@BrennanBaxt@dfwticket Pure hyperbole. You have no way of knowing this. Also google how Iowa State handled their QB who gambled. What a moronic statement.
@BrennanBaxt Requesting to reinstate a player who bet on his football team (including against his team) 40 times is objectively bad. He broke a cardinal rule and crossed a line that shall not be crossed.
@TechAthletics You know you are in the wrong when you need to post a 22 minute video trying to defend yourself. He broke a cardinal rule. End of story.
@SamSung80085@DanWetzel@espn The NCAA tries to do their job by correctly ruling him ineligible. Unfortunately, they got an insane judicial ruling that will get appealed. This saga is not over and Tech is busy burning bridges.
@SamSung80085@DanWetzel@espn Like you, I donβt want these issues to continue. This involves, at a minimum, 1.) allowing the NCAA Enforcement to do their job and 2.) member schools doing the right thing and taking on players that bet on their own team 40 times.
@GamblinGauchos I have an issue with Texas Tech filing an appeal when he was ruled ineligible. They could have said he crossed a bright line and cut him loose right there, but they chose to fight it.
@JacobHarrisSBI This is a false choice. He could have a support system whether or not he ever steps on the football field again. This line of thinking is not hard to comprehend.
@TechAthletics@TexasTechFB Texas Tech is part of the problem. They could have cut him loose when they found out his crossed a bright line. But they didnβt and here we are.
@GrageDustin We all know Kirk is a scumbag. He only represents himself not a broader group of people. βThese people want us deadβ is disingenuous and divisive.