🚨 100 LBS OF COPPER GIVEAWAY 🚨
We’re giving away 100 lbs of copper. 🏆
10 bars. 10 winners.
Copper is up 40%+ in the last year and it’s not slowing down. It powers EVs, AI data centers, solar, and the entire grid. Demand is rising. Supply is tight.
Most people still aren’t paying attention.
HOW TO ENTER:
✅ Follow @sdbullion
✅ Like this post
🔁 Repost + tag a friend (bonus entry)
🇺🇸 10 lb solid copper bars made in the USA.
⏳ Ends May 30.
🏁 Winners announced June 2.
to celebrate our new cross-chain crypto deposits launch with Moonshot, we're giving one follower $1,000 in Solana
for your chance to win:
💜 like + repost this
✅ follow @moonshot + @moonpay
one winner will be randomly selected on April 22!
Who wants to scratch for FREE to win the 120,000,000 $CSC JACKPOT?? 🤑
Win it and you're a MILLIONAIRE when $CSC is trading at ATH again 😲
REPOST TO MAKE A CHANCE!
🕐 Winner in 48 HRS
https://t.co/qcOvEVP9d9
$CSC $LHT $XRP #XRPL#XRPArmy#XRP#Web3Gaming $SOL #SolanaGems
This was not just slippage, and acting like the user simply accepted a bad trade is bullshit.
The order was already dead before execution. The signed minimum was 324.95 AAVE on a $50.4M swap. Fair value at the time was roughly 458,000 AAVE, not ~329. The actual fill was 327.24 AAVE, which means the execution landed basically right on top of the already-catastrophic quote. So stop hiding behind “1.21% slippage.” Slippage didn’t cause this. Your quote engine or routing logic did.
And the route itself is indefensible. Your stack pushed nearly 18,000 WETH through a Sushi pool that had about 331 AAVE and 17.6 WETH in reserves. That is a microscopic pool for a $50M swap. This wasn’t some last-second liquidity rug. The pool had been thin for days. Any system with even basic sanity checks should have rejected that route instantly.
The “0.7% surplus” argument is ridiculous. Surplus against a completely broken minimum means nothing. Beating a wrong floor by a couple AAVE is not proof the system worked. It’s proof the system faithfully executed a disaster it should never have allowed in the first place.
And “the price impact warning was displayed” is not a defense either. Neither is “the checkbox was checked.” If your interface can surface an absurd quote, apply smart slippage to that absurd quote, and then let a user route $50M into a pool with ~$70k of liquidity, that is a product failure.
“Permissionless DeFi” is also not some magic shield from responsibility. You can’t market a polished collateral-swap flow, algorithmically suggest slippage, abstract the complexity away from the user, and then when it blows up say well, they checked the box.
Responsibility here sits with the systems that generated the absurd quote, allowed the absurd minimum, and routed the order through an absurdly illiquid pool.
Every participant in this chain had exactly what they needed to stop it. Aave had the oracle price. CoW had its own quote. The solver had getReserves(). The minimum buy amount was sitting in the order, broadcasting the problem to anyone who looked. Not one layer acted on it
💰 $2,500 BITCOIN GIVEAWAY 💰
5 winners get $500 in Bitcoin each on March 31.
To enter:
1️⃣ Follow @moonpay
2️⃣ Like this post
3️⃣ RT to spread the love
p.s. if we hit 300K followers before March 31, we’ll add another $1,000.
Reply if you want to get MoonPaid 👇
As some of you may have noticed, the @XamanWallet + @FlareNetworks yield integration didn't work for the past few hours...
[mumbles something about popular demand and unforseen challenges no matter how much testing you do]
ℹ️ We worked hard and got it fixed. So let the demand continue. The users who deposited their initial < 1 XRP "Deposit request" who then didn't manage to continue will get a refund from us in the next 24h.
The vault is open again, the xApp is working again, may the Flare Smart Account Yield continue 🤗
‼️‼️It's been a while, but it's time to #Giveaway again!! 🎉
🔥🔥I'm giving away the most wanted @LuckyHashWin scratcher, The Royal Draw!!! 🤑🤑🤑
Scratch and WIN BIG for FREE!!
👉REPOST
👉FOLLOW
🕐WINNER ANNOUNCED IN 24 HRS
$XRP #XRPL#XRPCommunity $CSC @CasinoCoin
In November, I unexpectedly became enemy #1 of the XRP Army.
Through the resulting public learning process, I had a chance to meet many OG devs, core community members, memelords, and the team at Ripple itself, and I came to an understanding of the uniqueness of XRP as an asset, and its community.
It is with pleasure to announce that we are building a bridge to Solana with deep day 1 liquidity for XRP.
With XRP on Solana, holders and traders maintain access to the same underlying XRP as exists on the XRPL, but with an asset that can be used in any Solana DeFi:
- Earn yield by lending
- LP other tokens like SOL, stablecoins, or any one of the millions of Solana tokens with XRP in the liquidity pair
- Buy stocks, RWAs, yield-bearing tokens, prediction markets using XRP
- Explore the vast product ecosystem on Solana without routing through exchanges
And like any good bridge, your XRP on Solana is always redeemable 1:1 for XRP on the ledger itself. It is self-custodial from end to end.
Tomorrow @SolanaConf, I will join @luke_judges from Ripple to chat more about what this means and what the future has in store.