Charles Kerchner

Constitutional Conservative

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@BillHemmer No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within the context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@BillOReilly No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within the context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@JesseKellyDC No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within the context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@DLoesch @DanaPerino No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@RobCarson No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within the context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@marc_lotter

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@SharlaMcBride No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within the context of 14th Amendment as defined by its author

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@edhenry @CarlHigbie No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment & pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its author

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@RobFinnertyUSA No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@greta @SchmittNYC No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its author

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@RepMackenzie No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within the context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@johnrobertsFox No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@FoxFriendsFirst No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@ainsleyearhardt No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@RealSheriffJoe No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@LawrenceBJones3 No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@JeffLandry No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within the context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@SteveDoocy @kilmeade No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@WarRoomPandemic No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors

[Charles Kerchner @cdrkerchner]

@HomanNews No constitutional amendment needed. The easier quicker way is for Congress to use Section 5 (read it) of 14th Amendment and pass a law defining what the clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means within the context of 14th Amendment as defined by its authors