@DianaJohnsonMP No. But they *are* suggesting that the sentence should be for the crime of which the jury found them guilty (criminal damage), not the crime they were neither charged with nor convicted of that the judge decided to add on *after* the verdict (terrorism).
@BenKentish No. But they *are* suggesting that the sentence should be for the crime of which the jury found them guilty (criminal damage), not the crime they were neither charged with nor convicted of that the judge decided to add on *after* the verdict (terrorism).
Supporting and enabling a genocide, as both Tory and Labour governments have done, is illegal under the Genocide Convention 1948 and also the relevant UK legislation
Sunak, Starmer & others should face justice at The Hague
@charismaew@aseisfree@antloewenstein Sure. What they were NOT found guilty of or charged with BUT were sentenced for was terrorism. That’s why people are concerned.
What worries me most is that by the time people realize the line has moved, they may already be standing on the wrong side of it, facing a charge they never imagined, a detention they never expected, and a system that insists it is only enforcing the law. https://t.co/TzPK9f94NF
Sentenced and imprisoned on grounds of “terrorism” that no jury ever convicted them of.
Meanwhile, the British government continues to aid and abet the greatest crime of our time.
A historic miscarriage of justice — and a truly dark day for civil liberties in this country.
Nobody wants a city on Mars. Nobody wants AI in every app. Nobody wants a robot butler. Nobody wants data centers everywhere. Nobody wants flying cars or humanoid robots. We want clean water, we want bees to survive, and we want a habitable planet.
Attaching "terrorist connections" to the Filton 4 was probably intended to make an example of them by lengthening their sentences.
The problem for the establishment is, now every Jury in Palestine-linked cases will be wondering if they're being told the full picture.
@BlackLabelAdvsr Real safe. Can we compare your homicide rate with anywhere in the “developed” world? Or your maternal mortality rate? Or you medical bankruptcies rate? Or your school killings—at home and abroad, from Columbine, Sandy Hook, Parkland and Uvalde to Minab? USA USA USA!
But the other three didn’t - and the one who did wasn’t convicted of intentionally doing so. The terrorism sentencing added on without telling the jury should be seen as an outrage for anyone interested in basic British liberty and fairness.
@StephenM More extrajudicial killing. I hope you and your cronies live long enough to face justice in the Hague and rot in jail for the rest of your miserable lives. You are an eternal stain on the West.
3 of the 4 people didn’t attack the police officer and all of the 4 were cleared of violent intent. So the only disgrace here is the lie you’re telling to justify a clear miscarriage of justice & the use of anti-terror laws to justify your government’s complicity in a genocide.
All pretence cast aside. A vicious attack on the Anti-Zionist movement by the British state acting for the Zionist regime in defence of genocide.
Shameful.
#FreeTheFilton4
@OliverMolander Especially that favorite sport, mass killing of schoolchildren at home and abroad. Europe take note, their AI is out to steal your intellectual property and scrape your data too.
@TomTugendhat No. He wants the law to be followed, not undermined by judges sentencing people for crimes *of which they have not been convicted by the jury* (in this case, terrorism). You are a lying, not to say libellous piece of shit, Tom.
@JamesCleverly None of which justifies sentencing them on terrorism offences for which they were never convicted and of which the judge neglected to inform the jurors before they deliberated, you mendacious little cunt.
American broadcasters keep cutting to celebrities in the crowds and the UK commentators just go silent every time.
WE. DO. NOT. CARE.
No-one wants your horrible commercial culture to destroy football. This tournament is bad enough.