No, you don't get it.
He does not have $1 trillion sitting in cash, it is 99% stock in his companies.
To make that wealth liquid would mean selling all that stock which would swiftly destroy *both* the companies (Tesla, SpaceX, others) and the wealth. If he sold it all, he'd end up with maybe $100b max, several hundred thousand people would be out of work, the companies ruined and many of their suppliers also ruined.
Okay, but now Elon has $100b in cash, and can "solve the world's problems".
$100b divided by the world's 8 billion people is $12
If you were in charge, several of the most innovative industrial companies in the world would be destroyed, hundreds of thousands out of work, and space would again close to human civilization for another generation.
But everyone on earth could have one nice meal and you could revel in your altruism.
Scariest video I've watched this week
America's next generation actively booing the most transformative technology our species has ever seen
In China grandmas line up to get OpenClaw installed
In America, supposedly our most educated people BOO even the mention of AI
The west simply does not stand a chance if this continues
We have a massive AI marketing problem in this country and nobody is doing anything to fix it
Tomorrow Meta will announce 8,000 layoffs. They will blame it completely on AI
They won't blame it on their irresponsible hiring in 2021 or extended elevated rates or horrible market conditions or bad inflation
No, in order to not tank their stock, they'll blame it on AI
College students will read that and learn to HATE the technology
They'll protest outside datacenters holding ridiculous signs that say "SAVE OUR WATER NO MORE DATACENTERS"
Politicians will see this and run on blocking data centers just to get a few votes
All of it will be a cycle that leads to America losing to China
This should be a warning sign to all frontier labs and CEOs: messaging matters. And if your messaging doesn't change the West is cooked
New all-time record convert baptisms in 2025, an increase of 24.9% from last year.
2025: 385,490 (+24.9%)
2024: 308,682 (+22.6%)
2023: 251,763 (+18.7%)
2022: 212,172 (+26.1%)
2021: 168,283 (+33.7%)
2020: 125,930
Previous all-time record: 330,877 (1990) — broken by 54,613
Researchers broadly agree: higher income, higher IQ, and more education all predict lower fertility in women.
One exception: Latter-day Saints.
Among them, the relationship inverts. The more educated, affluent, and intelligent the woman, the more children she tends to have.
Massive move from Claude
Claude can now control your entire computer. Just tested and it actually works really well. Definitely will use it regularly
Does this kill OpenClaw?
Well…no for many reasons.
It’s still in Anthropic’s closed garden. The future is open and model agnostic
For instance on my 2nd computer I have a local version of Qwen 3.5 running. It continuously scans specific websites for business opportunities (for free) 24/7/365
If I wanted to make changes to this automation, I would send a message to my OpenClaw on Telegram. It would then SSH into my DGX Spark, download a new local model if it needs to, load it into memory, then use it as a tool whenever it wants to do a scan. If it doesn’t know how to do any step here, it’ll create its own skill
This will never be possible with Claude. You simply will never be able to leverage other models when necessary that complete tasks the Claude line can’t do. (And obviously you’ll never be able to do anything locally)
Also for reasons I 100% understand, there are guardrails all over Claude that would make it difficult to complete most of those tasks (a lot of what I described introduces a ton of security risks)
Claude is still awesome though. Claude Code is still an amazing, if not the best way to write code. Adding these computer use tools into Claude Code makes it an even more compelling product
I’m a daily Claude Code user and think EVERYONE should be including it in their daily routine
But it’s simply not a general purpose, open, customizable, self improving agent
I would use Claude over OpenClaw if:
• You have no interest in tinkering with or customizing your AI agent
• Are paying for the $200 a month Max plan and have no interest in using other AI models
• If your entire workflow is at the computer (still find the remote/telegram Claude stuff unreliable at the moment)
But if you think this is a replacement for OpenClaw I think it proves you don’t even really know what OpenClaw is, let alone have ever used it
If I’m you I’m muting/blocking every engagement farmer who will quote the post below with “OPENCLAW IS DEAD” and then put some cringe reaction gif of John Hamm dancing or Ryan gosling slowly taking his sunglasses off since I guess those reaction videos are now an algo hack.
Sequoia (@sequoia) Partner @JulienBek tells us why the next $1Trillion company will be a software company masquerading as a services firm:
"Ultimately, if you look at the TAM today, for every dollar that you spend on software, $6 are spent on services".
"If you sell the tools, the models are getting better and better and so you're at risk... whereas, if you sell the services, you're actually delivering outcomes."
"Until now, we could really just go after the $1, but now with services first and human at the centre, we think you can capture the six".
The last month has arguably had more development in AI than the last 3 years combined.
Everyone's building AI companies now. Everyone's talking about the Saaspocalypse.
We can now see the pathway: the platforms that will win aren't the ones with the best AI — that's becoming a commodity.
The real game is moats. And there are only a handful left worth building on, in order of cost/complexity/barrier to entry that come to mind:
"The human premium" (relationships, skills training, etc)
Brand via a tight knit, loyal community
Deep workflow embedding (migration is too painful to justify leaving) - extra strength points if you control your data
Ruthless vertical specialization (zoning in on your hedgehog concept)
Proprietary data
Regulatory positioning (licenses and compliance that take years to earn)
Physical infrastructure (takes years + massive capital — even better when fused with software)
IMO you need at least 2-3 of these to build on like a fortress for even a chance to survive as a Saas over the next 3-5 years
Any I missed?
For the foreseeable future, everything about starting a startup, both good and bad, will be accentuated. It will be even harder to figure out what to do, but the founders who get it right will be able to create amazing things even faster than they could before.
I meet a lot of founders who are worried by the rapid rate of technological change. They shouldn't be. It may feel uncomfortable, but techno-turbulence is net good for startups. They're much more likely to adapt successfully to some big change than incumbents are.
I am so bullish on the real world.
Group events. Cookouts. Sports. Parties. Animals. Music festivals. Phoneless dinners. Co-living centers. Healing centers. Retreat centers. Beautiful views. Group adventures.
These things light me up. Tech, ai, and materialism continue to disguest me more every day.
The pendulum has swung too far. A small group of soulless nerds will continue to obsess over ai, automation, effiency, and the intellect. But those of us connected to our hearts and spirits are becoming disgusted by it. We want real, and we want human.
Expect a huge countersurge of irl businesses and events in the next few years.
I am a techno-optimist
The next few years will see a lot of people's jobs change
But I strongly believe the overall rising tide will lift all boats
It just requires an open mind to change
AI is amazing for small-TAM custom software.
Indeed, the smaller the market, the more amazing it is. Because small markets typically don’t support the costs of software development.