Charlie Pappis

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@AlexBerenson The media cannot stop the drama; creating false anxiety is their business model!

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@BasedMikeLee 💯

[Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 @pmarca]

Climate alarmist politicians buying oceanfront homes, etc. Many such cases.

[Ron DeSantis @RonDeSantis]

It’s inconceivable that two future Hall of Famers would be combat vets in today’s day and age.

Great ballplayers and great Americans!

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@charliebilello @PeterSchiff Now show transistors

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@LindyTasteful Anything for attention!

[Mike Netter @nettermike]

Black pilot, West Point graduate, and combat veteran Wesley Hunt delivered a masterclass response:

“Hey Jasmine… Black pilot here.

I graduated from West Point. I went through Army flight school. I learned to fly the AH-64 Apache. I deployed to combat and flew 55 combat missions over Baghdad.

Nobody handed me a cockpit because of my skin color. Nobody lowered the standards for me.

Suggesting that Black pilots, engineers, doctors, or leaders need special preferences to succeed is not empowering, it’s insulting.

I didn’t want a different standard. I wanted the same standard.”

He ended with a powerful line:

“Merit isn’t racist. Excellence isn’t discriminatory. And reducing every achievement to skin color says far more about your worldview than it does about mine.”

This is the kind of clarity and backbone America needs right now.

[Handre @Handre]

While six million Ukrainians starved to death in 1932-33, Stalin employed a personal chef who prepared elaborate Georgian feasts in his private dining rooms. You need to understand what this tells you about the fundamental nature of state power and economic calculation.

Stalin maintained twenty dachas across the Soviet Union, each staffed with servants, stocked with rare wines, and equipped with private cinemas for his entertainment (this makes for a very interesting Google search). His security detail numbered in the thousands. His personal train car featured bulletproof glass and mahogany paneling. Meanwhile, peasants in Ukraine ate grass, bark, and leather belts before dying in the streets. Bureaucratic incompetence did not cause this. The iron logic of socialism produced it.

Central planners face no market prices to guide resource allocation. Without profit and loss signals, they cannot know what people actually need or value. So resources flow to political priorities instead of economic ones. Stalin's comfort took precedence over Ukrainian lives because political power, not consumer demand, determined production and distribution. The state controlled all grain, all transportation, all information. When you eliminate private property and market exchange, you eliminate the only mechanism that coordinates production with human needs.

Free market economists predicted this outcome decades before the Holodomor. Ludwig von Mises explained in 1920 that socialist economies cannot rationally allocate resources because they lack price signals from voluntary exchange. Without market prices, central planners operate blindly. They literally cannot know what to produce, how much to produce, or where to send it.

Every socialist experiment repeats this pattern: the political elite live in luxury while ordinary people suffer shortages, famines, and death. This outcome was inevitable the moment private property was abolished.

[Handre @Handre]

The most spectacular economic miracle of the last 500 years occurred as food consumption dropped from 80% of income to 3%. Your ancestors spent virtually every waking hour and every earned dollar feeding their families. Today you casually toss organic blueberries into your cart without checking the price.

This transformation didn't happen because governments subsidized agriculture or bureaucrats planned better crop rotations. It happened because private property rights allowed farmers to capture the full value of their innovations, spurring relentless productivity gains.

Consider what free markets accomplished: wheat yields per acre increased 10-fold since 1800. Corn production exploded 6-fold per acre since 1930. The price of basic foodstuffs, adjusted for wages, fell by 90% over two centuries. Each breakthrough, from the steel plow to hybrid seeds to GPS-guided tractors, emerged from entrepreneurs risking their own capital to solve real problems.

The profit motive drove farmers to maximize output while minimizing inputs. No central planner could coordinate the millions of decisions required: which seeds to plant, when to harvest, how to transport goods, where to build storage facilities. Market prices transmitted this information instantly across the globe, connecting Iowa corn farmers to Tokyo consumers without a single bureaucrat involved.

Politicians love claiming credit for "feeding America" through agricultural subsidies and price supports. Yet these interventions consistently reward inefficiency and punish innovation. The real heroes remain the anonymous farmers and inventors who transformed scarcity into abundance by following price signals rather than political directives.

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@adamcarolla Spot on

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@luisbaram A bit full of himself!

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@miles_commodore D

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@ClayTravis Progress for sure, but still unacceptably high.

[Jonathan Cohler @cohler]

The vast majority of what you think you know about climate science is not only false, most of it doesn’t even exist!

You have been betrayed by ALL the modern institutions of climate science:

IPCC, NASA, NOAA, WMO, …

They have ALL been lying TO YOU for 40 years now.

If you are under 50, you have been misled for your entire education.

Sorry to upset your post-truth delusion. It’s time to return now to TRUTH and REALITY.

1. CO2 is good not bad. It is the gas of life itself.
2. CO2 rise in the atmosphere is NOT caused by fossil fuel burning.
3. Humans are not driving any climate change.
4. There is no global temperature. And since it DOESNT EXIST, it’s also NOT RISING.
5. “Global warming” as defined by climate science—a rise in global temperature—DOESNT EXIST.
6. There is no such thing as global ocean pH and the ocean is NOT “acidifying”.
7. Sea-level rise rate is unchanged for 200 years or more. There is no acceleration. Satellites cannot measure the fictitious Global mean sea level.
8. Argo-based “ocean heat content” is a fraud and cannot be measured the way they claim to do.
9. Earth’s Energy Imbalance as promulgated by NASA is a fraud.
10. And the list goes on and on…
11. The Earth has NOT “warmed” by 1.1 °C
12. There is no such thing as equilibrium climate sensitivity. It does not exist.
…
…

It has ALL been LIES for decades now. Straight from the institutions and scientists you trusted.

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@alx Suicidal empathy

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@luisbaram Suicidal empathy

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@RepLisaMcClain @MayraFlores4TX Im shocked 26% agree. I would’ve guessed 5% or less

[Steve Milloy @JunkScience]

We have sent this letter to President Trump urging him to finalize the termination of greenhouse gas regulation for power plants.

The urgent need for this action is underscored by the apparent effort within the Department of Justice to sabotage the Trump energy agenda, which I exposed over the weekend. https://t.co/ew3Syv78Wz

https://t.co/IppwF3jxY1

[Charlie Pappis @cpappis]

@CO2Coalition 100%!

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Marc Andreessen just explained how the United States assassinated its own future.

In the 1970s, the Nixon administration launched something called Project Independence.

The mandate was absolute.

Andreessen: “Build a thousand new civilian nuclear power plants in the US by the year 2000.”

One thousand reactors. Unlimited, carbon-free baseload power. Enough electricity to move the entire country to electric vehicles four decades ahead of everyone else.

But it went further than energy.

Andreessen: “It’s called Project Independence because it means the US won’t have to be involved in the Middle East anymore, because we won’t need the oil.”

No oil dependence. No Gulf Wars. No generations of soldiers stationed in deserts protecting supply chains that never needed to exist.

A complete strategic withdrawal from the Middle East. Permanent.

And none of this was hypothetical.

Andreessen: “France ran for a long time almost entirely on nuclear power. Japan ran for a long time almost entirely on nuclear power.”

Other nations proved it worked at scale. America had more capital, more engineers, and more ambition than all of them.

Andreessen: “How many nuclear power plants were built out of the thousand? Rounds to zero.”

Zero.

Not because the physics failed. Not because something superior replaced it.

Because the same administration that drafted the blueprint for unlimited energy also created the institution that killed it.

Andreessen: “They never got built because the Nixon administration also created the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which made it its purpose in life is to stop nuclear power plants from getting built.”

Same government. Same decade. Same pen.

One directive launching the most ambitious energy program in American history.

Another creating the bureaucracy that would quietly dismantle it from the inside.

Andreessen: “The Nuclear Regulatory Commission did not approve a new nuclear plant design for 40 years.”

Forty years of zero approved designs. Not because no one submitted them. Because the institution built to regulate nuclear energy became the institution built to prevent it.

That’s not oversight.

That’s abolition dressed as due diligence.

We spent the next fifty years fighting wars in the desert for a resource we never needed.

Choked the atmosphere with carbon we didn’t have to burn.

Terrified an entire generation with the illusion of scarcity.

And the entire time, the physics already worked.

The government didn’t fail to navigate the energy crisis.

They took the densest source of energy in the universe and drowned it in paperwork.

Every war fought for oil. Every carbon debate. Every geopolitical crisis of the last half century.

All of it was a policy choice.

We didn’t lack the technology to power the future.

We let a committee outlaw the math.