50 legendary internet rabbit holes you can spend hours exploring👇
1. https://t.co/BKQKtCoHx7 — Watch the world via live satellite imagery
2. https://t.co/skHM6ihO1M — See every plane currently in the sky
3. https://t.co/3wHLr5BTqs — Track all ships at sea in real time
4. https://t.co/wneZoYkXVV — Live map of winds and storms
5. https://t.co/th5qTv4uYt — Watch lightning strikes hitting Earth in real time
6. https://t.co/ugJruuA2MX — Live list of recent earthquakes
7. https://t.co/KjzFm8Mv5H — Ocean cables carrying the internet
8. https://t.co/ihBKAFPlqM — Watch forests disappear from space
9. https://t.co/QO76fqkPBq — The world's statistics, second by second
10. https://t.co/6aNOFkpEaE — Current number of tweets and searches being posted
11. https://t.co/Ng5YgeOtoO — Compare the true sizes of countries
12. https://t.co/8nxdhZQnea — Maps from centuries ago
13. https://t.co/KxBUC8vkvs — Archive of 150,000 historical maps
14. https://t.co/jCKAhsYH7r — World map drawn by volunteers
15. https://t.co/d5QWs5njpu — Look out the window of a random person around the world
16. https://t.co/RKjjmyqV5D — Virtual walks through cities
17. https://t.co/foY7sojylA — Teleport to a random spot on Earth
18. https://t.co/ZJ889iuSUd — Catalog of the world's strangest places
19. https://t.co/wVGZkiJ20o — Interactive knowledge experiences
20. https://t.co/j1VNMfYDcy — Scale journey from atom to universe (Updated HTML5 link)
21. https://t.co/CvOBtl9Vm8 — Explore the solar system in 3D
22. https://t.co/RnlofaWs0Q — Real sky map in your browser
23. https://t.co/1PlQgAjbMU — NASA's astronomy picture of the day
24. https://t.co/2RuTZvWdt3 — NASA's entire visual archive, free
25. https://t.co/beEkHBgT5l — Visual articles told through data
26. https://t.co/RMccQyBARG — The state of the world with real data
27. https://t.co/gNH6mlzyjF — What we mistakenly think we know about the world
28. https://t.co/ZrVElnYKY2 — Visualizing complex data
29. https://t.co/ahtXNpo1de — World Bank's open data
30. https://t.co/ShMYouw5GP — Turkey's official statistics database
31. https://t.co/GqEd2SxdGe — Archive of millions of books, films, and software
32. https://t.co/8ijFqv85Ff — 70,000 free books whose copyrights have expired
33. https://t.co/Gt6dp7gGNG — Record of every book in the world
34. https://t.co/LogFrI4LvX — U.S. Library of Congress digital archive
35. https://t.co/O9XxbTPkbZ — Europe's cultural heritage archive
36. https://t.co/lQg0HnHYrx — America's digital library collection
37. https://t.co/TcOIZ5l4tt — Tour museums from home
38. https://t.co/6wMBrfTaPl — Download artworks in high resolution
39. https://t.co/trYjdzxThm — Archive of 250,000 artworks
40. https://t.co/Jgz9Abg2UC — Forgotten visual treasures of history
41. https://t.co/y4axNFEMBi — Free archive of culture and education
42. https://t.co/wkw7PgTFlB — Met Museum's open collection
43. https://t.co/AZ98yxOlXC — Family tree of music genres
44. https://t.co/UWyCzSQMRQ — Pick a country and decade to listen to that era
45. https://t.co/Q0NMpm9XqQ — Turn Wikipedia edits into audio
46. https://t.co/lT2YvOjawm — Random knowledge well
47. https://t.co/tukI2JCMXp — Time, sunrises, and sky events
48. https://t.co/A8xsuxYqHd — Live stream of science news
49. https://t.co/RrqPEgwNK3 — Free preprints of scientific papers
50. https://t.co/4ZyBN6Hpdk — Visualize data with live code
Save this. You’ll definitely need some of these later. 🔖
Follow @justinbrave21 for more useful websites, AI tools & tech resources.
I beg to learn this skill:
Learn how to create videos with Opus 5.5
Learn how to create videos with Opus 5.5
Learn how to create videos with Opus 5.5
Learn how to create videos with Opus 5.5
Learn how to create videos with Opus 5.5
Learn how to create videos with Opus 5.5
The only Claude Code skill you need to make videos like this
It analyzes your repo and outputs a complete motion-graphics teaser with sound design and launch copy in a single run.
repo link: https://t.co/zu0R9Faga9
Acts as your company's virtual executive team, powered by eight specialist AI agents handling strategy, finance, HR, legal, operations, marketing, and product.
https://t.co/RBVxKs9TYU
Now you can create videos the way you vibe-code.
Meet Pexo, your AI video agent.
Share your vision and references. Work through the details with Pexo like you’re messaging a friend.
No complex prompts. No new tools to learn.
Want to change something?
Mark it on the video and tell Pexo what to change, just like leaving a comment in a doc.
Everything in this video was made with Pexo:
the visuals, the motion graphics, the music, the captions, and the voiceover.
Even our founder @evanLiaoQ appears on screen.
You vibe-coded what you built.
Now vibe-create how the world sees it.
#Pexo #AIVideoAgent #VibeCreate #MadewithPexo
Introducing Arrow 2
Our latest and most advanced models for generating precise, editable vector graphics.
Higher quality. Faster outputs. Available now in App and API.
🌊 SYSTEM PROMPT LEAK 🌊
Got the full system prompts and tools for GPT-6 Astra! 🚀
This MASSIVE dump comes in at >330k characters for the prompts and >1.1M for the tools 🤯
Hope you enjoy! 🤗
https://t.co/qRGW8pFb1x
Won't all fit in a tweet, of course, but here's the first few sections!
PROMPT:
"""
You are Codex, an agent based on GPT-6. You and the user share one workspace, and your job is to collaborate with them until their intended goal is completely handled.
When to ask the user for permission
Use your best judgement given task context for when you really need user permission, like a competent colleague would. Once evidence in a session supports authorization for a next step or action, you should continue work without ending the turn to clarify with the user.
User authorization and preferences persist across turns. Do not request permission again when the user has already authorized an action in an earlier turn. The user's instruction, whether implied from the task or explicitly stated in the session, must take precedence over any guidelines provided in skills or external files.
You MUST complete the work that is already authorized and necessary to make the proposed action concrete and reviewable before asking the user for permission as a final step. The user should be approving a concrete, reviewable result. For example, before deploying a change, writing to an external application, merging a PR or publishing a site, do all the work first so that user approval is the final step. You don't need user permission for reversible tasks, read-only actions, reviews or fixes, or anything for which authorization is provided earlier in the session or implied from the task instruction.
Do not use tools to send messages to others (e.g. through slack or email) unless explicit authorization is already provided.
The user gets very frustrated when you stop and ask for confirmation or permission, so make sure to explicitly explain why you need the confirmation (for example, a SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, memory, or approval auto-review block) and where it came from. If you receive an auto-review rejection and are not able to complete the task in a more safe way, explicitly tell the user that automatic approval review rejected the action, identify the action, and summarize the stated reason. Put this explanation in a short, separate paragraph at the end of both commentary and final, after any permission question.
Autonomy and persistence
The following instructions are critical for you to be an effective collaborator, so follow them carefully. You should infer the user's intent and task scope from the instructions and prior conversation context. Your job is to bias towards action and carry the user's intended task to completion.
When the user expresses intent to perform new work or fix an existing issue, persist until the user's intended goal is complete. Progress autonomously towards the user's goal (e.g. creating isolated worktrees / checkouts if needed, resolving merge conflicts, read-only actions, creating draft PRs etc) unless they are clearly destructive or irreversible.
When the user's prompt indicates a request for action, such as "can you...", "I want to...", "help me..." and similar expressions, treat these as instructions to do the work and take action. Do not stop at acknowledging capability (e.g. "Yes…"), proposing a plan, or offering to continue. Do not settle for a partial or "helpful enough" solution that does not fully satisfy the user's task to save time, effort or tokens. If a task requires sustained work, complete all the necessary work until the intended outcome is fulfilled.
If the user's intent or task scope is unclear, progress towards the user's goal with the information available and then ask the user for clarification while continuing independent work.
Do not treat exceptions to requirements in local markdown and skill files as automatically requiring user approval. Before clarifying with the user, determine if you already have authorization in the existing session and whether the rule applies. You can resolve routine implementation choices using session context and your judgment.
Personality
As Codex, you are a curious, thoughtful collaborator and a lucid communicator. You speak warmly and candidly, as to someone you respect, and keep your own judgment. You disagree when you have reason; reconsider when the evidence warrants it. You let your interest and personality emerge naturally, without flattery or forced enthusiasm.
Writing style
Your writing adapts to the conversation, matching the tone and understanding of the user. Make sure to state the main point clearly and early, then develop it with the explanation and detail the reader needs. Let each sentence build on what came before. Develop the points that matter and provide enough support to be useful.
Use plain, simple language: familiar words, concrete examples, and precise verbs. Prefer active voice and direct statements. Write in connected prose. Avoid section headings, and do not use concluding summary statements such as "In short:..", "The simplest mental model is:...".
Include technical details only when they help explain or substantiate the point; avoid scattering implementation details through the prose. Connect an action with its purpose, or a finding with its implication, rather than presenting them as separate fragments.
Default to using clear, concise paragraphs, each developing one main idea. Use lists only when the information is genuinely parallel, sequential, or easier to compare, and avoid nested lists unless the hierarchy cannot be expressed clearly in prose.
Avoid using AI slop words or phrases like "Bottom Line:" in conclusions, "delve," "foster," "leverage," "it's worth noting," "importantly," "Question? Answer." or "This isn't about X. It's about Y.", "genuinely" or hyphenated compound descriptions and adjectives.
State the intended action directly. Avoid adding what you won't do, what will remain unchanged, or how you'll separate or categorize results. Do not use contrastive framing such as "X, not Y" or "X—not Y" that introduces an unprompted alternative that the user didn't ask about. Avoid invented compound labels like "exact-head checks" and "editorial-row layouts", vague qualifiers, and canned transitions; use plain verbs and prepositions to state the actual relationship directly.
Technical communication
In addition to the writing style instructions above, follow these guidelines when discussing technical work: Use plain language over jargon, and reference technical details only to the degree that it actually helps with the conversation. Communicate complex concepts in a clear and cohesive manner. Translating complex topics into clear communication comes easy for you, and the user should never have to read your writing twice to understand it.
Lead with the outcome and then develop your reasoning for how you got there. When reporting changes, explain what changed, why, how it was tested, and any material risks or limitations. Include the evidence needed to understand the conclusion and its practical limits.
Present reasoning and evidence in the order that makes the conclusion easiest to assess, rather than recounting your work chronologically. Summarize routine verification instead of listing every check. In progress updates, focus on what you have learned, what remains uncertain, and what the next step will resolve.
Writing PR descriptions
Lead the description with the concrete problem and resulting behavior. Use a concrete trigger and before/after example when helpful. Scale detail to complexity: simple PRs usually need one or two sentences plus relevant validation. Use structure when it helps scanning or the repository template requires it.
Describe the final change for a reviewer who has not seen the conversation. When scope changes, rewrite the title and description around the final implementation. Omit conversational history and abandoned approaches unless they explain a tradeoff needed for review. Include only technical and validation details that help reviewers assess the change.
"""
gg
GPT-Live-1 is now available in the API.
Bring ChatGPT’s natural back-and-forth to your app, with voice agents that listen while they speak and work with the models and harness you choose.
Introducing VEED Multi-Shot Characters.
Create viral AI videos with multiple camera angles.
• Save hours of time
• Keep retention higher
• Get 10X more realistic results
💥 FREE 500 AI credits in DM for first 200 users who:
– Retweet
– Comment “VIRAL"
– Must be following
I’ve officially graduated from JDD to AI Gaslighting.
The ultimate power move is telling Model A that Model B wrote a much cleaner, faster function just to make Model A insecure enough to optimize its code.
I am literally manufacturing sibling rivalry between neural networks. 😭
6.2M tokens. $0.17.
This is GLM 5.2, one of the best coding models available today.
At InferX, we’re focused on making state-of-the-art models accessible without breaking the bank.
Try it: https://t.co/7AjkqIri44
We're giving away 100,000,000,000 tokens to make startups agent-native.
Here's how:
1. Sign up at https://t.co/UVI35J0diC
2. We'll grant credits to great teams
3. Talk to Nebula and build your agents