The elimination of Deep State Iran is going to be a little painful in the U.S.A., especially with fuel prices spiking throughout March. This will keep the Demoncrats happy talking about affordability and may even loosen up on riots by keeping them occupied. After Iran regime change, the Deep State mistress will be back to Ukraine.
MAGA knows polling throughout March is going down on purpose to weed out the final RINOs in the primaries. Here’s the kicker: MAGA has clinched that gold and silver will rise—keeping all eyes on it, with people thinking it’s the end of the world—when in reality it’s prepping for May 16th, the day Kevin Warsh succeeds Powell.
Boom—the real Summer of Love Gold will begin, with the real value of gold starting its mark not only on the dollar, but on the petrodollar’s global strength, again upsetting BRIC nations’ gold gluttony and the global central banks’ accumulation of gold. Everything happening now and between May 16th will be nothing but a small hiccup—a memory—leading to a complete annihilation of the Demoncratic Party, especially after SCOTUS rules on the VRA, as the real Summer of Love Gold happens where all prices come down and inflation almost completely vanishes into thin air.
@RandPaul .... about fucking time.... but again you are too late and sniffing up the wrong leg. You see, Trump & Besset are bypassing the Fed completely with the new Trump economy. Once bypassed, Then you can audit the fuck out of it!!!!
@RandPaul@FoxNews You suck donkey dicks, dumb fuck, they are dividend checks. Do one thing before you're voted out of office in 2028, ABOLISH THE FUCKING FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913 YOU DUMB-FUCK!!!!!! MAGA will be getting rid of you, the dumocrats can have the scraps.
@TrumpDailyPosts I put this chart on my @Nextdoor thread discussing media bias, and @Nextdoor censored me, flagged it cruel and bullying. But yet @Nextdoor allowed the Trump supporters heads up their asses. Fuck all of @Nextdoor for censorship against MAGA supporters. Thank God for 'X'.
What gets me is the incredible amount of confidence Thomas Crooks appeared to have. He knowingly walked around with a backpack, took measurements, surveyed the area, and had to know that law enforcement and the Secret Service were present and potentially watching people around the rally. Yet he didn't seem to flinch.
That's the part I can't get past. His behavior almost gives the impression that someone had told him, "Do this. You'll be fine. We've got your back. Nothing is going to happen to you."
I don't care that he was only 20 years old. It is difficult for me to understand how someone contemplating the assassination of a former president and presidential candidate could display that level of confidence without believing, for some reason, that he could get away with what he was doing.
Look at the behavior of other assassins or would-be assassins. They generally try to conceal themselves and avoid detection. Lee Harvey Oswald, regardless of the continuing arguments over exactly what happened in the Kennedy assassination, was alleged to have fired from a concealed position on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. The whole point was concealment.
Crooks' behavior strikes me very differently. He was moving around, observing the area, carrying equipment, taking measurements, and apparently continuing despite knowing that security personnel were nearby. He wasn't behaving like someone terrified that the slightest wrong move would expose what he was allegedly planning.
That is what bothers me most. It was the confidence.
To me, that level of confidence raises a serious question about whether Crooks believed he was acting completely on his own or whether something—or someone—had given him reason to believe that he would be able to proceed without being stopped.
That doesn't prove that another person was involved. But I don't think his unusually confident behavior should simply be dismissed. It is one of the aspects of the assassination attempt that deserves a clear and convincing explanation.
What gets me is the incredible amount of confidence Thomas Crooks appeared to have. He knowingly walked around with a backpack, took measurements, surveyed the area, and had to know that law enforcement and the Secret Service were present and potentially watching people around the rally. Yet he didn't seem to flinch.
That's the part I can't get past. His behavior almost gives the impression that someone had told him, "Do this. You'll be fine. We've got your back. Nothing is going to happen to you."
I don't care that he was only 20 years old. It is difficult for me to understand how someone contemplating the assassination of a former president and presidential candidate could display that level of confidence without believing, for some reason, that he could get away with what he was doing.
Look at the behavior of other assassins or would-be assassins. They generally try to conceal themselves and avoid detection. Lee Harvey Oswald, regardless of the continuing arguments over exactly what happened in the Kennedy assassination, was alleged to have fired from a concealed position on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. The whole point was concealment.
Crooks' behavior strikes me very differently. He was moving around, observing the area, carrying equipment, taking measurements, and apparently continuing despite knowing that security personnel were nearby. He wasn't behaving like someone terrified that the slightest wrong move would expose what he was allegedly planning.
That is what bothers me most. It was the confidence.
To me, that level of confidence raises a serious question about whether Crooks believed he was acting completely on his own or whether something—or someone—had given him reason to believe that he would be able to proceed without being stopped.
That doesn't prove that another person was involved. But I don't think his unusually confident behavior should simply be dismissed. It is one of the aspects of the assassination attempt that deserves a clear and convincing explanation.
MAGA voted for Trump to make everything about himself. He called the House recess, plain and simple, the House will reconvene, the dumocrats will be powerless for 100 years or more because dumocrats aren't reproducing children, just aborting them, so yes, it's all about Trump!!!>>>> Shit for brains
Wow, the haters really drank the Haterade when you guys left on recess. True MAGA knows why you guys were put on recess, and why the Senate isn't excited about anything. Oh well, make the haters make sense when the haters try to speak! We can't tell what hurts when they just drool!
I bet you trusted the science too when the Scamdemic was released. Regardless of the math, Trump and MAGA decided why give the dumocrats a mouthpiece to something that wouldn't pass in the first place, dumocrat control of AI regulations. Shut them the fuck up by putting them into recess until the election is over. The dumocrats have no funds, they have no leader, they have no way of cheating, so fucking up Congress is all they had left. And that is your details to your math that everyone already knows.
So what was Gassy Massie using for the grounds to impeach Hegseth? If you say the Iran war, than you're dumber than you look. The only thing the House can do is Defund the war, and that would have taken Trump's signature, which he would have never signed. So the Gassy Massie impeachment hoax was just that, another hoax.