I've been building a plugin for writing novels in Obsidian inspired by Scrivener's workflow as a fun side project.
Binders lets a folder keep the order you give it, then shows the same notes as a corkboard, an outliner, one editable manuscript, or a timeline. Snapshots and export included. All plain Markdown!
https://t.co/plg0tLEBR3
I've been building a plugin for writing novels in Obsidian inspired by Scrivener's workflow as a fun side project.
Binders lets a folder keep the order you give it, then shows the same notes as a corkboard, an outliner, one editable manuscript, or a timeline. Snapshots and export included. All plain Markdown!
https://t.co/plg0tLEBR3
Charlie Kirk suspected immediately that October 7 was an Israeli false flag. Our leaders ignored him, which is why our empire is now being destroyed by Netanyahu-led wars. Dave Smith on this generation’s 9-11.
"J.D. Vance is the successor to Donald Trump.
We support J.D. Vance.
MAGA supports J.D. Vance.
J.D. Vance is not an anti-Semite.
If you want to help strengthen this relationship, the sooner you get on the Vance train, the better."
— @WilliamWolfe at NatCon Jerusalem.
@MichaelFKane@EidolonOracle This is a very common pathogen in writers. Where they enjoy writing the big moments of a story or idea rather than spending quality time consistently writing the tissue in between these moments.
I think it's instructive that the government that chose "the unapologetic pursuit of national power" is presiding over the most obvious collapse of American political power abroad since the 1920s.
@Nikos_17 Actually, the fact that he can give a speech and so successfully handle involvement with the Trump administration is a demonstration of his competence as a coalitional figure.
How have we arrived at the perception the US cannot win wars against even small or regional powers?
It's because in the last fifty years, very few presidents have outlined realistic terms (or even any terms at all) for what victory looks like.
@Malinowski The pursuit of national power is not inherently bad, depending on what your nation stands for. The pursuit of American national power is a good thing, and the pursuit of Chinese national power is a bad thing. The values on which our two nations are built diverge greatly.
Imagine applying this strain of thought to virtually any other technological revolution in human history:
"Nobody voted for these evil tycoons to build railroads and destroy thousands of valuable wagon driver jobs!"
Weird tech guys are busy building technology that will likely put millions of people out of work and upend our lives in unprecedented ways — a change that nobody voted for, and few of us want or will benefit from — and somehow so many people on the Right have chosen the “this is fine, let’s allow the tech guys who hate us to do whatever the hell they want and transform society in whatever way they prefer while they become trillionaires and everyone else loses everything” side of the debate. Perhaps the most extraordinarily stupid political miscalculation of all time. We’re supposed to be the ones who actually value human life and the human experience.
Imagine going to Athens of all places, the cradle of democracy and the rule of law, to make a speech that revels in unadulterated fascism and glorification of the strong man. Chilling stuff.
Do indeed listen to understand what the rest of the West is up against
@MichaelFKane@TheDDDPod It's not Tolkien because Tolkien is Tolkien, very few works ever rise to his level. It's not Lewis, because Lewis' story contains a depth of spirituality that Harry Potter simply never possesses. But at its core, Harry Potter is a beautiful fairy tale about the power of love.
@JN4Liberty I'm kind of shocked though, that they'd literally make a movie about why big tech billionaires should be deciding what is true or not for us.