Doing your own research is the most powerful Edge in Crypto.
But most people suck at research.
Here are my Crypto research frameworks to make it easy:
(so you don't have to rely on influencers)
Front-running all of your bad nomad takes:
1. “This is why trustless bridges are better”
The trust model wasn’t compromised.
2. “This is why multi chain = bad.”
There was nothing bridge-specific about the exploit.
3. “Nomad team = bad”
Smart, good people make mistakes.
take note of people who stir shit about ethereum splitting. they are discounting tens of thousands of hours of engineering work which went into ensuring the safest upgrade possible. an i’m not even talking of an unprecedented level cross-client coordination.
There are simply too many high quality accounts to ever really nail down a top 100.
Will probably publish a top 100 soon anyways, then continue adding only the finest of accounts.
Too many legends not on the list right now, and there's not much fat to trim.
Getting close to the first iteration of CT's top 100
Doesn't mean much, there are certainly several who are undeserving and several who are missing
Will update as accounts are added and removed
Will not follow more than 100 accounts
Once I get to 100, I'll unfollow 1 for every new person I follow
Coindesk updates and clueless 'traders' and shitposters will not last long
Please submit any nominees you may have, especially smaller accounts that may be harder to find.
Options vault protocols advertising “sustainable yield” is misleading af, don’t understand how they get away with it. Solid use case but labeling directional risk as APY is irresponsible and borderline predatory.