Before claude I was oblivious to what an "eyebrow" was in terms of design. Now, not only do I know what it is but I despise it with every fiber of my being.
Is there a name for this phenomenon?
amen
I don't have time to go read every eth magicians thread, and there are so many proposed eips that aren't worth weighing in on because until it's actually revised and closer to a final form and inclusion it doesn't impact me and isn't worth debating
we don't want to debate eips on forums, we want core devs to be cognizant of how app devs use the chain and improve without breaking things
Never ever break an existing contract is not workable. It would mean you cannot change the gas schedule.
You also cannot deprecate signature schemes which we will most likely bave to do in the future.
Instead, we should be clear what kinds of contracts will not break. If you rely on gas schedule or state commitment, for example, you can't expect your contract to work forever and it needs to be upgradable or its users need to be aware that they have to exit under some circumstances.
"Make sure your contracts still work after the upgrade"
and if they don't? is the protocol going to give me a way to alter their bytecode to make sure they continue working?
absolutely batshit crazy work by core devs
PSA: Please verify that your contracts are still working after Glamsterdam! We created a repository with Invariants that will be broken after the fork, so you can verify for yourself.
https://t.co/jjgWau9hfl
can someone give me the tl;dr on why everyone hates protonmail all of a sudden
seems like I've seen a ton of negative sentiment all of a sudden out of nowhere