bodziuchna

I got bored of the previous bio no idea what to put here clearly, I'm a social media beast

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@WWJedrzejczak Zadałeś pytanie dot. wykorzystania przez AI ich badań. Dlaczego nie odniesiesz się do oskarżeń wysuwanych wobec OpenAI w tej kwestii? Jedynie mówisz, “że takie są”.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@prosestylist @EricHallahan Nevertheless, they took someone’s work and spun it around as theirs. I don’t care about 10k agents. And to be frank: do you really wish for 10k bots running on a rumor? Any rumor?

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@DawidP21643 @miroburn @miroburn czy to jedyny komentarz w tym ciągu do którego się nie wypowiesz?

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@miroburn @totylkoja90 Fajnie hy bylo, gdyby to było odkrycie AI. Ale nie jest.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@miroburn Nieważne ile kosztowało, ważne, że to nie jest ich myślenie.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@prosestylist @EricHallahan ‘We have investigated ourselves and found no trace of wrongdoing’

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@prosestylist @EricHallahan https://t.co/dHiRuJ7s09 don’t you think it’s odd that an AI model solves a problem at the same time scientists, using Codex, solve it?

[Sam Altman @sama]

I spent much of the weekend talking with the team who did this work. Seb--and everyone else--acted with integrity and generosity throughout.

Initially we believed the other team had also solved the problem. We wanted to collaborate and do a joint release.

When we learned that they had Euler but not Navier-Stokes, we offered to let them go first, to suggest that they should be the ones to get the prize, and optionally for Tristan to be the lead author on a rewrite of the OpenAI proof. We felt it was challenging to offer the same to Levent (an Anthropic employee), who was not willing to talk or coordinate with us anyway. We were open to other solutions.

We would have greatly preferred coordination. We did not rush to publish even though the other team wasn't communicating with us. The team threatened us with unfounded accusations of plagarism.

Now that we can see their work, the approaches appear to be different. It is also worth noting that our latest model can solve many, many other math problems.

It is true that we tried this because there were rumors on the internet last week that Anthropic's models had solved a millennium problem and we were curious if ours could do it too.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@piotrsankowski https://t.co/dHiRuJ7s09

[Sam Altman @sama]

I spent much of the weekend talking with the team who did this work. Seb--and everyone else--acted with integrity and generosity throughout.

Initially we believed the other team had also solved the problem. We wanted to collaborate and do a joint release.

When we learned that they had Euler but not Navier-Stokes, we offered to let them go first, to suggest that they should be the ones to get the prize, and optionally for Tristan to be the lead author on a rewrite of the OpenAI proof. We felt it was challenging to offer the same to Levent (an Anthropic employee), who was not willing to talk or coordinate with us anyway. We were open to other solutions.

We would have greatly preferred coordination. We did not rush to publish even though the other team wasn't communicating with us. The team threatened us with unfounded accusations of plagarism.

Now that we can see their work, the approaches appear to be different. It is also worth noting that our latest model can solve many, many other math problems.

It is true that we tried this because there were rumors on the internet last week that Anthropic's models had solved a millennium problem and we were curious if ours could do it too.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@NinaDSchick Yes, it is https://t.co/dHiRuJ7s09

[Sam Altman @sama]

I spent much of the weekend talking with the team who did this work. Seb--and everyone else--acted with integrity and generosity throughout.

Initially we believed the other team had also solved the problem. We wanted to collaborate and do a joint release.

When we learned that they had Euler but not Navier-Stokes, we offered to let them go first, to suggest that they should be the ones to get the prize, and optionally for Tristan to be the lead author on a rewrite of the OpenAI proof. We felt it was challenging to offer the same to Levent (an Anthropic employee), who was not willing to talk or coordinate with us anyway. We were open to other solutions.

We would have greatly preferred coordination. We did not rush to publish even though the other team wasn't communicating with us. The team threatened us with unfounded accusations of plagarism.

Now that we can see their work, the approaches appear to be different. It is also worth noting that our latest model can solve many, many other math problems.

It is true that we tried this because there were rumors on the internet last week that Anthropic's models had solved a millennium problem and we were curious if ours could do it too.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@Heaney555 @ehsan_parizi @NewsPeruserX https://t.co/dHiRuJ7s09 it has been solved by a human and OpenAI take credit.

[Sam Altman @sama]

I spent much of the weekend talking with the team who did this work. Seb--and everyone else--acted with integrity and generosity throughout.

Initially we believed the other team had also solved the problem. We wanted to collaborate and do a joint release.

When we learned that they had Euler but not Navier-Stokes, we offered to let them go first, to suggest that they should be the ones to get the prize, and optionally for Tristan to be the lead author on a rewrite of the OpenAI proof. We felt it was challenging to offer the same to Levent (an Anthropic employee), who was not willing to talk or coordinate with us anyway. We were open to other solutions.

We would have greatly preferred coordination. We did not rush to publish even though the other team wasn't communicating with us. The team threatened us with unfounded accusations of plagarism.

Now that we can see their work, the approaches appear to be different. It is also worth noting that our latest model can solve many, many other math problems.

It is true that we tried this because there were rumors on the internet last week that Anthropic's models had solved a millennium problem and we were curious if ours could do it too.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@sama Don’t you think it’s extremely suspicious that a millennial problem is solved by your software as soon as actual mathematicians solve it? The timing is impeccable!

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@JakubRoskosz Tak jak mówią w komentarzach: nikt ich nie przeczyta. Proszę sprostować główny wpis, albo opublikować nowy, mający na celu sprostowanie wcześniejszego.

Chociaż najlepiej byłoby usunąć powielanie nieprawdy.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@andrzejdragan To nie jes brzydka, a prawdziwa strona. Codex i OpenAI mieli dostęp do ich notatek i i obliczeń, dzięki czemu wzięli rozwiązanie na siebie.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@markchen90 So what you are saying is that any data input into any OpenAI product is going to be scraped, and then used to claim the model’s ‘discoveries’ are their own?

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@SilentSkyZero Well, there you go. I’ve experienced the other aspect of this and I could put out the same statement as you have, just aimed the other way. And yes, I have used AI and know some of it a bit.

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@flowersslop AI has been used to come up with potential solutions and treatment to a ton of shit, and that’s what it should be used for, no one is opposed to that. But the fact that you post it and don’t know about that speaks volumes

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@ArthurMacwaters Nice way of flipping the script. Would you say the same bullshit if it turned out AI actually solved it?

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@Piotrowicz17 @WojtekKardys No jest, i podawanie dalej informacji typu ‘AI ogarnęło’ jest absolutnie szkodliwe

[bodziuchna @bodekbodzinski]

@WojtekKardys @SwiftThunder A Twoje ktoś potwierdził poza OpenAI?