Lemme get uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh decent bio
@EricTopol@SandelloRed@NatureMedicine Do you think putting “frontier” in the title makes them frontier? It takes ten seconds to google “Claude current version”
@thebadstats “Perhaps it’s because I spent 10 years studying the laws of narrative, and many of these lessons are relevant”
Maybe needs to review some of that material lol
@izem000 Calisthenics people a huge inferiority complex, they can’t go 1 min without whining about weight lifting. They need to do some more sets of shutting the fuck up
@SchulzkeKurt@AldonSnow48246@washingtonpost@grok Nature has more retractions because it attracts more eyes. There are probably other reasons, too, but that is a big one.
There’s a reason that Frontiers in Quantum Nutritional Fluid Dynamics has fewer retractions, and it’s not because the research quality is better.
@SchulzkeKurt@AldonSnow48246@washingtonpost@grok “Ranked by citation counts”
Do you think Nature receives more or less citations than average? Could this confound the point you are trying to make?
Might wanna go review those stats notes from your degree, friend.
@SchulzkeKurt@AldonSnow48246@washingtonpost@grok You have no idea what you’re talking about 🤣
It’s one of the most desirable journals to publish in, if not the most.
go ahead and log off buddy
@gordonsin@EricLDaugh Did you think about this before posting? Right to a trial, right to be protected from crimes, right to vote, etc all require the labor of others
@RNGebhardt@olsonplanner Where did you get the idea that med students don’t touch patients until residency? Even most premeds interact with patients.
More importantly, the clinical hour requirement for NPs (500 hrs) is often completed by med students in just 1-3 rotations. They’re the same at all.
@Serena_Partrick@JMSanchis70@geeklyamanda@zaelefty Article redefines sex as people who make big (females) and small (male) reproductive cells. The problem with this definition (just like using karyotype) is there are still DSDs that refute it, like ovotesticular DSD, where people have the gonads of both sexes.