@rowbott1@kinsleysteph76 Darrell I’m going to mute this conversation now. You’ve given me quite the chuckle this evening mister. Take care in Hong Kong you big brit*sh boy awhhh
@rowbott1@kinsleysteph76 So I didn’t read an implication where there wasn’t one since you’ve kindly at last owned up that your “first phrasing was vaguer”. And when you were making personal attacks that your English is light years ahead, I might be pedantic but at least I’m not a patronising cunt
@rowbott1@kinsleysteph76 If you want to talk about the composition of populations no has asked you about go ahead. characterising the Falklands as a "also settled by the Welsh" as if it were a Welsh project is inaccurate + lacks the socio-cultural intent that defined Welsh migration to Patagonia. 2/2
@rowbott1@kinsleysteph76 No your post was historically inaccurate and I pointed that out, you have now pivoted to personal attacks because you aren’t getting your way. I’m arguing how you’ve stupidly defined “settled by Welsh”
1/2
@rowbott1@kinsleysteph76 But you did and you’ve just made the exact same mistake by insisting it was predominately Scots, a considerable contingent were Welsh, no. There’s a big difference between what you’re trying to say and the general state sponsored British settlement of the Falklands islands.
@rowbott1@kinsleysteph76 This is incorrect. Implying it was settled by Welsh as if it were a Welsh project is incorrect. It was never a Welsh project in the way Patagonia was to preserve the Welsh language and culture, free from the influence of the English language and British political dominance