@11fulbo@giulianosimeone Hay que ser un sorete envidioso para comentar esto. Vos no hiciste un carajo por Messi y en tu puta vida vas a compartir una cancha con él. Circulá.
@mattkratter@nutzcraw But Bitcoin is not a democracy (as you said).
I'm still trying to wrap my head around why the signalling was "mandatory" when, at the end, miners also had to make a choice: to signal (or not). Couldn't 8/8 be understood as a MRSF (if such thing exists)?
Thanks for all u do, Matt
@P_Polci@marcos_galperin "Mientras tanto espero q̶u̶e̶ p̶o̶r̶ e̶s̶t̶e̶ t̶e̶ c̶o̶m̶a̶s̶ u̶n̶ b̶u̶e̶n̶ g̶a̶r̶r̶ón̶ que llegue mi última comprita en C̶o̶r̶r̶e̶o̶C̶o̶m̶p̶r̶a̶s̶ MercadoLibre"
FTFY
@_Checkmatey_@hodlonaut What we will never know is how much up would Bitcoin be if the network would've temporarily adopted an anti-spam, Bitcoin-is-money stance.
@Beautyon_ Success could be the hardfork eventually gaining monetary relevance, maybe even regaining the status of being *the* Bitcoin. Not as a goal to be achieved by following some specific steps, but as a consequence of the other chain just effing it up somehow, triggering some exodus.
@EMBII4U@adam3us@bamskki Your jpegs might be beautiful, full of meaningful values. Spamming the Bitcoin blockchain doesn't make them more or less valuable. It just shows you are a low self-esteem brat that needs to "proves others wrong". You don't know the virtues of well-understood, sound money.
@adam3us@bitgeist@MayaPar25 Are you, Señor Hashcash, ever going to side with the anti-spam, Bitcoin-is-money faction and have some fun by scorning the s(c|p)ammers? Here at X it seems you always prefer being BFF with the spammers, never fighting them in the technical and social layers.
@mrdeliveryz@ColeTU Attackers will make (more likely 'have made') the assumption that already drained wallets holding small amounts of BTC (let's say: 0.01-0.1) might just be decoy wallets. So, they'll target the same weak seeds, now in an attempt to brute-force the passphrases for the big price.
@HodlDee@honesthodl I've used this Dice-to-Seed (https://t.co/4mwIF3bgj8) tool to generate both a 12w and a 24w seed, with '6666...' (99 times) as input, and checked both wallets using Sparrow and BS app, and none of these wallets show any past transactions. I might be missing something here.
@HodlDee@honesthodl That would mean the other person (original seed creator) also created the seed using the dice roll option by hitting 6 ninetynine times. Not unlikely but I'd still think it was a collision caused by buggy firmware and Ryan, in his confusion, was looking for an explanation.
@AdamSimecka If they are captured, they could have also been forced to update the canary before the 60-days due date. How could you tell they weren't forced if that would be the case?
@udiWertheimer@giacomozucco And you are an agent of what exactly in Bitcoin? I imagine you think highly of yourself in regards to your contributions to Bitcoin... or maybe u only care about Bitcoin because all the profit you made by storing your dogshit on it. U're one reason why we can't have nice things.
@BigBaddaBoosh@seedsticks_org By "correct" you mean that the words all belong to the BIP39 dictionary? Or that the set includes all the 2048 words?
At any rate, if a word included in the set doesn't belong to the BIP39 dictionary, you won't be able to input it on a wallet.