CODEF(x)

Machine Learning, Game Theory and Data Analytics for Motorsport

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

Had a lot of fun building this model

An ML-powered tool that can analyze and optimize racing lines, compare strategies across drivers, and deconstruct strategic decisions at race starts

Loads to do still but progress! Stay tuned!

#F1 #IndyCar #Motorsport

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@wearetherace Would love to learn what the chain of command is between a team like Ferrari, versus a team like Red Bull

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@FIAFormulaE @JaguarRacing 😮‍💨

[Chris Medland @ChrisMedlandF1]

F1 has informed Imola that it won't be required as a race venue at the end of this season. Plan remains to race in Qatar and Abu Dhabi, and if that needs to change then the season will end in Las Vegas #F1

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@elbosstroll16 😬

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

John Elkann should be trackside with Ferrari every race next year in 2027–not unlike Toto Wolff, not unlike Zak Brown.

Further, John’s leadership can be assessed by the board YoY

When trackside decisions are detached from the track—it distorts operational realities.

#F1

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@sydneytifoso 🫡

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@SmhHeist @techndly Okay! Fair enough—you are saying the solution is that Elkann should INCREASE the distance to the F1 team and not decrease it (like I’m suggesting)

It’s a fair point btw

Thanks for engaging! Appreciate all of the comments!

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@SmhHeist @techndly Yes—but he does not hold unanimous governance.

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@SmhHeist @techndly Here is a devil’s advocate position—The WEC team is succeeding under Elkann’s leadership which he can point to to suggest his effectiveness. Just not the F1 team.

Okay let me ask you this—what would you suggest? Given the existing structure

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@SmhHeist @techndly Yes—but he is not the only board member

And if his responsibilities shift more towards trackside outcomes; then that means his decisions are significantly more consequential to his own position

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@Unpaid1ntern Though, the counter to all of this is the performance of the WEC team

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@Unpaid1ntern I agree with you—I think his responsibilities (and therefore accountability) ought to be anchored to trackside performance.

Right now he can take material decisions about trackside operations without consequence to his own position

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@liv16_liv 😅

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@nonmolIaremai 😅

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@burntrubber012 🫡

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@16onceuponatime 😅😅😅

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@BambixRussell Zak is a key decision maker—and he won last year
Toto is a key decision maker and he won this year

Whoever that is for Ferrari, should be trackside as well

Only a hypothesis, of course :)

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@GiovanniCi48815 Sorry—tried to save space 😅

Year over year = YoY

Typically, if you tether performance responsibilities to board members that ultimately aren’t satisfied, then you can remove them.

My suggestion is to tether trackside performance—since that doesn’t seem to be the case

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@sharl_leclerc16 😅

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@lh44views 😅

[CODEF(x) @code____Fx]

@HLSIII Who would you say, is the key decision maker for Ferrari trackside operations? Whoever that person is—bring them trackside