What if users could approve a subscription without giving a dApp unlimited wallet access?
ERC-7715 enables granular permissions for subscriptions, recurring payments, and automated actions.
Watch @codingwithmanny break it down ๐
https://t.co/5PmvSQ3VVI
Introducing Screendrop - a screenshot tool for everyone
Opensource
Host your own cloud with R2 + a tiny little hono worker
Native
Screenshot capture and editor
Video recorder, editor and compressor
This is one of the best apps I've built.
1/ Berachain's Proof of Liquidity is evolving.
As crypto adapts to fit a more mature crowd of asset allocators, the Beras are making some changes.
Here's everything you need to know about the new PoL ๐งต
BrownFi V3
โโโโโโโโโโ 90% Complete ๐
In traditional market making, bid-ask spread is the top 1 tool to protect LPs against informed traders (or adverse selection). But in most AMMs, Spread = zero, where Bid and ask collapse to the same point on the bonding curve. LPs are fully exposed.
BrownFi V3 changes this.
We built a dynamic spread system that responds to real market signals:
- Oracle price discrepancy
- Volume imbalance (VPIN)
- Markout & external price events
๐ก When market is stagnant (low volatility, balanced flow):
- VPIN is low โ flow is mostly uninformed
- Narrow the spread
- Maximize trade volume โ LPs earn more fee.
๐ด When market crashes (strong sell pressure):
- ๐ Widen Bid side โ Bid moves further down
- Limit LP losses from one-sided selling pressure of base token.
- ๐ Narrow Ask side โ attract buyers to get base token out, rebalance pool faster.
๐ข When market is in a momentum run (FOMO / one-sided buying pressure):
- Pool drains of base token as buyers pile in
- ๐ Widen Ask side โ make buying base more expensive
- Slow down informed/momentum buyers extracting value
- ๐ Narrow Bid side โ incentivize sellers to bring base back
- Pool rebalances before LPs take asymmetric inventory loss
With this design, each market regime can get a tailored response, not a one-size-fits-all fee hike like other AMMs. And this dynamic spread system can serve as a real market making desk in Defi.
wow, i want to re-iterate here, the @wasabi_protocol exploit isn't really a story about a stolen key. It's a story about what happens when one EOA controls a batch of upgradeable vaults with no multisig, no timelock, and no DAO governance as @evilcos and @zachxbt both pointed out within an hour of the drain (it should have never happen)
The mechanics: deployer EOA grants ADMIN_ROLE to an attacker contract โ UUPS upgrade replaces the perp vaults & LongPool with malicious logic โ strategyDeposit() called on 7 vaults โ drain(). 3 minutes, $5M+ across Ethereum, Base, Berachain & Blast. Largest single hit: 840.9 WETH (~$1.9M) from wWETH.
Wasabi has acknowledged the issue and asked users not to interact with contracts. @blockaid_ flagged that all Wasabi/Spicy LP-share tokens minted by these vaults should be treated as compromised the underlying assets are gone.
If you have funds anywhere in the protocol: withdraw and revoke approvals via @RoscoKalis's @RevokeCash. Big shoutout to him, the tool everyone reaches for on days like this.
34th major incident this month. April 2026: 30+ exploits, ~$630M drained. The recurring pattern keeps writing itself: privileged EOAs over upgradeable contracts, no governance friction, one phished signature away from zero.