
Election season reminds me of Rousseau's saying (in paraphrase) to "distrust those who go searching far off for duties they disdain to fulfill around them. Such a person projects love of the distant abstract person so as to be excused from loving his neighbors."
“Judging it to be a sign of plebeian baseness to think the same as everybody else, and a signal mark of expertise to destroy what has been approved of by all in common”-Edict of Honorius (Coll. Qu. 491B) complaining about Pelagians & their wild idea of total personal sovereignty.
Over 391 years ago (1635), my alma mater @BostLatinSchool was founded by the residents of Boston in a Town Meeting, in open vote, as a public school to prevent the sin of ignorance. To me, Bitcoin education & open-source dev are the continuation of this grand, American tradition.
@TechManTy@SoloSatoshi And votes. “Support me in not supporting you, please.” Elections are their consensus mechanism. Voting is verifying their work (no matter who you vote for). All votes are a vote for fiat.
Fellow Bitcoiners, fun fact: women can see orange better than men. Not only that, but some women (tetrachromats) have an extra type of cone cell in their retinas sensitive to orange-yellow (everyone else has only red, blue and green) and can see 99 million more colors than us.
Are you going to rubber-stamp the fiat system again next month or help build a Bitcoin standard? The choice is simple. Participating in the fiat system's election (its consensus mechanism) is a vote for fiat, period. Money is simply an abstraction of power, the State's or yours?