Nothing should surprise me after being on here for so many years and I know FinX doesn’t care for anything other than making a buck but it really shouldn’t be that controversial to hold CEOs to a higher standard. Just my 2c
@mets1992 Nothings changed here really, they sold the racinos at a multiple better than I expected
Mostly just illiquidity hammering the stock
I’ve been adding
Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania, doesn’t look like what most people picture when they think of Pennsylvania.
Narrow streets, old buildings, steep hills and forest all around it.
It feels more like a little mountain town somewhere in Europe.
$SEG has interested me a lot and its de risked a lot in the last year, but its really if we’re being honest a real estate discount to NAV story with negative FCF and EBITDA and difficult assumptions on when it turns positive maybe late 2027 or even 2028?
2. Rising rates hurt them until they pay down the term loan due to their term loan being floating rate choice of SOFR or ABR, cash is going to be tight until the term loan is paid down
Say what you want about Bill Pulte but targeting monopolies i.e. $FICO that have taken advantage of consumers last few years is exactly what you want a regulator to do, no?
One area I tend to think deserve higher multiples are the can companies, $CCK $AMBP $BALL your pick. In an era where AI disruption is going to disrupt most businesses to some degree…… tough to disrupt a can