AI can now make you a great parent.
Introducing Ollie: the world’s first AI family assistant that manages your family life better than any human.
Here’s how it works:
@hnshah@SamAsante Congrats! This is going to be a hit.
AI autocomplete was the first truly magical LLM experience for a lot of developers. Finally, anyone who writes can feel the same.
Just finished @shreyas’ workshop on product taste.
Everyone talks about “taste” now, but @shreyas breaks it down into something concrete and actionable.
Highly recommend it for product people.
Excited to share our most powerful new Claude Code feature: dynamic workflows!
Mention "workflow" in a prompt and Claude will dynamically create an orchestration plan that it strictly follows, allowing you to confidently trust that every stage happens in the right order even across 100s of agents.
I agree with your core warning: as AI becomes a near-constant companion, the bigger risk may be models shaping users without users really seeing the steering.
Anthropic is unusually explicit that Claude’s constitution shapes behavior, and OpenAI is now unusually explicit that sycophancy is a safety problem.
To me, that means the next frontier isn’t just better personality, it’s legible personality.
I’d love to see labs expose, in product, three things:
- what values are active
- what memory is being used
- why a recommendation was made.
Helpful systems shouldn’t feel neutral if they aren’t; they should feel inspectable. Curious whether you think “everyday model cards” will become a mainstream consumer feature.
I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.
I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).
It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.
The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.
We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.
I worry.