Greg Scott

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

@UniqueFlakey @GoodTroubleShow @JasonColavito @AeroTech_Space @MiddleOfMayhem @flarkey @SusanGerbic I just don't see what you're basing these assertions on. This is uncharted territory, my friend. It's not clear at all to me that there wouldn't be reasons to bury this forever from the American people. It gets pretty dark the more you read about it.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

So you just don't understand how classification levels, security clearances, and NDAs work in DoD? I do, and I can help.

You can't just publicly divulge whatever you think American citizens need to know, because you will end up, for the rest of your life, either in prison, or alone in a Moscow flat. He submitted first hand evidence that is not public through the proper channels via the Inspector General, which is ultimately why senior members of the Senate like Chuck Schumer are not letting this go, and will keep pushing the UAPDA.

They have to work through a legislative process to make this happen, otherwise they will just be silenced immediately and nothing will change.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

@UniqueFlakey @GoodTroubleShow @JasonColavito @AeroTech_Space @MiddleOfMayhem @flarkey @SusanGerbic Why do your first few posts about UFOs seems supportive of David Grusch, and now you are trolling me with leprechaun jokes. It’s quite a 180 in a very short period, and I’m just curious as to the impetus for that.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

I noticed your effusive praise of Brian Dunning’s commentary on the UAP topic. Did you know that he went to prison for wire fraud? Or that Greenstreet was once employed as a State Department contractor, a role in which he produced content he admitted was indistinguishable from “propaganda”? Just wondering if this, in any way, diminishes the high regard in which you hold these gentlemen.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

@LuAngeles Enjoy your last few tweets bruh

Going to age POORLY

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

“Overwhelming probability” that all of these people are lying based on your pure conjecture.

Next sentence: probably because that document I haven’t read is full of pork barreling (spoiler: it’s not).

Final sentence: I actually don’t know anything about this because I don’t follow it.

You are a gentleman and a scholar, sir.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

You are quite confused. Let me help you.

No, I would not look into your leprechaun claim, because you are one person on the internet whom I don’t know, with bastardized Orwell quote in your bio, whose twitter posts consist nearly 100% of sardonic taunts that receive zero engagement, leveled at those you deem intellectually inferior. These are not the signs of a well-adjusted and thoughtful observer.

The US government’s UAP policy, on the other hand, has been receiving damning criticism from top government officials with access to the most classified material imaginable, whose careers placed them at the center of UAP-related investigations that have been conducted by DoD and across the interagency for many decades. Several have testified under oath before Congress under penalty of perjury, and if they are lying, it is not at all clear what would incentivize them to do so.

After each hearing, the interest among legislators continues to grow, and the lawmakers who are most concerned about this are the most powerful ones, whose committee assignments landed them in classified UAP hearings, the substance of which is completely unknown to the public. Chuck Schumer and Marco Rubio are examples of this.

Speaking of Schumer, whatever your politics, he is regarded as one of the most shrewd, pragmatic and calculating Senators of perhaps the past century. He sponsored legislation in 2023 and 2024 that uses the phrase “non-human intelligence” 22 times, along with “controlled disclosure campaign” and “legacy programs”. It’s so obvious where this is going, it’s almost funny to see the sanctimony of people like you lecture me about evidentiary requirements for belief.

If you’re still confused - you are 100% right that any claim of this nature must be backed with unambiguous proof of the existence of a non-human presence. But you don’t get to decide whether that evidence exists within our government until Mike Turner, Mike Rogers, and Mitch McConnell stop blocking the UAP Disclosure Act from becoming law. And on that topic, why would they be so concerned about declassifying decades old UAP documents?

I know you’re really smart, so I’m sure you already know what a “Bayesian inference” refers to in science. That would be something for you to consider, along with learning some humility.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but are you actually a bot? In these posts, you should consider anchoring your statements to an external source of some kind that corroborates what you’re saying. You are coming across as completely insane, and this is coming from someone who has probably watched 25 UFO documentaries and read as many books about it. I mean this as nothing more than helpful feedback.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

@AYates80267549 @ShawnRyan762 @GenFlynn I suppose he also lobbied on behalf of foreign governments and then lied about it to the FBI and Vice President. Before making a public oath of allegiance to Q’anon. Which, I have to say, was also strange.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

These self-congratulatory videos all over social media of people going about their daily routine ensconced in silk are designed to casually provoke envy, but are obviously performative. They betray the insecurity of someone who is not at peace with herself, so she must seek validation in the form of a steady dopamine drip from twitter likes. I would say your aversion to this speaks to your character.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

@ShawnRyan762 @GenFlynn Such a strange comment from Flynn. She launched an independent fact-finding mission out of exasperation over our government’s inaction. She did not purport to be an “oracle” and I’m not sure why he’d invoke such a term.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

That’s not all you’re pointing out; you’re attempting to distract from the central issue of drone sightings over sensitive military facilities with meaningless, pedantic blathering. The problem is not anyone’s “reading comprehension”, but pretentious dilettantes on the internet like you and Mick West who are making light of a serious issue, about which DoD and the media is being untruthful. Grow up.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

You were making light of it by suggesting it was mass hysteria, and that the issue at hand is my reading comprehension but the reality is that it’s very serious. Whether nor not all of the bases were shut down is childish hair-splitting. WTF are the objects, and who is controlling them? It’s ok, one day you and Mick West will have the opportunity to delete your X accounts, which evidence some of the silliest commentary in the history of human civilization.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

@QIs4Quantum To summarize, you have no ability to assess the implications of brazen incursions over US airspace, nor can you interpret public commentary from defense officials or understand subtext. Good thing you are just a d*pshit on the internet.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

@P_Dubbin @QIs4Quantum @MickWest It’s literally factual information with no interpretive overlay. Get a grip.

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

@P_Dubbin @RJDittmer @astroplainblain @MickWest Ironic, because all of the whistleblowers so far have been combat veterans. Do you move your lips when you read?

[Greg Scott @copernican451]

@Angryscotsman74 @GoodTroubleShow @NASA You bet yer boots he is