@howardanglin@scoopercooper Regularly. Usually when a decision is struck on review and sent for reconsideration it’s because the decision maker failed to adequately articulate their decision in writing and show they considered everything they legally must. Usually they stand on redicision w/ better writing.
@PaulSillanpaa@esjesjesj Plus the English prescribed execution for a very wide range of offences, many relatively minor. Many of those sentences were commuted in various ways (see: Australia). There weren’t 0.5-1% of English men committing murder. You can tell when people haven’t actually studied stuff.
@MikeTheNavyGuy1 Yeah, I’m not seeing there being a need to add criminal laws. In the more extreme cases there could be benefit to making it easier to use and protect national security intelligence to advance criminal investigations where that overlap does exist, but that’s pretty niche.
@wbridgefa@atila3958@Osinttechnical Stop a ship like catastrophically kill it? Likely not. Wreck its combat systems and everything that makes it militarily useful for the next while? Yup, good chance. Bad night for the crew, too. Not sure how close you’ve been to large explosions, but 200lbs isn’t nothing.
@ArfinNathaniel And there’s a distinct difference between “oh crap this is a sudden emergency we did not foresee and which exceeds civilian resources and capabilities!” and “we know in advance that we’ll need to maintain this specific patch of highway every year for eternity”.
@MikeTheNavyGuy1@MoeCoast Practically anyone invested in any Canadian equity funds is invested in Brookfield. And any pension fund as well as the CPP fund *definitely* is.
@Gray_Mackenzie An interesting counter could be to proportionately tariff or prohibit any U.S. origin goods that are manufactured in whole or part using prison labour. And be really, really public about that.