@ryanrz@WilliamAEden I mean… could be?: https://t.co/lTdJaBtkmP
If you feel someone’s been professionally gaslighting and you then saw that, might be more inclined to believe the allegations without wanting to lead with it as factoring into your decision.
When your methods for trying to get unfired strongly conform to showing why you probably deserved to be fired in the first place… kind of suggests you’re not in the right
I think Sam's demonstrated the kind of devastating political effectiveness that's reasonably concordant with a picture of him being interpersonally manipulative
@MPrinParr@LarryPanozzo@packyM Discovered scandal risk and balked at leading the charge in making headlines over it? (And/or went looking for a reason they could argue from the business side?) https://t.co/lTdJaBtkmP
#dailyvideo: "Psychology of a Hero: Amelia Mignonette Thermopolis Renaldi (Mia) from THE PRINCESS DIARIES"
How can you realize your talents and potential? How can you overcome your fears and insecurities? Brand new episode of @therapy_cinema just dropped! https://t.co/C6Gv0reRmd
Thrilled to share that our newly expanded #consumerpermissioned#data PaaS offering now provides access to employment, income, & other consumer data types for any business that will benefit from a trusted & streamlined source for consumer information. https://t.co/P1LkqNZK2q
“The net result of the consent-based approach provides better transparency, more accurate data and stronger privacy.” ICYMI, read CEO @elanamir's case for consumer-permissioned data in this recent @AmerBanker piece. #consumerpermission#verifications https://t.co/ukCzRmM1Vi
@MeasureOneInc unlocks the power of consumer-permissioned #academicdata. How? When using our platform, consumers safely share their selected academic data elements, w/businesses given access to data that is accurate, reliable & transparent to the consumer. https://t.co/oBduNjorEl
@ladyquixotic 1. Cruz is more hated than Cornyn, so I doubt it
2. He’d made an agreement this turn was Hagar’s is my understanding, so the primary itself would have been damaging
If he hadn’t jumped in Pete would have had a solid chance. It’s even more frustrating how many Sanders supporters don’t even get Pete was more aligned w/their goals than Biden is and can’t internalize their relative loss from fighting Pete so hard.
it has been 21 days since Mike Bloomberg's campaign wrote a memo urging all the other candidates to drop out because he was the only one who could consolidate support against an otherwise unstoppable Bernie Sanders
Was this... a surprise? Almost every person I know in real life who supports him as at least a college degree and at least one of them makes more than I do (and I do well).
I already assumed no one was gonna bother watching this on tv but now that there’s no studio audience I’m glad we’re at a point of two old men arguing alone in a dark room.
And the DNC just announced that there will be no audience at Sunday's CNN debate.
"At the request of both campaigns and out of an abundance of caution, there will be no live audience at the Arizona debate taking place on Sunday, March 15th," @XochitlHinojosa says.
@iamcoolwiththat @ChiChiBLanchett@mehdirhasan@jljacobson@MaxKennerly The fact Iowa’s caucus should maybe be abolished and the fact that this cycle those were still the rules in play are separate things. We SHOULD get rid of the electoral college, but we haven’t yet, and Hillary’s not the president just like Bernie didn’t fucking win Iowa.
I know what he probably means, but his actual words would suggest the hypothesis there are just a lot of undiagnosed cases so mild that non aggressive testing doesn’t add them to the denominator on mortality rate may have been proven 🤔
South Korea was able to cut the mortality rate by 80% (compared to China) through aggressive testing which led to early treatment and selective quarantining of infected and of vulnerable people.
We have to do this in the U.S. starting NOW.
https://t.co/RFznHjJij1
I wouldn’t say he has NO idea; the reason Pete wrote a paper on Bernie was his willingness to compromise back in the day. But it does feel like that’s diminished with time, maybe cuz he’s following a negotiation strategy that requires good faith and the GOP have none now.
This email made me upset. The party is "coming home" to @JoeBiden?
No. The party is choosing the better of two old politicians who are both well past their prime because the good choices were forced out by their obstinance.
If it’s Amy or Beto it’ll be a gut punch. I can make arguments for Pete, I can make arguments for Harris, I can make arguments for quite a few people not mentioned. I can’t make Good arguments for Amy or Beto over Pete or Harris.
So when Pete, Kamala, Amy or Beto don’t get VP, are we going to fight about it again? We gonna complain that our candidate was robbed or owed something? Or are we gonna trust that they made the right call to win based on data and maybe we don’t know what TF we are talking about.