forrestt gump

unfiltered thoughts, social patterns, observations, politics, Medicine #Canada #India #USA.

[manoj @manojpiece]

Indian leftists after hearing the identity of the hero who saved passengers from a plane hijacking:

[Aravind @aravind]

Till now we do not know the name and identity of the terrorist co-pilot.

Crash the plane. Kill Israelis. Blame it on the Indian pilot without evidence. This was the plan, l think.

We could feel the entire GLISCO infiltrated media and anti-India social media ecosystem was prepped and ready.

Once the plane was saved, sadly for these cowards, the way they covered the news hiding the name of the attacker and the nationality of the savior gives it away.

The most important and bravest thing Captain Smit did was open the cockpit door. Or else, we know what would have been the propaganda if something terrible had happened with the door closed.

The crash would have been in some non-Israeli territory, and even the blackbox would have been tampered with or sent to some Pak run UK/US lab to make it into "the Indian captain's actions are questionable" to build anti-India propaganda over it.

The attacks on Indian pilots, doctors, sailors, engineers etc have been relentless in the last few years. This is in addition to anti-Indian racism selectively being fanned in countries with Indian diaspora to kick them out.

So some others, whose home country is stagnating economically, can get those opportunities while India's NRI based economy is hit. This is the plan going on world over if you notice the pattern carefully.

Let's wait for this co-pilot's motives and links to be uncovered. It won't be surprising, to say the least, his room mate, neighbor, friend, influencer would be from terroristan.

[forrestt gump @crazyyWood]

@DavidMKeyes Only way to make sure it is #IndianRestaurent is either you know owner by name or they do not serve Beef!

[Anand Ranganathan @ARanganathan72]

Fact: An unbelievably brave and bloodied Indian pilot fights off repeated stabbings by his Islamist co-pilot in a plummeting plane and saves 180 innocent lives by preventing a 9/11 style terror attack.

BBC:

[Raja Muneeb @RajaMuneeb]

Two publications racing each other towards the bottom of the pit.

[forrestt gump @crazyyWood]

The @flydubai hijacking #terrorist incident ll undoubtedly reduce people opting to fly through or on #UAE or on any #islamistcountry airlines. One may carry hate but why this #JihadiAgenda to kill innocents, children. This reflects on their #Upbringing #Values #Culture

[Office Of Vijay Patel @VijayGajeraO]

So it was Indian pilot Smit Machchhar who saved the lives of 200-plus people on a Flydubai flight.

Reportedly, his Omani co-pilot stabbed him and tried to crash the flight, but Smit gained control and saved many lives.

[forrestt gump @crazyyWood]

@HuinGuillaume @McDonalds People are discovering Gujarati taste buds! IYkyk

[speaknsee @speaknsee]

This guy's speech is just plain 🤪weird,🤓 wrong, off, and sounds to me like he's "selling" and "defending" terrorism. Am I just trippin😵‍💫 or what?

Trump? Bro! did you hear this guy? We 🇺🇸 can't be associated with these 🤡

@realDonaldTrump @narendramodi @SecRubio @DrSJaishankar

[MajorSammerToor @MajorSammerToor]

Now that's called INTERNATIONAL BEIZZATTI!

[forrestt gump @crazyyWood]

@GippyGrewal is using public platform to shame employees who might be just doing their job to accommodate overbooked flight! Being public figure doesn't mean everyone ll treat u a king and U can humiliate someone! what about their safety from extremist elements? Shame on you.

[Gippy Grewal @GippyGrewal]

Really bad experience with @AirCanada on AC1504

I paid for business class and they put me in economy. When I asked what happened, the answer was basically “it happened, we can’t do anything. You can take the flight or leave it.”

Not even a simple apology.

When I kept asking why, instead of trying to help, I was told I could be taken off the plane.

I wasn’t asking for anything extra. I was only asking for the business class seat I paid for and an explanation.

@AirCanada

[Anand Ranganathan @ARanganathan72]

Dear @Javedakhtarjadu. I'm afraid your response is as boring and overloaded as your similes and metaphors. When countered with facts, you shift the goalpost, bring in the RSS, berate the right wing, take refuge in context, cushion the bigotry, and claim Kafirs were Colonialists not Hindus.

I know countering you again is like watering a cactus and praying for leechis, but in the hope that all that knee massaging with Doctor Ortho would have sprouted some neurons, here goes:

You asked for a source because you said the quote was “quite unlike” Azad’s “lifelong sociopolitical stances.” I gave you the source: Calcutta, 27 October 1914, published in Khutbat-e-Azad. The words are his. That should have ended the enquiry. It did not. So let us walk through your new script, line by line.

1. “The khutbats were about Khilafat and British colonialism.”

Yes. That is what I wrote. Maulana Azad was telling Indian Muslims that a Turk’s battlefield thorn must be felt in a Hindustani Muslim’s heart; that Millat-e-Islam is one body; that friendship and enmity are for the religion of Allah. Then he quoted Quran 48:29 and added his own gloss: be extremely hard against disbelievers, extremely kind among yourselves, and do not pass over this as if you had not heard it. You asked for the when and where. You received both. “It was about Khilafat” is not a rebuttal. It is the context in which he said it.

2. “To claim he was quoting this about the Hindus of India will not be true. The Kafir here was the colonialist.”

I did not say the 1914 speech was a municipal circular against the Hindus of Howrah. I quoted what Azad quoted: a Quranic verse about kuffar, and his commentary on unbelief, Tawhid, and hardness toward disbelievers. If Azad had meant “kafir = only the British officer,” he knew Urdu enough to say Angrez. He did not. He used the Book’s word, then told his flock not to skip it.

And if “kafir” in Azad’s mouth was a temporary colonial nickname, kindly explain the 1920 Hijrat fatwa, published in Ahl-e-Hadith of Amritsar, in which he said Indian Muslims had no choice but to migrate, and that those who stayed and kept connection with “the enemy of Islam” would themselves be counted as the enemy of Islam. That is not a lecture on income-tax collectors. That is a theology of the land.

3. “When Ataturk took over, Azad called it a closed chapter and condoned the secular government.”

Men change. Texts do not. If later Azad made peace with the death of the Caliphate, good for the later Azad. It does not unsay 1914, nor the Khilafat years, nor Masala-e-Khilafat, nor the call that any government hostile to Turkey was hostile to Islam, not the belief in the Quranic verse damning the Kafirs. You began by saying the paragraph was unlike his lifelong stances. Lifelong includes the years he spent as a pan-Islamist firebrand. Evolution is not an eraser. It is a timeline.

4. “Read his Calcutta High Court statement. An honour no member of the Mahasabha or RSS was ever given.”

Sedition charges from the Raj are not a unique family heirloom. Tilak got them. Aurobindo got them. Savarkar was given two life terms and sent to Cellular Jail, where the honour included the oil mill, the lash, and years in a cell the size of a cupboard.

And of course, knowing your pitiful knowledge of Indian History, I guess you would not know legendary RSS names like Devipad Chaudhary, Jagatpati Kumar, Anna Saheb Deshpande, Ramakant Keshav, Vasantrao Oak, Narayan Singh, Chandrakant Bhardwaj, Dada Naik Chimur, Baburao Begade, Lala Hansraj, Balaji Raipurkar who participated in our freedom struggle and were jailed or shot.

5. “Azad was in British jails for nine years. Name one from your right wing who can match that.”

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar: roughly a decade in Kala Pani, further years in mainland jails, then thirteen years of internment in Ratnagiri. Sentence on paper: fifty years. Conditions: not Ahmednagar Fort with time to write Ghubar-e-Khatir.

By the way, you might know that your great-great-grandfather Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi was also incarcerated at Kala Pani. What you might not know, or would want to hide, is that he wrote a grovelling mercy petition to the British, pleading to be released.

6. “In 1946 Jinnah refused to shake Azad’s hand. He hated Azad for his patriotism.”

How does this turn “be severe against the kafirs, merciful among themselves” into a sonnet about communal harmony? A man can spend 1946 refusing Partition and still have spent 1914 telling Indian Muslims that their first body is the ummah. Fairness is holding both pages open. What you are doing is hiding the 1914 page and waving the 1946 one like a flag.

7. “Your reference to Rahul Gandhi was unnecessary, I expect decency and class.”

And I expected you to have some sense of humour. The PS was a reminder that this is the second time I have had to fetch your hero’s paperwork. Last time it was Nehru’s India: books banned, editors sacked, films blocked, Majrooh jailed for a couplet.

You lecture me on class after moving from “this cannot be Azad” to “it is Azad but you must read kafir as colonialist” to “anyway he went to jail” to “Jinnah was rude to him” to “please don’t mention Rahul.” That is not class. That is a guided tour of every exit except the text.

Look, Javed sahab, let us end this here. I like you. Doubtless a lot of your work is incredible, truly it is. So in that spirit, permit me to pen an ode to you:

Javed Akhtar ko dekha toh aisa laga, jaise chhal ka nawab, jaise jhoot ki kitaab, jaise dhong ki kiran, jaise adambar ka van, jaise kapton ki baat, jaise pakhand ki raat, jaise janpath mein ho ek jalta diya.

Alvida, Shabba khair. WDTP

[Hims 🪷 🚴 🌱 🧘 @maveinlux]

Bollywood isn’t just entertainment anymore. It’s a cultural toxin, and one of the biggest reasons we now see an uncouth, classless, unemployable Gen Z on the streets: crude, abusive, spreading filth, lies, and hate as if that’s personality.

Someone in India insisted I watch Dhamaal 4. I started it reluctantly, skipped most of it, and still saw enough. It was a reminder of how low Bollywood has sunk.

The film fat-shames women and children throughout. It cheapens Hindu gods by showing them as transactional, responding to whoever offers more money. It puts two young children on screen speaking crassly, acting cunning and arrogant, constantly stuffing junk food. Then it sells all of this as comedy.

It doesn’t stop there. Unhealthy snacks are packaged as child-friendly fun. Actors like @ajaydevgn and @Riteishd, willingly participate in this.

Ask them the obvious questions. Does Ajay Devgn talk this way to Kajol? Do his children speak to him like that? Does Riteish Deshmukh speak this way to Genelia? If they would never tolerate this language and behaviour in their own homes, why do they sell it to the public, knowing these films play with almost no age restriction across India?

And to those two child actors: do you understand how you were used? Is that the version of yourselves you want to grow into?

Cinema shapes behaviour. It is one of the most powerful influencers in the country. The shame is that @CBFC_Bharat keep letting this kind of filth pass as family entertainment.
@shashidigital

[Sandeep Parswanath @sarpame]

Jainism is the oldest religion in the world, even older than Hinduism.
--Osho

[Indian Tintin @IndianTintin_]

'Satanic Verses' was banned under Congress.
It was finally unbanned and went on sale late 2024 under the BJP.
Salman Rushdie lost an eye due to Shia Islamists.
Who is he worried about?
"Hindutva".
Chagnonpill.

[William Seaborn @will_seaborn]

I respect his honesty.

But the reason why the Hindu community and Islamic community are so different in Western countries is because Hinduism and Islam are very different religions.

Hinduism teaches to respect your karmabhoomi. Islam has no such concept. Islamists can never be loyal to a non-Muslim country.

[Bharat Vivek @Bolrebol]

@HomerPavlos It happens across the globe, and you see that only one thing is common—

[Aravind @aravind]

Raghu raja and his party's praja waiting for the Indian economy to crash since 2015. I suggest they pray to China for help. Anyway same sanghatan.

[Mor Edge Insight @MorEdge_Insight]

This was, and remains, one of the most phenomenal and sensationally brilliant animated videos ever produced to highlight the abuse and cruelty towards women in Sharia law.

Whoever has not yet watched it, I absolutely recommend you do.

Massive praise and credit to @ThePosieParker who created it and shared this incredible video with the world

[Interesting things @awkwardgoogle]

"They're having problems with their economy again" 1975 cartoon by American artist Ron Cobb.

[Gabbar @GabbbarSingh]

This is unique to Hinduism.

Hinduism is rich in festivals that ritualise individual family relationship, not merely “family” generally, but husband–wife, brother–sister, and other specific bonds.

You have Karwa Chauth, Teej for Husband-wife, Raksha Bandhan for Brother & sister. Western morality which dictates much of Indian elite education, can’t seem to fathom such festivals, as it’s absent in Judeo-Christian religious traditions. So a happy consensual festival gets beaten by the baton of patriarchy. Brown sepoys actively take part.