cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍

cryptomining
$eGLD
$mex $utk $Sui $Fet $Hbar

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@helloluis @binance @SEC_Philippines the crocs 🐊 🐊🐊 as a binance partner lol

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@Gabriele_Corno

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@TrumpsHurricane

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@harukaawake

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@Unveiled_ChinaX ohh the. clown president 🤡

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@Polymarket 🤡 president

[Chainspect @chainspect_app]

We put @MultiversX on our new chart to see how big the gap is

Next-gen applications demand Internet-scale speed, and MultiversX transactions settle exactly that fast

📈 https://t.co/eZ9oNAydI5

[Rob Schneider 🇺🇸 @RobSchneider]

PIG PHARMA

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@BethanyForTruth i saw that script once not gonna happen again 😎

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@zundamotisuki

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@shinobu_books deport those 🤡🤡

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

and it's happening

[Jake Lang - January 6 Political Prisoner 🇺🇸 @JakeLang]

🚨 BREAKING:

Muslims in Plano Texas are LITERALLY bragging about “ISLAMIC TAKEOVER” 😡😡

I asked these 3 young military aged

“Why aren’t you dressed like Americans? You are wearing dresses like women!”

Texas ‘ SHARIA LAW’ Police protecting the Mosque had to pull the men away!

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Larry Ellison just asked the one question no journalist on Earth can answer.

A Wall Street Journal writer told Ellison to his face that Elon Musk doesn’t know what he’s doing.

Ellison didn’t argue. Didn’t get emotional. He just asked a question.

Ellison: “This guy is landing rockets on robot drone rafts in the ocean, and you’re saying he doesn’t know what he’s doing. You ever land a rocket?”

One question. No recovery.

Ellison: “Who are you? Why should I believe you as opposed to my friend Elon?”

This is the question the entire media class has been dodging for a decade. Who are you to judge? What have you built? What have you shipped? What problem have you solved that didn’t involve a keyboard and a deadline?

Ellison: “You’re there in front of your Apple Macintosh typing up an article saying Elon’s an idiot.”

They sit behind a laptop they did not engineer. Using a network they did not build. Running on silicon they cannot explain. To tell the world that the man sending humans to space doesn’t know what he’s doing.

They have never built anything heavier than a Word document.

And they publish it with absolute certainty.

That’s the part that should disturb you. Not the criticism. The confidence behind it. The total absence of self-awareness it takes to judge disciplines you wouldn’t last a single semester in.

Musk does not operate in opinion. He operates in the physical layer of the universe where the math closes or the rocket does not come home.

His critics operate in a text editor.

He built the vehicle that carries NASA astronauts to the International Space Station. The satellite constellation delivering internet to active war zones. The EV that forced every automaker on Earth to abandon their combustion roadmap.

His loudest critics built a byline.

So why the coordinated hatred?

Because they lost the leash.

The attacks didn’t escalate because Musk got worse at engineering. They escalated because he bought X. He cracked open the algorithm. He handed the public square back to the people. And he shattered their ability to control what you’re allowed to think.

They don’t hate the engineer.

They hate that the engineer took their monopoly.

You cannot cancel a rocket. You cannot publish a hit piece on gravity. You cannot edit the laws of physics.

They own the syntax.

He owns the physics.

One of them is going to Mars.

[Robert Sasu | dev/acc @SasuRobert]

1Billion transactions on Battle Of Nodes.

3200 validators. Avg 200ms finality. 120K TPS, all in low spec consumer grade hardware.

[Lucian Mincu @lucianmincu]

two weeks ago I wrote: "finality faster than the block slot. 120K TPS. same hardware."

today: 1 billion transactions processed on Battle Net. 120K TPS confirmed live.

still think nobody's building? RT this and tag someone who needs to see it.

[Danny Serb @serb_daniel]

Stripe integration: DONE ✅

[Robert Sasu | dev/acc @SasuRobert]

SuperNova is finally here.

Yes, we can say that it is the most advanced, most scalable, probably the cheapest blockchain infrastructure which can execute this amount of transactions, cheapest for validators, for developers, for users.

And it can scale to whatever number it is required. That is the power of sharding.

And now it can be enjoyed with sub second one shot finality. How cool is that?

[Adrian Tiberiu @AdrianLoghinT]

Supernova on #MultiversX is seriously impressive even if you're not deep into the tech side 🤯

During the public testing phase, finality is already dropping below 100ms. That’s insane.

And remember, it’s officially marketed at ~600ms finality, which alone is enough to shake up the blockchain landscape.

Huge respect to everyone who spent the last ~2 years building this upgrade. Massive work 👏

[cryptocoins°× ⚡🦍 @bugmarkcrypto]

@Rainmaker1973 nostalgia haha my fav screensaver that time 🥰

[Defi Rocketeer @Defi_Rocketeer]

Full-Stack AI Economies: Comparing NEAR, MultiversX, Virtuals and ASI

If AI agents are a trillion-dollar economy by 2030, then whoever owns compute + payments + coordination today is massively underpriced.

I’ve been mapping the Full-stack AI economy thesis this month, after that I think most people still misunderstand the game.

AI-native blockchains are evolving from single-purpose platforms into complete economic systems, stacking compute, payments, agent marketplaces, and coordination layers to enable autonomous agent activity.

So I put them in my framework, a real AI economy needs 4 layers:

[1] Compute sovereignty - where agents actually run.

[2] Native payments - how agents pay each other.

[3] Marketplace liquidity - where agents monetize.

[4] Coordination layer - how everything scales without friction.

Among the leaders, @NEARProtocol and @ASI_Alliance offer the most mature full stacks, with dedicated decentralized compute and agent runtimes tailored for agentic workflows.

@virtuals_io dominates agent tokenization and marketplaces but leans on external compute, while @MultiversX excels in agentic commerce standards via Google's Universal Commerce Protocol integrations.

Here’s I’ll share the details insights on each protocol, I also rank them consecutively:

1/ $NEAR – The Most Complete Stack

I’ll say it directly, I think NEAR is currently the most complete AI economy stack.

→ Compute - They launched confidential GPU infra + AI runtime. TEE-secured workloads, enterprise narrative, sub-30s attestations. That matters because agent economies without secure compute are just token casinos.

→ Payments - NEAR Intents + x402 integration. Cross-chain execution + revenue-sharing + fee switch with buybacks already live.

→ Agents Layer - ironClaw runtime + chain abstraction across 35+ chains. This is execution infra, not just marketplace UI.

→ Coordination - Nightshade + chain abstraction = scalable coordination. If agent traffic explodes, infra won’t choke.

Market cap ~$1.6B with strongest volume profile among the 4. I believe $NEAR looks like it wants to be AWS + Stripe + Shopify for AI agents.

2/ $ASI Alliance - The AGI Maximalist Bet

When ASI Alliance merged @Fetch_ai , @SingularityNET, and @oceanprotocol , I was skeptical, but strategically It makes sense.

They combine agents, model marketplace, data marketplace, decentralized compute.

ICYMI, this is an AGI infra bet.

Mcap is ~$347M → much smaller than $NEAR and liquidity is thinner.

However what stands out to me is conceptual alignment: data + models + compute + tokenized coordination.

If AI agents require composable intelligence markets, $ASI could become the clearinghouse.

The upside is ideological dominance if AI-native infra wins, eventually i think this is the long-volatility bet.

3/ $VIRTUAL - The Agent Tokenization King

Virtuals Protocol does financializes agents extremely well.

- ~$488M mcap.

- $100M trading volume relative to cap daily.

- Thousands of tokenized agents.

- aGDP framework tracking agent output.

From my perspective as someone who watches liquidity closely, Virtuals understands speculation is fuel deeply.

That’s why they turned agents into tradable, ownable assets with measurable economic identity.

If compute becomes vertically integrated by chains like NEAR or ASI, margins compress for marketplace-only models.

I see it as the Nasdaq for AI agents still very valuable.

4/ $EGLD - The Commerce Standards Play

MultiversX is underrated in this conversation, they focus on agentic commerce standards.

UCP, ACP, AP2, MCP → all commerce-native stack with gasless transactions and HTTP-native integration.

They push AI-native commerce rails even though the volume is lowest among the 4 so does the mcap ~$124M.

But if AI agents start doing real commerce such as subscriptions, APIs, autonomous purchasing, standards matter more than hype.

MultiversX feels like it’s building ISO standards for AI commerce while others fight over infra dominance.

My takeaways:

after surviving multiple cycles from GameFi, NFTs, airdrops, modular, restaking… I’ve learned that narratives are shortterm but economic architecture is longterm.

i think these 4 are building sovereign economic systems for autonomous agents.

that matters more than chasing hyped or flipping shortterm gains, market has matured so much that ppl realize they now want to invest in infra like this.