I’m satisfied that I committed to include a chapter on the Jews in this work. Indeed, it may be that Jews wander across all of its pages, even if it’s all apropos of nothing, for their lot and this great theatre is merely a tiny lightning in the storm.
https://t.co/yDq3WNYL3h
The post below by @doctor_rahmeh
(a British doctor, apparently) is pure undiluted Jew-hatred (antisemitism). It's as bad as anything the Nazis ever stated or published; e.g. "The Jews are our misfortune!"
The world—not just the Jews—is going to need help.
@doctor_rahmeh "The world's biggest mistake was allowing them to have centralised, consolidated power. Now we are witnessing the manifestation of the teachings our ancestors warned us about."
Nazi slogan: "The Jews are our misfortune!"
You keep great company. Sick.
https://t.co/ivuHVBlQkG
Ben-Gvir is not a new phenomenon.
This is exactly how they've always viewed the rest of humanity.
The world's biggest mistake was allowing them to have centralised, consolidated power.
Now we are witnessing the manifestation of the teachings our ancestors warned us about.
@alon_mizrahi Just imagine if you were the top man. President of the U.S.A or, more to your fancy perhaps, President or Iran or its Supreme Leader.
Imagine what world you'd be living in. The happiness you would spread.
@mehdirhasan@mehdirhasan reacts to Israelites being killed.
It doesn't matter who kills them, why or where or how, whenever it happens, @mehdirhasan shoots from the hip to legitimise it.
But he is no "antisemite"—Got nought against Jews. He just doesn't mind when they come to grief.
@owenjonesjourno Dina Moe Humm's in preaching form today:
"These people must be driven from public life and never heard from again."
Echoes of "All animals are equal but some are more equal than others", or the first great decree of tyranny.
Dina Moe Humm's pro-democracy but to a degree.
@EylonALevy Could it already be the time when they no longer need his "Jewish services"; the time of dispensing of him like the effluvium that he is?
Seems a bit soon.
@owenjonesjourno Dina Moe Humm's in preaching form today:
"These people must be driven from public life and never heard from again."
Echoes of "All animals are equal but some are more equal than others", or the first great decree of tyranny.
Dina Moe Humm's pro-democracy but to a degree.
@owenjonesjourno With J. Vance's now on side, Dina Moe Humm apes old Nazi J. Garbage:
"The Jews will pay with extermination of their race in Europe and perhaps beyond".
Luscious dreams of trampling down the Israelites.
It's nothing new—But still stinks all the same.
https://t.co/UVVLPDkv2S
So many cheered on Israel as it committed every unspeakable war crime
They did so despite overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence
They did so because Israel's impunity extended to them
They must now realise Israel's impunity will end, and therefore their impunity will end too
@amjadt25 "A person who abandons an ally halfway and cuts deals behind their back is not someone you call in a crisis."
Indeed.
"Though those that are betrayed do feel the treason sharply, yet the traitor stands in worse case of woe." W.S
@mehdirhasan@mehdirhasan dotes on the word "antisemite", usually by an exclamation mark, no doubt to drive home the point he thinks he's making; that is that he—definitely a non-Jew—is blessed with a thorough expertise of what does and does not constitute Jew-hatred.
It takes one.
For the lazy/dodgy eyesight amongst us:
The Grok Summary:
No, Zack Polanski was not cleared on the council tax issue itself.
The photo in Dan Neidle’s post is a screenshot from the GLA (Greater London Authority) Monitoring Officer’s report on complaints about Polanski (Green Party leader and London Assembly member).
Summary of the photo (key excerpts):
• It explains that actions on council tax in an official capacity (e.g., voting on GLA budgets) don’t create a disclosable interest tied to his personal living arrangements.
• Paragraph 28 explicitly notes: “Whether he does owe council tax, and if so how much, are currently subject to investigation by the London Borough of Waltham Forest and so are yet to be determined.”
• Conclusion (paras 29-30): Polanski’s council tax/houseboat arrangements were “private behaviour in his personal capacity.” They did not fall under the GLA Code of Conduct, so “no further action can be taken on these complaints.”
Bottom line:
• The GLA probe only addressed whether this was a breach of conduct rules as an Assembly member → dismissed on technical/jurisdictional grounds (personal, not official).
• It does not resolve or clear the underlying question of whether he owed (and still owes) council tax on the houseboat. That is still being investigated by Waltham Forest Council. @i
Owen Jones’ accompanying post (with the headline screenshot) frames it as “cleared,” but as Dan Neidle points out, that’s misleading without reading the full report. The tax liability remains open.