@JamesSurowiecki China will be leading the way in research. American farmers will have to beg for new seeds and guess what, the Chinese will make them overpay and only deliver a suboptimal variant, and the best for themselves, and eventually flood the market with their own cheap and good beans.
@WUTangKids Love how the bootstrap MAGATs say that people in difficult circumstances "made bad life choices and ate too many avocado toasts", when they blow $1700 to watch a retarded orange clown begin his destruction of America🤣
@ChrisCostCFA @mcuban Tariff is literally lose-lose. China lose by selling less, Americans lose by paying more. Who loses more depends on who relies more on trade, i.e. China’s reliance on digitally printed USD vs. American’s need for real manufactured goods.
@notcapnamerica Is this supposed to be negative? I mean a lot of these staff will go on to help govern the most powerful country of humanity so maybe, just maybe it’s entirely reasonable to expect them to be best of the best?
Day36: A tragic end for Lisa Sowards, 56, from Hickory, NC. She, her mother and daughter contracted COVID-19. Lisa didn't make it. Was posting anti-vax garbage as she lay dying of COVID. @joerogan#480daysoffacepalm
https://t.co/nfHfJrNEwa
Day32:Kevin McKenzie, 33, once an avid anti-vaxxer from Senoia, GA, died from COVID-19, pleading in his final days for others to get vaccinated. His story is a heart-wrenching reminder to heed science over misinformation. @joerogan#480daysoffacepalm
https://t.co/HaGVvpXL9X
Day29:Despite witnessing her brother's close call with COVID, Georgette Colson (57) remained anti-vax. She succumbed to the virus on her birthday. #480daysoffacepalm@RobertKennedyJr
https://t.co/ZNVcPX7R03
You can't live debate crazy, they will always win.
Live debate is just performance art. Somebody will make some new claim nobody has heard of before, and it'll be impossible to refute without having the time to go research what they just said. "Samuelsson's study from late 2021 proves you wrong". What study? I dunno, I just made it up.
The only rational debate is via the written word. One side writes something, somebody else rebuts point by point, and so on. But for the most part, podcasts are for people who can't (or don't) read, so it's not going to happen for that audience.
RFK and Rogan start with rejecting science, so there's really no way their points can be rebutted. If you only speak Japanese, you can't talk to somebody who only speaks French. This is especially a problem when the audience doesn't understand the basics of science, who'll believe that science is what RFK and Rogan claim it is.
No, no, I don't mean you should believe scientists or a consensus (they've proven untrustworthy). I mean the science itself.
In the end, the winner of the live debate isn't the one who is best at facts, but the one most willing to misrepresent facts. And that's RFK and Rogan. They will win any live debate.
Serious debate is written, live debates is for fools (Rogan's audience).
A federal jury has convicted West Virginia police officer, Billy Griffith, for possession of over 3,000 images & videos of child sexual abuse materials.