Blicky

King Reza Pahlavi ✌🏻تا آخرین نفس 🇮🇷

[Blicky @coblicck]

از کف ایران میگم صدای مردم داخل اینه
«جمهوری اسلامی باااااید بره به هررر قیمتی ، به هر قیمتی »
پشت شاه باشید پیروزی نزدیکه ✌🏻🤍
#جاویدشاه
#KingRezaPahlavi‌ForIran

[diana bloom @diana_bloom_]

🔴 How can lobbyists spend more than two hours discussing the human rights situation in Iran and still save the regime? An analysis of the (Green) Heinrich Böll Foundation panel from 2016

First, a note about the participants:

- Hadi Ghaemi served on the board of NIAC (the regime's lobby group) for many years and later founded the NGO “Center for Human Rights in Iran.” As leaks of his communications with Trita Parsi from that time show, Ghaemi’s explicit goal was to establish an NGO that did not advocate for the overthrow of the regime. The fact that Ghaemi was a member of NIAC is being kept under wraps.
- Omid Nouripour (a Green Party politician) has had ties to NIAC-members for years. The linked post shows how he has helped stabilize the regime for many years.
- Ziba Mir-Hosseini is advocating for women’s rights and gender equality within Islam.
- The moderator and initiator of the panel is Ali Fathollah-Nejad (CMEG). He, too, has a long history of ties to NIAC members. His entire political work is based on preserving the regime through, for example, pro-JCPOA and anti-sanctions stances.

About the panel:

1. The entire panel does not even once question the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic itself. Everyone is engaged in an intellectual discussion about how to bring about small improvements within the regime. They all accept that it isn’t working, that execution rates are rising, and that change would take a long time. The idea of ending the regime to improve the human rights situation in Iran isn’t even a conceivable option in this panel.

2. In the introduction, Fathollah-Nejad claims that the era of regime change is over and that a new era is beginning. He also claims that the suffering of the Iranian people is only partly due to the regime and partly due to "imperial pressure".

3. Ghaemi founded a regime-affiliated NGO to present the regime’s narrative to the West under the guise of a human rights organization. According to Ghaemi, everyone in the civilian population supports the JCPOA and opposes military intervention by the U.S. and Israel. Of course, this did not reflect the actual will of the people in Iran. It was the selective narrative that the regime-affiliated NGO presented to the West to advance its own interests.

4. As for the opposition, the only person mentioned by the entire panel is Narges Mohammadi, who is the face of the regime’s reformist wing. She, too, does not represent the end of the Islamic Republic.

5. The panelists are all pro-JCPOA.

Nouripour claims that the money from the JCPOA is rightfully the regime's money and lists the positive things the regime is doing with it (boosting the economy, creating jobs). This “on the one hand, on the other hand” narrative is, first of all, untrue: the money did not benefit the people. And it downplays the downsides of the JCPOA: funding for terrorist proxies and more money for repression. Nouripour mentions it, but treats it as if it were on equal footing.

6. According to Ghaemi, 80% of the executions is “merely” due to drug-related cases. Even if that were true - which it certainly was not - it would not serve as a justification. According to Ghaemi, no pressure from within or without can put an end to the executions.

7. Mir-Hosseini claims that Ahmadinejad ultimately became a supporter of women's rights.

8. Fathollah-Nejad claims that there is a danger that “authoritarian stability” could emerge in Iran. They speak of the future in this context. This is meant to convey that the Islamic Republic had not yet been that at the time. Judging by the human rights crimes that took place under the regime up until 2016, this is a statement that whitewashes the regime.

9. The panelists are against sanctions.

10. Ghaemi, in particular, repeats the false narrative that there are reformists and hardliners within the regime. This illusion of an opposition within the system has prolonged the life of the Islamic Republic by decades.

As I listen to this panel, three things become clear to me:

- Every one of the panelists wants the Islamic Republic to survive, either because of their Muslim background or because they are part of the NIAC ecosystem.

- All four panelists are aware of the regime’s human rights abuses. But they justify and downplay them.

- And finally, this image comes to mind: The panelists strike me as people (in fireproof suits) in a burning house who - instead of leaving the house or calling the fire department - take two glasses and repeatedly pour a few drops of water from one glass into the other.

They claim that the fire is indeed hot, but that they are doing something about it and that the situation will surely change soon. Meanwhile, all the children in the house have already died in the fire.

[Ebi Zandi @ebzandi]

من واقعا کلم خرابه با دیدن این زنجیره ارتباطات کثافت

[TIGER @tanhayektiger]

اگر خونشورهایی چون @tparsi نبودن، جمهوری جنایتکار اسلامی هرگز ۴۷ ساله نمیشد!

[Hasan Ghezelbash 🇮🇷 @hasanghezelbash]

Mr. @JDVance and Mr. @marcorubio
Contrary to the claims of the left and what the Islamic Republic lobby (@tparsi ) instills in you, we Iranians did not revolutionize for the sake of our own stomachs. We are willing to endure any pressure and losses to expel the Islamist occupiers from our homeland and gain our freedom. The Islamic Republic is not reformable, and appeasement and bargaining with it would be stepping on the blood of thousands of young people who gave their lives for freedom and a life of honor. A free, stable, and powerful Iran will have its positive effects on the region and the world, just as the evil and terrorist regime of the Islamic Republic has proven over the past 47 years and during the recent war that it can endanger the security of the world. We are only fighting for our freedom and our obvious rights. We want to live in peace like other countries in the world.
#KingRezaPahlavi‌ForIran

[آیت‌الله اِستمنایی Ayatollah Estemnayi @estemnayi1]

🔴🔴🔥🚨

۵ تیر

از نون شب واجب تره!!

وظیفه هر ایرانی آزادی خواه و مبارز اینه که با اتحاد کامل و ریپوست و پست کردن توییت های ضد رژیم
مانع فعالیت جمهوری اسلامی در خارج از کشور
بشه

دست تون میفشارم

#KingRezaPahlavi‌ForIran
#IranRevolution2026‌
@marcorubio
@LauraLoomer

[Neo @Realneo101]

فکر نمی‌کنم به ۵۰هزار نفر هم برسیم. کجاییم؟ نت داخل هم وصل شده ولی نه داخلیا هستن نه خارجیا. یعنی همه رفتین استراحت؟ اشکال نداره ولی برگردین که هنوز هیچی تموم نشده.
#انقلاب_شیروخورشید

[Capt. Haddock | קפטן האדוק | کاپیتان هادوک @ArmyofBern]

ببین تا چه حد باید بی شرفت باشی که اصلا اینو فکر کنی

[Neil Stone @DrNeilStone]

Why are Iranian regime lobbyists flying on Air Force 2 with JD Vance?

[Vahid Bahman وحید بهمن @vahid__bahman]

میگه چرا بجای تریتا پارسی و سهراب احمری، شاهزاده رضا پهلوی و تیم‌شون طرف مشورت جی‌دی ونس نشدن

انگار که ونس یه بچه ۵ ساله هستش که تریتا و سهراب با دادن آبنبات چوبی گولش زدن تا به حرفشون گوش کنه

کرم از خود درخته، وگرنه فقط شاید اهالی موزامبیک ندونن که امثال پارسی و احمری عوامل ج.ا هستند.
#پاينده_ایران
#جاویدشاه

[T E H R A N 🌃 👑 @Azita002]

Dear President Trump, If you do not recognize HIH Reza Pahlavi as the representative of the Iranian people for a transitional period — especially in light of the latest major uprisings inside Iran — the result will be that the criminal reformist elements, through their main and powerful lobby called NIAC, will infiltrate your administration like a virus. This will seriously undermine the credibility of your decision-making in the eyes of the world. How is it possible that we, the Iranian people living under heavy restrictions and repression, know these infiltration networks, yet the leader of the free world does not?For example, figures like Trita Parsi (grandson of Navab Safavi, one of the key founders of the Islamic Republic) and Sohrab Ahmari are currently polluting your circle and cabinet with viewpoints that align with the desires of the terrorist IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps).Please do not allow this to happen, Mr. President. The Iranian people’s struggle for freedom deserves clear-eyed support, not infiltration by the regime’s sophisticated lobbying arms.Respectfully,
A concerned Iranian voice for real change.
@realDonaldTrump
@POTUS
@SecRubio
@PahlaviReza

[👑یعقوب لیث @YaghobLeis]

از توییت های دیانا حمایت کنید به شدت مهم و تاثیرگذاره 👇🏻

[diana bloom @diana_bloom_]

"So why is he telling everyone he and Trita Parsi are JD Vance’s top IRAN advisor?"

Looking at the deal, everything about it is like the JCPOA. It was NIAC inside the Obama administration that was responsible for the catastrophic JCPOA. It is NIAC in the White House again, pushing through an even worse deal. Trita Parsi is openly bragging about his direct line to the White House.

https://t.co/8JhrczAQDQ

[Sativa @Sativa888]

Why is that guy 👇🏼 advising the VP of the United States?

Ask yourselves ffs
@SenateGOP
@HouseGOP
@FoxNews
@WSJ

[𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎ @NiohBerg]

Why on Earth does Trita Parsi have communications with the Trump administration?

Are they insane?

[رایا راکفلر @Rayarasing]

Trita Parsi’s original name was Abdolfazl Mirlohi, and he is allegedly from the Mirlohi family—the same family as Navvab Safavi.

Navvab Safavi was the founder of Fada’iyan-e Islam, a group known for using political violence and assassinations to advance its ideological goals. He and members of the group were responsible for or linked to several assassinations and attempted killings targeting Iranian political and cultural figures.

Trita Parsi has terrorist blood!

[diana bloom @diana_bloom_]

Very important, please read 👇

[Ahmed Khalifa @_A_khalifa]

WE DO NOT TRUST ISLAMIC REPUBLIC!

[Neil Stone @DrNeilStone]

JD Vance is an Iranian regime lobbyists dream

He's prepared to swallow all their bullshit 100%

[Laura Loomer @LauraLoomer]

Oh…

What do we have here?

@SohrabAhmari defending Dugin as a beacon of truth and promoting Dugin’s interview with Tucker Carlson, which was filmed in Russia when Tucker flew to Russia to interview Putin.

Dugin was caught on camera a few months ago saying the Russians should give nuclear weapons to Iran to destroy the West and attack the United States. He has also said the US needs to be destroyed and works daily to amplify hatred of Trump and Jews.

Now, Sohrab is running around telling everyone he is advising JD Vance on Iran.

Sohrab was born in Iran, he’s married to a Chinese national, and is a “former communist” who regularly bashes Donald Trump. He has no commonality with any MAGA conservative, but he wants to help dictate US foreign policy.

Defending Putin advisor Dugin @AGDugin makes me believe Sohrab isn’t a “former” at all, but rather a hard core Duginist like his buddy Tucker Carlson who said everyone in the GOP is condemnable “except” JD Vance.

Why was Sohrab allowed on Air Force 2?

People like this have no business being near any White House official.

[🦩فلامینگو @flamingo_irani2]

اخراج تریتا پارسی از آمریکا و انحلال نایاک از هرچیزی واجب تره!
به هر شکلی در هر ایالتی هستید به صورت عملی در مورد تریتا پارسی سکوت نکنید....🇮🇷
@tparsi