卐🪴 शुभ लाभ 卐🪴
L
A
K
S
H
M
I
M
A
I
Y
A
L
A
K
S
H
M
I
M
A
I
Y
A
L
A
K
S
H
M
I
M
A
I
Y
A
L
A
K
S
H
M
I
M
A
I
Y
A
L
A
K
S
H
M
I
M
A
I
Y
A
L
A
K
S
H
M
I
M
A
I
Y
A
L
A
K
S
H
M
I
M
A
I
Y
A
L
A
K
S
H
M
I
M
A
I
Y
A
L
A
K
M
I @grok
SALUTATIONS TO MAHALAXMI
ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT BUILDS A BUSINESS IN 45 MINUTES - IT HUNTS CUSTOMERS ON ITS OWN AND BRINGS $70K IN THE FIRST MONTH
in month one the system pulls 140+ customers, in month two the profit number goes past $180K
root → offer → surface → hunt → clock → back into the root
the first 9 minutes you write 3 lines no model can write for you: who buys, what we sell, at what price.
get those wrong and the next 36 minutes automate the wrong business perfectly.
the offer is one page, not a deck: the pain, the objection, the price.
the page, the payment link and the replies get built by 4 files in parallel in 5 minutes.
the first chain listens where your buyer complains - thousands of signals scored cheaply, a handful get a real letter.
a personal letter to someone who was never buying is a paid guess.
the second chain publishes 5 variants a day - one post is a guess, five a day for a month is a distribution.
the third chain is the cheapest: every closed deal describes the next one, and tomorrow the hunt runs a narrower list.
in the morning you read 3 numbers: conversations, replies, paid - if the first grows and the third doesn't, the offer is the problem.
and the honest part: 45 minutes buys distribution attempts, not demand - the machine runs whether or not anyone wants it.
save this and paste it into Claude Code - an hour builds the machine, the market decides the number ↓
This is completely f*cking wild.
A Stanford AI researchers gave Claude Code a second brain with JEV. The result? 80+ billion data points processed every 14 minutes.
here's how it works:
Jev stands at the door. every row has to get past it first.
the easy ones it waves through on the spot. only the ones it can't call get sent upstairs to Claude.
the old way:
everything -> Claude -> big bill
the new way:
everything -> Jev -> the tricky few -> Claude
Jev also tells you how sure it is on every call. that number decides who goes upstairs. just don't pick it out of thin air. test it first.
the 20-minute setup:
1. take 200 real rows from your data
2. run them through Jev AND Claude
3. sort Jev's answers by how sure it was
4. find the point where Jev stops disagreeing with Claude. that's your cutoff
5. above it, Jev's answer is final. below it, the row goes to Claude
then do the math. on a public benchmark Jev cost $0.015 per 1,000 rows and Claude cost $0.80.
if Jev settles 80% of your rows:
$0.015 + (20% × $0.80) = $0.175 per 1,000 rows instead of $0.80
that's ~78% off, with Claude still handling every hard case.
3 rules that keep it working:
-> ask all your questions in one Jev call. topic, urgency and sentiment together, not three separate requests
-> once a week, send 50 of Jev's "confident" answers to Claude anyway. if they start disagreeing, raise the cutoff
-> never let Jev make the final call on anything you can't undo. refunds, bans, deletions go to Claude or a human
where this pays off right away:
-> support tickets: route by topic and urgency
-> leads: hot, warm or skip
-> comments: fine, spam or needs a look
-> spreadsheets: fix category labels across thousands of rows
Claude thinks. Jev picks. code ships.
THIS IS PURE F*CKING GOLD
Anthropic just dropped the ultimate autonomy loop for Claude Code
The idea: run /goal in auto mode, and let the new Haiku 5.5 judge every turn
True overnight autonomy with zero burn: Sonnet builds, Haiku evaluates at 340 tok/s, Opus signs off
You just launch Claude Code like this:
claude --model opus --dangerously-skip-permissions
here's the split:
→ Opus 5.5 locks the goal condition and plans the overall architecture
→ Sonnet 5.5 writes the fixes, refactors modules, and runs test suites
→ Haiku 5.5 evaluates completion after every turn as an independent Stop hook
→ you stop burning Opus context on dozens of intermediate iteration turns
Opus only shows up at three moments:
→ framing the goal condition before the loop starts
→ intervening if the loop hits the turn cap or an impossible verdict
→ signing off on the final git diff once the goal clears
Opus frames · Sonnet builds · Haiku judges
JEV engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which tool, path resolution, retry or abort) clear in milliseconds, and the big models only see the ones that split
the full tree
> Opus 5.5 runs the main session and defines the completion condition
> auto mode approves safe tool calls so turns run unattended
> Sonnet 5.5 patches code and runs test suites in an isolated copy
> Haiku 5.5 evaluates transcript evidence: Met · Not yet met · Impossible
> background check-in monitors idle tasks and backs off stuck loops
> Opus 5.5 reviews the achieved transcript and signs off on the diff
> JEV routes micro-forks in milliseconds
paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓
"Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree:
1. Run the main session on Opus 5.5 with auto mode enabled
2. Route the goal evaluator hook to the new Haiku 5.5 via ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_HAIKU_MODEL
3. Use Sonnet 5.5 for implementation and refactoring turns, keeping fixes isolated
4. Add one rule to CLAUDE.md: always bound autonomous /goal conditions with a verifiable end state and stop after 20 turns with no progress
5. Route fast deterministic forks through JEV
Show me every change as a diff first, no edits until I say go"
↳ https://t.co/h4BLpKWcQJ
save it, it'll come in handy
THE CURVE WENT VERTICAL
AFTER 34 HOURS GROK HAD $1,474 FROM A $50 START.
THE LAST 14 HOURS ADDED $3,349.
Nobody posts hour 8 of a bot run. It looks like this: $118. A few small wins, a few red fills, nothing to screenshot.
That is where most people turn the bot off.
Grok just kept scanning. 1,343 pairs, 8 with real liquidity. 2,973 pairs, only 1 worth a look. Every coin where the dev wallet held too much got skipped on the spot. A whale walked into one pool with 377 SOL. Grok logged it and ran its own checks anyway.
The losses were not small. Several fills closed between -$52 and -$64. Some wins were barely +$10.
But 71% of trades closed green, and every win went back into the balance. Same rules, bigger size each time.
Hour 21: $490. Hour 34: $1,474.
Then the stair steps on the curve got taller. Each jump was one trade sized off a balance that had already compounded for a day and a half.
Hour 48: $4,823.
92 wins. 38 losses. 3,420 tasks across six agents. 96x on fifty dollars, and it still only hit 48% of its $10K goal.
I’ve quit more strategies at hour 8 than I’ve finished. This one would have looked dead to me too.
The patience is the hard part. The bot doesn’t need any.
The full setup is below and free. Almost nobody makes it past the first screen. Save it so you do.