@anthonyboutall I do not like Trump and somehow that answer makes me like him more. I donโt relate. But something about the level of authenticity is admirable.
Made with Claude Opus 5.5.
The fearmongering about AI always makes us forget that NOTHING WENT FOOM, as was always predicted.
Send this to your doomer friend who has a very high P(Doom).
Accelerate.
@BraedendotTECH You really need to use a tool that doesnโt require you to use separate terminal windows and you really need to use auto mode or dangerously skip permissions. That way your brain can melt much more efficiently.
@mattpocockuk I ignore the code for a while and then point a sota model at the codebase and have it read your skills or books like asopd for several iterations and make it better. Gpt looped for 3.5 days on my codebase finding seams, breaking them, and writing tests.
@mattpocockuk Imo, invisible losses are too costly and 2% better or worse judgement over many decisions compounds. If the value you get from the tokens exceeds their cost, then I donโt care. Iโd rather throw more compute at a problem and save time.
@myprasanna@vorflux@Rippling Looks pretty incredible. My bottleneck is iterating quickly when building apps that are Agent native and updating my eval harness to keep up.
@elvissun I dont think the demo gif helps. I actually had to spend a couple minutes understanding the difference and which you were saying is better. BUT a dedicated "our ai vs their ai" carries a lot of weight. I would read that description if evaluating products.
@elvissun Found you yesterday. I spent all day on your article and I've come back to this tweet a few times. Can't wait for another article with more detail. ๐
@Steve8708 Why would you use this instead of having the agent do it via Agent browser or playwright? If itโs for the commentary, I can dictate my commentary to the agent, and it can be far more thorough in reproducing the bug and checking edge cases.