@MikeToutonghi@VerusCoin I'm not Coinbase but I believe I make an interesting native wallet with some unique experimental features including threaded messaging over z-tx that might bring some value to Verus. Currently works with pirated.
@DocumentingZEC@Snowden Hey ZEC, you can check if my project is interesting for you. Not going to participate in your KYC/AML antiprivacy project funding. I believe to have most advanced z-tx messaging protocol implemented and working (threaded forum and dm's too, all in-wallet). Different chain though.
Optimizing view keys import/export to pass start block (init tx) to import faster. This is great for fresh keys sharing - will load them much faster (sync from the first tx instead of genesis block).
@AsyncLuck@TonyMcDow@zamosk88@DocumentingBTC@saylor@Falkvinge@VerusCoin % fee profit is good for big players (banks = centralization). Too small incentive for < N BTC owners. Not sure about N but my guess more then 100 depending on $ price and LN usage. In any case there is scalability solution on L0/L1, hence LN is complicated and obsolete hype.
@TonyMcDow@zamosk88@DocumentingBTC@saylor@Falkvinge@VerusCoin Regarding decentralization - if you gain something you loose something. E.g. POS gives better speed then POW but worse decentralization (and overall system evolves towards centralization and monopolies). LN won't be POW, so it will be more like POS I believe.
@TonyMcDow@zamosk88@DocumentingBTC@saylor I trust @Falkvinge analysis. It's off chain, requires decent node balance. There will be kind of evolution of such system and likely big players prevail to earn fees. Not necessary at all since scalability solutions exist (see @VerusCoin )
@zamosk88@DocumentingBTC@saylor The lightning nickname = the banking network๐ Loosing decentralization to get back to a banking system to make rich greater again.
@zawy3 Civ did increase initially - scaling production and trade worldwide = more opportunities, growth, population growth followed. After hundred year of growth maybe time for decrease?
@Snowden History is the context. In the past people lived together with grandparents close, who often took care of kids. Also people often worked close to home, on the field or in the workshop next to home. Today is different - families separated all over the world "for better life".
@btcfork@Falkvinge Can't see anything exciting about BCH. Neither biggest hash, nor anonymity, just the disputed "legacy" which is simply boring. A chain which borrows BTC hash and joins it with forced anon from ZEC is more exciting. Come and see. https://t.co/xbtOBIfrhv ๐
@TimoSci @adam3us@abbuuniverse BTC got the best POW hash rate (security) + decentralization. However there are chains using BTC hash rate via notarization, so the security from BTC is employed for some chains. Obviously though BTC is missing core anon and some other features. AB is just shilling his beliefs.
@elonmusk If you care for fundamentals I build in-wallet forum over anonymous blockchain (anon chain using zksnarks/ZEC-like). Not as scalable, but decentralized anon talk is possible.
@elonmusk If you care for fundamentals I build in-wallet forum over anonymous blockchain (anon chain using zksnarks/ZEC-like). Not as scalable, but decentralized anon talk is possible.
@_aristarchus_ From ZEC family I believe PirateChain has the highest anon set (being forced p2p anon tx). Before you name it a s-coin know it has double spend protection using BTC network hash. I'm building decentralized forum over PirateChain.
@LynAldenContact@INArteCarloDoss In my app you can send txt msg over private chain and even create private or public channel. Would't call it internet but certainly viable decentralized option for unstoppable speech freedom. The chain is double spend protected using BTC notarization and privacy is ZEC based.
@IamNomad Updated my app: Decentralized forum over private blockchain is there. Create a private room or a public anon channel. All is #onchain, #inwallet, #z_tx based. How cool is that?๐