No, and I agree with what you’re saying, but let’s not forget that a major point of $STRC is to increase btc/share.
I’m fine with selling $MSTR below 1 mNAV, because it usually means stack growth to expand and facilitate $STRC sales.
I will add: we should have smashed the ATM way more when mNAV was above 1.5-2.0
No, and I agree with what you’re saying, but let’s not forget that a major point of $STRC is to increase btc/share.
I’m fine with selling $MSTR below 1 mNAV, because it usually means stack growth to expand and facilitate $STRC sales.
I will add: we should have smashed the ATM way more when mNAV was above 1.5-2.0
@BitStrategy21@StrategyMaxi But we want btc per share to increase YoY; and from what I see, saylor wants the same thing. Is there something I’m not getting?
@AdamBLiv I don’t understand what is happening to him. He was crucial in my bitcoin journey. A sad thing to see, he’s almost taking the $MSTR stuff personally
@SimonDixonTwitt We’re not a price manipulation engine, we’re a bitcoin accumulation engine. I’m not sure who is believing your theory that 32 BTC moves the market
@SimonDixonTwitt Garbage post, absolute garbage.
You have good takes sometimes but a lot of times you think you know everything and so you try to fit each event into your own narrative without even double checking.
He’s forced to sell these for tax purposes.
@araghchi “Had Lebanon been bargaining chip for Iran, we'd have a deal long ago.”
This is a contradictory statement, you’re saying that you would have a deal long ago if it were not for us, which literally means we are a bargaining chip.