“Obsession” (2026), is an allegory for bad prompting and misaligned AI.
If Bear had phrased his One Wish Willow request with proper safety constraints (“while remaining herself, happy, and not a demonic entity”), the whole movie would’ve been a rom-com.
Who decides who's a criminal?
The answer will just roll back around to "the state" and we're back where we started. I agree we're in a temporary chill period and lucky that Tornado Cash is legal on a technicality. Call me crazy but it being legal or not shouldn't bear upon it's existence. Privacy tech should be maximally privacy-protecting. It has a purpose, it should fulfill that purpose. Because, like you say, Congress can just regulate it out of legality or into gimped infectiveness.
Phil Zimmerman said it best: "if privacy is outlawed only outlaws will have privacy." The American move is to chose outlawry over lack of privacy.
And the slavery stuff at the end is such a nonsequitur it's not worth responding to. Unless you want to do the work of actually explaining the relevance
@mert@bajpaiharsh244@JonWalch@Helius it would probably be fine as long as it's not run as a business, has no central points of failure, and ideally has undoxxed devs
Today, 1 in 2 Ethereum blocks will be protected.
With Phylax, apps can set circuit breakers that Titan Builder enforces at block construction, excluding transactions that violate app-defined rules before settlement.
It's a simple idea: hacks should not settle.
Blatantly centralized and stoppable privacy apps are welcomed at conferences, core devs cheer for the adoption of custodial stablecoins, and L2s remain stage 1 in the age of AI-assisted formal verification.
You are delusional if you think Ethereum has too many purity tests
@cptgrumpus@stonecoldpat0 poor literacy. I said "if that's what it takes". In reality, that's not what it takes.
but if it hypothetically were, then you should agree.
Okay great. Lets stop terrorists by discouraging friends and neighbors from
- holding funds on exchanges
- using scams like Axie Infinity
- using custodial “De”Fi like Drift
and not by building and evangelizing censorship layers, which play directly into the hands of enemies at home who can more directly hurt you
@hanni_abu Don’t use anything that would leak enough data about you for a censorship layer to screen.
Find a way to onramp directly to a shielded pool, or get paid directly in a shielded pool for your work.
@cptgrumpus@stonecoldpat0 it is none of our jobs to placate the misplaced hysteria about foreign cybercrime when we have enemies of free speech at home.